Brent M Egan, Jiexiang Li, Susan E Sutherland, Michael K Rakotz
{"title":"Healthcare insurance status and hypertension control before and after the Affordable Care Act.","authors":"Brent M Egan, Jiexiang Li, Susan E Sutherland, Michael K Rakotz","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpag036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood pressure control among adults <65 years old with public, private, or no healthcare insurance after the US 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were analyzed pre- (2001-2010) and post-ACA (2015-2023) on adults aged 20-64 years (pre-Medicare eligibility) with hypertension (systolic ≥140 or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or antihypertensive therapy). Relationships of blood pressure control (<140/<90 mmHg) to healthcare insurance and social determinants (race/ethnicity, low income [<200% federal poverty]) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among adults 20-64 years with hypertension pre- vs post-ACA, the uninsured (17.2% vs 11.4%) and the privately insured declined (64.3% vs 56.0%), while the publicly insured increased (16.2% vs 28.5%). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults comprised lower percentages of privately than publicly or uninsured adults, respectively, pre-ACA (18.9% vs 37.3%, 42.4%) and post-ACA (24.1% vs 38.3%, 50.3%). Low incomes were less frequent for privately insured adults than for publicly insured or uninsured adults, respectively, pre-ACA (13.0% vs 64.4%, 64.9%) and post-ACA (11.3% vs 67.6%, 63.1%). Blood pressure control was not different pre-ACA for publicly and privately insured adults (54.3% vs 50.4%, P = .064) and lower among uninsured adults (30.5%) than both insured groups, with a similar pattern post-ACA (54.5% [public], 50.2% [private], 30.3% [uninsured]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this US population-based study, blood pressure control was not different for publicly and privately insured adults pre- and post-ACA, although lower for uninsured adults. Public healthcare insurance appeared to continue mitigating the effects of adverse social determinants on blood pressure control post-ACA, despite the increase in publicly insured adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1013-1020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13369954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpag036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Blood pressure control among adults <65 years old with public, private, or no healthcare insurance after the US 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) is unknown.
Methods: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were analyzed pre- (2001-2010) and post-ACA (2015-2023) on adults aged 20-64 years (pre-Medicare eligibility) with hypertension (systolic ≥140 or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or antihypertensive therapy). Relationships of blood pressure control (<140/<90 mmHg) to healthcare insurance and social determinants (race/ethnicity, low income [<200% federal poverty]) were assessed.
Results: Among adults 20-64 years with hypertension pre- vs post-ACA, the uninsured (17.2% vs 11.4%) and the privately insured declined (64.3% vs 56.0%), while the publicly insured increased (16.2% vs 28.5%). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults comprised lower percentages of privately than publicly or uninsured adults, respectively, pre-ACA (18.9% vs 37.3%, 42.4%) and post-ACA (24.1% vs 38.3%, 50.3%). Low incomes were less frequent for privately insured adults than for publicly insured or uninsured adults, respectively, pre-ACA (13.0% vs 64.4%, 64.9%) and post-ACA (11.3% vs 67.6%, 63.1%). Blood pressure control was not different pre-ACA for publicly and privately insured adults (54.3% vs 50.4%, P = .064) and lower among uninsured adults (30.5%) than both insured groups, with a similar pattern post-ACA (54.5% [public], 50.2% [private], 30.3% [uninsured]).
Conclusions: In this US population-based study, blood pressure control was not different for publicly and privately insured adults pre- and post-ACA, although lower for uninsured adults. Public healthcare insurance appeared to continue mitigating the effects of adverse social determinants on blood pressure control post-ACA, despite the increase in publicly insured adults.
方法:对20-64岁(pre- medicare资格)高血压(收缩压≥140或舒张压≥90 mmHg,或接受降压治疗)的成年人(2001-2010年)和aca后(2015-2023年)进行全国健康和营养调查。血压控制关系(结果:在20-64岁高血压患者中,aca实施前和aca实施后,未参保(17.2%比11.4%)和私人参保的比例下降(64.3%比56.0%),而公共参保的比例上升(16.2%比28.5%)。非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔成年人分别在aca实施前(18.9% vs. 37.3%, 42.4%)和aca实施后(24.1% vs. 38.3%, 50.3%),私人参保比例低于公共参保或未参保的成年人。在aca实施前(13.0%比64.4%,64.9%)和aca实施后(11.3%比67.6%,63.1%),私营部门低收入的频率低于公共部门或未参保的成年人。在aca实施前,公共保险和私人保险成年人的血压控制没有差异(54.3% vs. 50.4%, P =。在没有保险的成年人中(30.5%)低于aca后模式相似的两个保险群体(54.5%[公共],50.2%[私人],30.3%[未保险])。结论:在这项以美国人群为基础的研究中,在aca之前和之后,公共保险和私人保险的成年人的血压控制没有区别,尽管没有保险的成年人的血压控制较低。公共医疗保险似乎继续减轻不良社会决定因素对aca后血压控制的影响,尽管公共保险的成年人有所增加。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.