Enhancing the Information Needs of Patients With Colostomy: A Comparative Study of Tailored Versus Standard Training Methods.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000457
Aslihan Öztürk Çetin, Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen
{"title":"Enhancing the Information Needs of Patients With Colostomy: A Comparative Study of Tailored Versus Standard Training Methods.","authors":"Aslihan Öztürk Çetin, Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preoperative education forms a cornerstone in nursing practice in the holistic care of surgical patients. This is particularly crucial for patients undergoing surgical procedures involving colostomy, where the provision of comprehensive information can significantly impact both the perioperative and postoperative phases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of 2 distinct methods in addressing the information needs of patients with colostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a case-control design. The sample included 60 patients (control: 30; intervention: 30) undergoing stoma procedures in the general surgery service of a university hospital who willingly participated in the study. The control group received standard training from a wound care nurse, whereas the intervention group received tailored training based on identified requirements. This study compared the effectiveness of education provided to patients in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before training, the control group had an average patient learning needs score of 195.24±21.56 points, which was significantly lower than the intervention group's score of 221.66±20.25 points. Posttraining, the control group's mean score increased to 202.82±20.86 points, whereas the intervention group's score rose to 239.46±9.44 points. Following training, significant differences were found between the control and intervention groups in subdimensions such as medications, life activities, society, follow-up, feelings about disease conditions, treatment, complications, and quality of life ( P <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High learning needs were identified in patients with colostomy during the perioperative period. It was observed that individualized education significantly improved the level of meeting the needs of the patients, emphasizing the importance of personalized education in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"273-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Preoperative education forms a cornerstone in nursing practice in the holistic care of surgical patients. This is particularly crucial for patients undergoing surgical procedures involving colostomy, where the provision of comprehensive information can significantly impact both the perioperative and postoperative phases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of 2 distinct methods in addressing the information needs of patients with colostomy.

Methods: The study employed a case-control design. The sample included 60 patients (control: 30; intervention: 30) undergoing stoma procedures in the general surgery service of a university hospital who willingly participated in the study. The control group received standard training from a wound care nurse, whereas the intervention group received tailored training based on identified requirements. This study compared the effectiveness of education provided to patients in both groups.

Results: Before training, the control group had an average patient learning needs score of 195.24±21.56 points, which was significantly lower than the intervention group's score of 221.66±20.25 points. Posttraining, the control group's mean score increased to 202.82±20.86 points, whereas the intervention group's score rose to 239.46±9.44 points. Following training, significant differences were found between the control and intervention groups in subdimensions such as medications, life activities, society, follow-up, feelings about disease conditions, treatment, complications, and quality of life ( P <.05).

Conclusions: High learning needs were identified in patients with colostomy during the perioperative period. It was observed that individualized education significantly improved the level of meeting the needs of the patients, emphasizing the importance of personalized education in this context.

提高结肠造口患者的信息需求:定制与标准训练方法的比较研究。
目的:术前教育是外科病人整体护理的基石。这对于接受结肠造口手术的患者尤其重要,因为提供全面的信息可以显著影响围手术期和术后阶段。本研究旨在探讨两种不同的方法在解决结肠造口患者信息需求方面的影响。方法:采用病例-对照设计。样本包括60名自愿参加研究的大学附属医院普通外科造口手术患者(对照组30名,干预组30名)。对照组接受伤口护理护士的标准培训,而干预组则根据确定的要求接受量身定制的培训。本研究比较了两组患者接受教育的效果。结果:训练前,对照组患者学习需求平均得分为195.24±21.56分,显著低于干预组的221.66±20.25分。训练后,对照组平均得分为202.82±20.86分,干预组平均得分为239.46±9.44分。训练结束后,对照组与干预组在药物治疗、生活活动、社交、随访、病情感受、治疗、并发症、生活质量等子维度上存在显著差异(p结论:结肠造口患者围手术期存在较高的学习需求。观察到个性化教育显著提高了满足患者需求的水平,强调了个性化教育在这一背景下的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书