{"title":"A Zone-Specific, Minimally Invasive Approach with a Rotary Cutting System for Moderate-to-Severe Fibrotic Buffalo Hump.","authors":"Renpeng Zhou, Boyan Li, Angang Ding, Yonggan Zhu, Chen Wang, Danru Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00266-026-05883-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump remains challenging, as current treatment options range from minimally invasive but suboptimal techniques to invasive open procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel zone-specific surgical strategy using a rotary cutting system for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 56 patients with fibrotic buffalo hump. A zone-specific strategy was employed: The avascular central zone (Zone I) was resected using a rotary cutting system, while the vascular-rich peripheral zone (Zone II) was managed with blunt dissection and liposuction. Outcomes were assessed using an observer-rated 4-point aesthetic scale and the patient-reported Neck Extension Mobility Score (NEMS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up duration was 8 months. Most patients (92.9%, 52/56) achieved \"Good\" or \"Excellent\" aesthetic outcomes. Functional improvement was significant postoperatively, with the proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe mobility restrictions (NEMS 3-4) dropping from 69.6% preoperatively to 5.4% postoperatively. Complications were minor, primarily transient numbness (25.0%), with a 3.6% seroma rate and no instances of hematoma or infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The zone-specific application of a rotary cutting system is a safe and effective advanced minimally invasive option for moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump, potentially bridging the therapeutic gap between minimally invasive and open procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-026-05883-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The management of moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump remains challenging, as current treatment options range from minimally invasive but suboptimal techniques to invasive open procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel zone-specific surgical strategy using a rotary cutting system for this condition.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 56 patients with fibrotic buffalo hump. A zone-specific strategy was employed: The avascular central zone (Zone I) was resected using a rotary cutting system, while the vascular-rich peripheral zone (Zone II) was managed with blunt dissection and liposuction. Outcomes were assessed using an observer-rated 4-point aesthetic scale and the patient-reported Neck Extension Mobility Score (NEMS).
Results: The mean follow-up duration was 8 months. Most patients (92.9%, 52/56) achieved "Good" or "Excellent" aesthetic outcomes. Functional improvement was significant postoperatively, with the proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe mobility restrictions (NEMS 3-4) dropping from 69.6% preoperatively to 5.4% postoperatively. Complications were minor, primarily transient numbness (25.0%), with a 3.6% seroma rate and no instances of hematoma or infection.
Conclusion: The zone-specific application of a rotary cutting system is a safe and effective advanced minimally invasive option for moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump, potentially bridging the therapeutic gap between minimally invasive and open procedures.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.