A Zone-Specific, Minimally Invasive Approach with a Rotary Cutting System for Moderate-to-Severe Fibrotic Buffalo Hump.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Renpeng Zhou, Boyan Li, Angang Ding, Yonggan Zhu, Chen Wang, Danru Wang
{"title":"A Zone-Specific, Minimally Invasive Approach with a Rotary Cutting System for Moderate-to-Severe Fibrotic Buffalo Hump.","authors":"Renpeng Zhou, Boyan Li, Angang Ding, Yonggan Zhu, Chen Wang, Danru Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00266-026-05883-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump remains challenging, as current treatment options range from minimally invasive but suboptimal techniques to invasive open procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel zone-specific surgical strategy using a rotary cutting system for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 56 patients with fibrotic buffalo hump. A zone-specific strategy was employed: The avascular central zone (Zone I) was resected using a rotary cutting system, while the vascular-rich peripheral zone (Zone II) was managed with blunt dissection and liposuction. Outcomes were assessed using an observer-rated 4-point aesthetic scale and the patient-reported Neck Extension Mobility Score (NEMS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up duration was 8 months. Most patients (92.9%, 52/56) achieved \"Good\" or \"Excellent\" aesthetic outcomes. Functional improvement was significant postoperatively, with the proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe mobility restrictions (NEMS 3-4) dropping from 69.6% preoperatively to 5.4% postoperatively. Complications were minor, primarily transient numbness (25.0%), with a 3.6% seroma rate and no instances of hematoma or infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The zone-specific application of a rotary cutting system is a safe and effective advanced minimally invasive option for moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump, potentially bridging the therapeutic gap between minimally invasive and open procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-026-05883-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump remains challenging, as current treatment options range from minimally invasive but suboptimal techniques to invasive open procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel zone-specific surgical strategy using a rotary cutting system for this condition.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 56 patients with fibrotic buffalo hump. A zone-specific strategy was employed: The avascular central zone (Zone I) was resected using a rotary cutting system, while the vascular-rich peripheral zone (Zone II) was managed with blunt dissection and liposuction. Outcomes were assessed using an observer-rated 4-point aesthetic scale and the patient-reported Neck Extension Mobility Score (NEMS).

Results: The mean follow-up duration was 8 months. Most patients (92.9%, 52/56) achieved "Good" or "Excellent" aesthetic outcomes. Functional improvement was significant postoperatively, with the proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe mobility restrictions (NEMS 3-4) dropping from 69.6% preoperatively to 5.4% postoperatively. Complications were minor, primarily transient numbness (25.0%), with a 3.6% seroma rate and no instances of hematoma or infection.

Conclusion: The zone-specific application of a rotary cutting system is a safe and effective advanced minimally invasive option for moderate-to-severe fibrotic buffalo hump, potentially bridging the therapeutic gap between minimally invasive and open procedures.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

旋转切割系统的区域特异性微创入路治疗中重度纤维性水牛驼峰。
背景:中度至重度纤维性水牛驼峰的治疗仍然具有挑战性,因为目前的治疗选择从微创但次优的技术到侵入性开放手术。本研究旨在评估一种新的区域特异性手术策略的有效性和安全性,该策略使用旋转切割系统治疗这种疾病。方法:对56例水牛驼峰纤维化患者进行回顾性队列研究。采用特定区域的策略:使用旋转切割系统切除无血管的中心区域(I区),而血管丰富的周围区域(II区)通过钝性剥离和吸脂进行处理。使用观察者评定的4点美学量表和患者报告的颈部伸展活动评分(NEMS)评估结果。结果:平均随访时间8个月。大多数患者(92.9%,52/56)获得“良好”或“优秀”的美学结果。术后功能改善显著,出现中度至重度活动受限(NEMS 3-4)的患者比例从术前的69.6%降至术后的5.4%。并发症轻微,主要是短暂性麻木(25.0%),血肿率为3.6%,无血肿或感染病例。结论:针对特定区域应用旋转切割系统是一种安全有效的高级微创治疗中度至重度纤维化水牛驼峰的选择,有可能弥合微创和开放手术之间的治疗差距。证据等级iv:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书