Using Demand Analysis to Examine Private Practice Mental Health Providers’ Decision to Accept Health Insurance

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kyler R. Lehrbach, Briana S. Last, Elizabeth Rawa, Daniel Zweben, Danielle R. Adams, Donald A. Hantula, Aden Littlewood, Philip C. Kendall, Margaret E. Crane
{"title":"Using Demand Analysis to Examine Private Practice Mental Health Providers’ Decision to Accept Health Insurance","authors":"Kyler R. Lehrbach,&nbsp;Briana S. Last,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rawa,&nbsp;Daniel Zweben,&nbsp;Danielle R. Adams,&nbsp;Donald A. Hantula,&nbsp;Aden Littlewood,&nbsp;Philip C. Kendall,&nbsp;Margaret E. Crane","doi":"10.1007/s10488-026-01507-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Less than half of insured Americans can access mental health care due to a variety of barriers, including low provider participation in insurance networks. Providers report insufficient reimbursement rates and administrative burdens as reasons they do not accept insurance. We examined the importance of these barriers and the extent to which reimbursement rates would need to increase for private practice providers to accept insurance. Private practice mental health providers (i.e., psychologists, marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and social workers) completed an online survey containing two behavioral economic tasks. In the <i>Criteria Ranking Task</i>, providers (<i>n</i> = 326) ranked barriers that most deterred them from accepting insurance, reporting insufficient reimbursement rates as the most important, followed by administrative burdens. In the <i>Hypothetical Demand Task</i>, providers indicated the likelihood of accepting Medicare at various reimbursement rate increases with and without hypothetical administrative assistance. Participants indicated they would accept insurance following 83% rate increases (P<sub>max</sub> = $188.97) for doctoral providers (<i>n</i> = 188) and 118% rate increases (P<sub>max</sub> = $168.51) for master’s-level providers (<i>n</i> = 112). If provided administrative assistance, participants indicated they would accept insurance following 100% rate increases (P<sub>max</sub> = $206.28) for doctoral providers and 169% rate increases (P<sub>max</sub> = $207.90) for master’s-level providers. Results support existing research findings that insufficient reimbursement rates and administrative burdens are the primary barriers to mental health providers accepting insurance. Policy efforts to increase access to mental healthcare must consider the incentives and burdens that impact providers and their decision to accept insurance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"53 4","pages":"451 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10488-026-01507-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-026-01507-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Less than half of insured Americans can access mental health care due to a variety of barriers, including low provider participation in insurance networks. Providers report insufficient reimbursement rates and administrative burdens as reasons they do not accept insurance. We examined the importance of these barriers and the extent to which reimbursement rates would need to increase for private practice providers to accept insurance. Private practice mental health providers (i.e., psychologists, marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and social workers) completed an online survey containing two behavioral economic tasks. In the Criteria Ranking Task, providers (n = 326) ranked barriers that most deterred them from accepting insurance, reporting insufficient reimbursement rates as the most important, followed by administrative burdens. In the Hypothetical Demand Task, providers indicated the likelihood of accepting Medicare at various reimbursement rate increases with and without hypothetical administrative assistance. Participants indicated they would accept insurance following 83% rate increases (Pmax = $188.97) for doctoral providers (n = 188) and 118% rate increases (Pmax = $168.51) for master’s-level providers (n = 112). If provided administrative assistance, participants indicated they would accept insurance following 100% rate increases (Pmax = $206.28) for doctoral providers and 169% rate increases (Pmax = $207.90) for master’s-level providers. Results support existing research findings that insufficient reimbursement rates and administrative burdens are the primary barriers to mental health providers accepting insurance. Policy efforts to increase access to mental healthcare must consider the incentives and burdens that impact providers and their decision to accept insurance.

Abstract Image

用需求分析检验私人执业心理健康提供者接受健康保险的决定。
由于各种障碍,包括医疗服务提供者在保险网络中的参与度较低,只有不到一半的有保险的美国人能够获得精神卫生保健服务。医疗服务提供者报告说,他们不接受保险的原因是报销率不足和行政负担。我们研究了这些障碍的重要性,以及私人诊所接受保险需要增加报销率的程度。私人执业心理健康提供者(即心理学家、婚姻和家庭治疗师、心理健康咨询师和社会工作者)完成了一项包含两项行为经济学任务的在线调查。在标准排名任务中,医疗服务提供者(n = 326)对阻碍他们接受保险的障碍进行了排名,最重要的是报告报销率不足,其次是行政负担。在假设的需求任务中,医疗服务提供者指出了在有和没有假设的行政援助的情况下,接受医疗保险的各种报销率增加的可能性。参与者表示,如果博士(n = 188)和硕士(n = 112)的费率分别上涨83% (Pmax = 188.97美元)和118% (Pmax = 168.51美元),他们将接受保险。如果提供行政援助,参与者表示,他们将接受博士学位提供者100%的费率增长(Pmax = 206.28美元)和硕士学位提供者169%的费率增长(Pmax = 207.90美元)。结果支持现有的研究结果,即补偿率不足和行政负担是精神卫生提供者接受保险的主要障碍。增加获得精神保健的机会的政策努力必须考虑影响提供者及其接受保险决定的动机和负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书