Cardiac autonomic regulation across the menstrual cycle is highly individual: evidence from phase-aligned cyclic generalized additive mixed models.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Marcelle Schaffarczyk, Lucie Rückemann, Billy Sperlich, Thomas Gronwald
{"title":"Cardiac autonomic regulation across the menstrual cycle is highly individual: evidence from phase-aligned cyclic generalized additive mixed models.","authors":"Marcelle Schaffarczyk, Lucie Rückemann, Billy Sperlich, Thomas Gronwald","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00028.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac autonomic regulation, indexed by heart rate variability (HRV), is hypothesized to fluctuate across the menstrual cycle. Empirical findings remain inconsistent, likely due to sparse phase-based sampling and limited consideration of interindividual variability. This study examined cyclic HRV trajectories using longitudinal monitoring and phase-aligned cycle time scaling (PACTS) to distinguish population-level from individual-specific patterns and to evaluate associations with well-being. Daily HRV (smartphone photoplethysmography) and well-being were collected in 21 naturally cycling women. Cycle time was aligned using PACTS, with ovulation set to 0 and follicular and luteal phases rescaled to a common -1 to +1 interval. Vagally mediated HRV was indexed using log-transformed root mean square of successive differences [ln(RMSSD)] and the coefficient of variation (CV) of ln(RMSSD), calculated from a centered rolling window. Cyclic generalized additive mixed models separated population-level smooths from participant-specific cyclic deviations. Associations between well-being (sleep quality, stress, fatigue, and muscle soreness) and HRV were examined using mixed-effects models distinguishing within- and between-person effects. For ln(RMSSD), the population-level cyclic trajectory was flat and nonsignificant, whereas participant-specific cyclic deviations were significant, indicating pronounced interindividual heterogeneity despite a stable average pattern. Similar results were observed for CV ln(RMSSD). Within-person analyses showed that poorer sleep quality, higher stress, and greater fatigue were associated with lower ln(RMSSD), whereas between-person differences were unrelated to mean HRV. Increases in stress and muscle soreness were associated with modest increases in HRV fluctuations. When menstrual cycle timing is precisely aligned to ovulation, vagally mediated HRV shows no consistent population-level rhythm but marked individual-specific dynamics, strongly modulated by day-to-day well-being.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Using dense longitudinal monitoring and ovulation-aligned cycle scaling, this study shows that vagally mediated heart rate variability does not follow a consistent population-level rhythm across the menstrual cycle. Instead, cardiac autonomic regulation exhibits pronounced individual-specific cyclic patterns and is strongly influenced by day-to-day fluctuations in subjective well-being. These findings help explain previously inconsistent menstrual cycle effects on heart rate variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":" ","pages":"R623-R630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00028.2026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac autonomic regulation, indexed by heart rate variability (HRV), is hypothesized to fluctuate across the menstrual cycle. Empirical findings remain inconsistent, likely due to sparse phase-based sampling and limited consideration of interindividual variability. This study examined cyclic HRV trajectories using longitudinal monitoring and phase-aligned cycle time scaling (PACTS) to distinguish population-level from individual-specific patterns and to evaluate associations with well-being. Daily HRV (smartphone photoplethysmography) and well-being were collected in 21 naturally cycling women. Cycle time was aligned using PACTS, with ovulation set to 0 and follicular and luteal phases rescaled to a common -1 to +1 interval. Vagally mediated HRV was indexed using log-transformed root mean square of successive differences [ln(RMSSD)] and the coefficient of variation (CV) of ln(RMSSD), calculated from a centered rolling window. Cyclic generalized additive mixed models separated population-level smooths from participant-specific cyclic deviations. Associations between well-being (sleep quality, stress, fatigue, and muscle soreness) and HRV were examined using mixed-effects models distinguishing within- and between-person effects. For ln(RMSSD), the population-level cyclic trajectory was flat and nonsignificant, whereas participant-specific cyclic deviations were significant, indicating pronounced interindividual heterogeneity despite a stable average pattern. Similar results were observed for CV ln(RMSSD). Within-person analyses showed that poorer sleep quality, higher stress, and greater fatigue were associated with lower ln(RMSSD), whereas between-person differences were unrelated to mean HRV. Increases in stress and muscle soreness were associated with modest increases in HRV fluctuations. When menstrual cycle timing is precisely aligned to ovulation, vagally mediated HRV shows no consistent population-level rhythm but marked individual-specific dynamics, strongly modulated by day-to-day well-being.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using dense longitudinal monitoring and ovulation-aligned cycle scaling, this study shows that vagally mediated heart rate variability does not follow a consistent population-level rhythm across the menstrual cycle. Instead, cardiac autonomic regulation exhibits pronounced individual-specific cyclic patterns and is strongly influenced by day-to-day fluctuations in subjective well-being. These findings help explain previously inconsistent menstrual cycle effects on heart rate variability.

整个月经周期的心脏自主调节是高度个体化的:来自相位对齐循环广义加性混合模型的证据。
心脏自主调节,由心率变异性(HRV)索引,假设在月经周期波动。实证结果仍然不一致,可能是由于稀疏的基于阶段的抽样和有限的考虑个体间的可变性。本研究使用纵向监测和相位对齐周期时间尺度(PACTS)检查了循环HRV轨迹,以区分群体水平和个体特定模式,并评估与幸福感的关联。收集了21名自然骑行女性的每日HRV(智能手机光容积脉搏波)和幸福感。使用PACTS调整周期时间,将排卵期设置为0,将卵泡期和黄体期重新调整为常见的-1至+1间隔。迷走神经介导的HRV使用对数变换RMSSD (ln(RMSSD))和ln(RMSSD)的变异系数(CV)进行索引,从中心滚动窗口计算。循环广义加性混合模型将群体水平的平滑从参与者特定的循环偏差中分离出来。幸福感(睡眠质量、压力、疲劳、肌肉酸痛)和心率变异之间的关联使用混合效应模型进行了检验,区分了人体内和人之间的影响。对于ln(RMSSD),种群水平的循环轨迹平坦且不显著,而参与者特定的循环偏差显著,表明尽管有稳定的平均模式,但个体间存在明显的异质性。CV ln(RMSSD)也观察到类似的结果。人内分析表明,较差的睡眠质量、较高的压力和较强的疲劳与较低的ln(RMSSD)相关,而人与人之间的差异与平均HRV无关。压力和肌肉酸痛的增加与心率波动的适度增加有关。当月经周期时间与排卵精确一致时,迷走神经介导的HRV显示不一致的人群水平节律,而是明显的个体特异性动态,受日常健康状况的强烈调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
145
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书