Tinnitus severity and dizziness: The role of psychological distress in a population-based study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-22 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104842
Hyunji Kim , Kyoungwoo Kim
{"title":"Tinnitus severity and dizziness: The role of psychological distress in a population-based study","authors":"Hyunji Kim ,&nbsp;Kyoungwoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the association between tinnitus severity and dizziness in a nationally representative sample of adults aged ≥40 years and to evaluate the contribution of psychological distress (anxiety and perceived stress).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 7634 participants in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2022−2023). Dizziness was defined as self-reported symptoms within the past 12 months. Tinnitus severity was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe compared with no tinnitus. Survey-weighted logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with sequential adjustment for sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, comorbidities, and psychological variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among adults aged 40 years and older, the weighted proportions of participants reporting dizziness and tinnitus symptoms were 33.7% and 10.2%, respectively. Tinnitus severity showed a graded association with dizziness (p for trend = 0.003 in Model 4). Compared with the no‑tinnitus group, moderate and severe tinnitus were associated with higher odds of dizziness after full adjustment (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.33–2.20; OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.75–3.39). Anxiety severity and perceived stress were independently associated with dizziness, and adjustment for these factors attenuated the tinnitus–dizziness association by approximately 9% and 19% for moderate and severe tinnitus.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tinnitus severity was independently associated with dizziness in a graded manner. Psychological distress was also associated with dizziness and partially attenuated this relationship, supporting a clinical approach that integrates auditory and psychological factors in the assessment of dizziness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 104842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070926000578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the association between tinnitus severity and dizziness in a nationally representative sample of adults aged ≥40 years and to evaluate the contribution of psychological distress (anxiety and perceived stress).

Methods

We analyzed data from 7634 participants in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2022−2023). Dizziness was defined as self-reported symptoms within the past 12 months. Tinnitus severity was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe compared with no tinnitus. Survey-weighted logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with sequential adjustment for sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, comorbidities, and psychological variables.

Results

Among adults aged 40 years and older, the weighted proportions of participants reporting dizziness and tinnitus symptoms were 33.7% and 10.2%, respectively. Tinnitus severity showed a graded association with dizziness (p for trend = 0.003 in Model 4). Compared with the no‑tinnitus group, moderate and severe tinnitus were associated with higher odds of dizziness after full adjustment (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.33–2.20; OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.75–3.39). Anxiety severity and perceived stress were independently associated with dizziness, and adjustment for these factors attenuated the tinnitus–dizziness association by approximately 9% and 19% for moderate and severe tinnitus.

Conclusions

Tinnitus severity was independently associated with dizziness in a graded manner. Psychological distress was also associated with dizziness and partially attenuated this relationship, supporting a clinical approach that integrates auditory and psychological factors in the assessment of dizziness.
耳鸣严重程度和头晕:心理困扰在人群基础研究中的作用。
目的:调查40岁以上成年人耳鸣严重程度与头晕之间的关系,并评估心理困扰(焦虑和感知压力)的影响。方法:我们分析了韩国国家健康与营养调查(2022-2023)的7634名参与者的数据。头晕被定义为过去12个月内自我报告的症状。与无耳鸣相比,耳鸣的严重程度分为轻度、中度或重度。调查加权逻辑回归模型估计了社会人口因素、健康行为、合并症和心理变量的顺序调整后的优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在40岁及以上的成年人中,报告头晕和耳鸣症状的加权比例分别为33.7%和10.2%。耳鸣严重程度与头晕呈分级相关(模型4趋势p = 0.003)。与无耳鸣组相比,中度和重度耳鸣组在完全调整后出现头晕的几率更高(OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.33-2.20; OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.75-3.39)。焦虑严重程度和感知到的压力与头晕独立相关,对这些因素的调整使中度和重度耳鸣的耳鸣-头晕关联减弱了约9%和19%。结论:耳鸣严重程度与头晕呈分级独立相关。心理困扰也与头晕有关,并在一定程度上减弱了这种关系,这支持了在评估头晕时将听觉和心理因素结合起来的临床方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书