Long-term disinfection of 3D-printed denture resin: physical and biological in vitro assessments.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amanda C Ferro, Caroline C de Oliveira, Bárbara L Morais, Jonatas S de Oliveira, Rodolfo D Piazza, Rodrigo F C Marques, Carlos Mota, Matthew B Baker, Janaina H Jorge
{"title":"Long-term disinfection of 3D-printed denture resin: physical and biological in vitro assessments.","authors":"Amanda C Ferro, Caroline C de Oliveira, Bárbara L Morais, Jonatas S de Oliveira, Rodolfo D Piazza, Rodrigo F C Marques, Carlos Mota, Matthew B Baker, Janaina H Jorge","doi":"10.1007/s10856-026-07049-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effects of prolonged overnight immersion in disinfectant solutions on the physical and biological properties of 3D-printed and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials. Four solutions were tested: distilled water (control), 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate, and a disinfectant soap (Lifebuoy®). Daily cycles of 8 h in disinfectant solutions and 16 h in distilled water were performed for up to 6 months to represent overnight disinfection and daily use. The evaluated parameters included color change, water contact angle, Vickers hardness, surface roughness and topography, residual antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans biofilm, and cytotoxicity in L-929 cells. Color change remained within clinically acceptable thresholds for all groups, with Lifebuoy® showing values comparable to the control. Water contact angles decreased after immersion, while surface roughness was stable up to 3 months and decreased at 6 months, particularly in PMMA. Hardness increased in heat-polymerized specimens, whereas 3D-printed materials showed greater stability over time. 3D-printed resins exhibited higher C. albicans biofilm formation than PMMA. Chlorhexidine digluconate resulted in the greatest reduction in fungal growth and metabolic activity, followed by sodium hypochlorite and Lifebuoy®. Most groups showed no cytotoxic effects, except for moderate cytotoxicity of chlorhexidine at 3 months. In conclusion, 3D-printed resin showed superior physical performance, while PMMA demonstrated lower Candida colonization. Chlorhexidine was the most effective antibiofilm agent despite time-dependent cytotoxicity, while Lifebuoy® served as a non-cytotoxic alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-026-07049-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of prolonged overnight immersion in disinfectant solutions on the physical and biological properties of 3D-printed and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials. Four solutions were tested: distilled water (control), 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate, and a disinfectant soap (Lifebuoy®). Daily cycles of 8 h in disinfectant solutions and 16 h in distilled water were performed for up to 6 months to represent overnight disinfection and daily use. The evaluated parameters included color change, water contact angle, Vickers hardness, surface roughness and topography, residual antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans biofilm, and cytotoxicity in L-929 cells. Color change remained within clinically acceptable thresholds for all groups, with Lifebuoy® showing values comparable to the control. Water contact angles decreased after immersion, while surface roughness was stable up to 3 months and decreased at 6 months, particularly in PMMA. Hardness increased in heat-polymerized specimens, whereas 3D-printed materials showed greater stability over time. 3D-printed resins exhibited higher C. albicans biofilm formation than PMMA. Chlorhexidine digluconate resulted in the greatest reduction in fungal growth and metabolic activity, followed by sodium hypochlorite and Lifebuoy®. Most groups showed no cytotoxic effects, except for moderate cytotoxicity of chlorhexidine at 3 months. In conclusion, 3D-printed resin showed superior physical performance, while PMMA demonstrated lower Candida colonization. Chlorhexidine was the most effective antibiofilm agent despite time-dependent cytotoxicity, while Lifebuoy® served as a non-cytotoxic alternative.

3d打印义齿树脂的长期消毒:体外物理和生物评价
本研究评估了在消毒剂溶液中长时间浸泡过夜对3d打印和热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基托材料的物理和生物性能的影响。测试了四种溶液:蒸馏水(对照)、1%次氯酸钠、2%二光酸氯己定和消毒皂(Lifebuoy®)。在消毒剂溶液中进行8小时的每日循环,在蒸馏水中进行16小时,持续长达6个月,以代表过夜消毒和日常使用。评价参数包括颜色变化、水接触角、维氏硬度、表面粗糙度和形貌、对白色念珠菌生物膜的残留抗菌活性和L-929细胞的细胞毒性。所有组的颜色变化保持在临床可接受的阈值范围内,Lifebuoy®显示的值与对照组相当。水接触角在浸泡后下降,而表面粗糙度在3个月内保持稳定,在6个月时下降,特别是在PMMA中。硬度在热聚合样品中增加,而3d打印材料随着时间的推移显示出更大的稳定性。3d打印树脂比PMMA具有更高的白色念珠菌生物膜形成率。二光酸氯己定导致真菌生长和代谢活性的最大降低,次氯酸钠和Lifebuoy®紧随其后。除氯己定在3个月时出现中度细胞毒性外,大多数组均无细胞毒性作用。总之,3d打印树脂具有优越的物理性能,而PMMA具有较低的念珠菌定植。尽管有时间依赖性的细胞毒性,氯己定是最有效的抗生物膜剂,而Lifebuoy®是一种无细胞毒性的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine publishes refereed papers providing significant progress in the application of biomaterials and tissue engineering constructs as medical or dental implants, prostheses and devices. Coverage spans a wide range of topics from basic science to clinical applications, around the theme of materials in medicine and dentistry. The central element is the development of synthetic and natural materials used in orthopaedic, maxillofacial, cardiovascular, neurological, ophthalmic and dental applications. Special biomedical topics include biomaterial synthesis and characterisation, biocompatibility studies, nanomedicine, tissue engineering constructs and cell substrates, regenerative medicine, computer modelling and other advanced experimental methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书