Late-Onset Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes After Normal Mid-Pregnancy Screening in Women with Large for Gestational Age or Polyhydramnios: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Omri Dominsky, Roza Berkovitz-Shperling, Michal Rosenberg-Fridman, Daniel Gabbai, Shai Ram, Yariv Yogev
{"title":"Late-Onset Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes After Normal Mid-Pregnancy Screening in Women with Large for Gestational Age or Polyhydramnios: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Omri Dominsky, Roza Berkovitz-Shperling, Michal Rosenberg-Fridman, Daniel Gabbai, Shai Ram, Yariv Yogev","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2026.04.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the detection rate of late-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and associated perinatal outcomes in women with normal mid-pregnancy glucose screening who undergo repeat oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) due to suspected large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses or polyhydramnios.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2010 to November 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>We included cohort studies reporting late GDM detection rates in women with documented normal mid-pregnancy glucose testing (negative glucose challenge test or normal 75g OGTT at 24-28 weeks) who underwent repeat OGTT after 28 weeks due to sonographic findings of suspected LGA or polyhydramnios. We excluded studies of women with pre-existing diabetes, those lacking documented normal mid-pregnancy screening, and those examining routine late testing without specific clinical indication.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled detection rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed by clinical indication, timing of testing, initial screening method (two-step vs one-step), and maternal BMI. Perinatal outcomes were compared using pooled odds ratios calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six cohort studies including 2,166 women met inclusion criteria. The pooled detection rate was 15.0% (95% CI: 9.9-21.0%; I<sup>2</sup>=91%). Detection rates varied significantly by indication: suspected LGA 20.8% (95% CI: 17.4-24.6%) vs. isolated polyhydramnios 4.8% (95% CI: 2.0-10.8%). Women with late-onset GDM had significantly higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.18-2.81), overall cesarean delivery (OR 2.00; 95% CI: 1.47-2.72), elective cesarean for LGA/macrosomia (OR 3.37; 95% CI: 2.01-5.64), emergent cesarean (OR 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05-2.57), and induction of labor (OR 2.27; 95% CI: 1.32-3.89). Macrosomia by birth weight and LGA at delivery were not significantly elevated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Late OGTT detects GDM in approximately one in six women with normal mid-pregnancy screening who develop LGA or polyhydramnios. Late-onset GDM is associated with significantly increased neonatal hypoglycemia and cesarean delivery, with the largest effect for elective cesarean for suspected LGA/macrosomia. These findings may inform clinical decision-making regarding repeat glucose testing in the third trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2026.04.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the detection rate of late-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and associated perinatal outcomes in women with normal mid-pregnancy glucose screening who undergo repeat oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) due to suspected large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses or polyhydramnios.

Data sources: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2010 to November 2024.

Study eligibility criteria: We included cohort studies reporting late GDM detection rates in women with documented normal mid-pregnancy glucose testing (negative glucose challenge test or normal 75g OGTT at 24-28 weeks) who underwent repeat OGTT after 28 weeks due to sonographic findings of suspected LGA or polyhydramnios. We excluded studies of women with pre-existing diabetes, those lacking documented normal mid-pregnancy screening, and those examining routine late testing without specific clinical indication.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled detection rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed by clinical indication, timing of testing, initial screening method (two-step vs one-step), and maternal BMI. Perinatal outcomes were compared using pooled odds ratios calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results: Six cohort studies including 2,166 women met inclusion criteria. The pooled detection rate was 15.0% (95% CI: 9.9-21.0%; I2=91%). Detection rates varied significantly by indication: suspected LGA 20.8% (95% CI: 17.4-24.6%) vs. isolated polyhydramnios 4.8% (95% CI: 2.0-10.8%). Women with late-onset GDM had significantly higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.18-2.81), overall cesarean delivery (OR 2.00; 95% CI: 1.47-2.72), elective cesarean for LGA/macrosomia (OR 3.37; 95% CI: 2.01-5.64), emergent cesarean (OR 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05-2.57), and induction of labor (OR 2.27; 95% CI: 1.32-3.89). Macrosomia by birth weight and LGA at delivery were not significantly elevated.

Conclusions: Late OGTT detects GDM in approximately one in six women with normal mid-pregnancy screening who develop LGA or polyhydramnios. Late-onset GDM is associated with significantly increased neonatal hypoglycemia and cesarean delivery, with the largest effect for elective cesarean for suspected LGA/macrosomia. These findings may inform clinical decision-making regarding repeat glucose testing in the third trimester.

大胎龄或羊水过多妇女妊娠中期正常筛查后迟发性妊娠糖尿病的诊断:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:探讨妊娠中期葡萄糖筛查正常的孕妇因怀疑胎龄大(LGA)或羊水过多而进行重复口服糖耐量试验(OGTT)的晚发型妊娠糖尿病(GDM)检出率及相关围产儿结局。数据来源:我们系统地检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索了2010年1月至2024年11月发表的研究。研究资格标准:我们纳入了报告妊娠中期血糖检测正常(24-28周葡萄糖刺激试验阴性或75g OGTT正常)的妇女的晚期GDM检出率的队列研究,这些妇女在28周后因超声发现疑似LGA或羊水过多而重复OGTT。我们排除了既往患有糖尿病的妇女,缺乏正常妊娠中期筛查记录的妇女,以及没有特定临床指征的常规晚期检查妇女的研究。研究评价和综合方法:采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。采用随机效应荟萃分析计算95%置信区间的合并检出率。根据临床适应证、检测时间、初始筛查方法(两步vs一步)和母亲BMI进行亚组分析。围产期结局采用Mantel-Haenszel方法计算的合并优势比进行比较。结果:6项队列研究包括2166名女性符合纳入标准。合并检出率为15.0% (95% CI: 9.9 ~ 21.0%; I2=91%)。不同适应症的检出率差异显著:疑似LGA 20.8% (95% CI: 17.4-24.6%)与分离性羊水过多4.8% (95% CI: 2.0-10.8%)。迟发性GDM妇女的新生儿低血糖(OR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.18-2.81)、整体剖宫产(OR 2.00; 95% CI: 1.47-2.72)、LGA/巨大儿择期剖宫产(OR 3.37; 95% CI: 2.01-5.64)、紧急剖宫产(OR 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05-2.57)和引产(OR 2.27; 95% CI: 1.32-3.89)的发生率显著较高。巨大儿的出生体重和分娩时LGA没有显著升高。结论:晚期OGTT在妊娠中期正常筛查的LGA或羊水过多的妇女中约有六分之一检测到GDM。迟发性GDM与新生儿低血糖和剖宫产显著增加相关,其中对疑似LGA/巨大儿的选择性剖宫产影响最大。这些发现可能会对妊娠晚期重复血糖检测的临床决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书