Revealing the network structure characteristics and driving factors of carbon-emission spillovers in the greater bay area of China: a coupled multi-scenario analytical framework
{"title":"Revealing the network structure characteristics and driving factors of carbon-emission spillovers in the greater bay area of China: a coupled multi-scenario analytical framework","authors":"Zhigang Li, Jiapei Tan","doi":"10.1186/s13021-026-00445-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is a critical region for coordinated low-carbon development in China, yet the structure and drivers of intercity carbon-emission spillovers remain poorly understood, especially under alternative development pathways. In addition, the carbon consequences of land-use change have received little attention. To fill these gaps, this study develops a coupled multi-scenario analytical framework to examine the spillover structure and drivers of land-use carbon emissions (LUCE), using observational data from 2000, 2010, and 2020, together with 2030 simulations under natural development (NDS), economic development (EDS), and ecological protection (EPS) scenarios. The results show that the northeastern and southwestern GBA function as relatively stable carbon sinks, whereas the central corridor exhibits persistent emission growth. Intercity LUCE disparities are largest under EDS and shrink markedly under EPS. The LUCE network is highly connected, multilevel, and transmission-efficient, indicating a robust yet centralized spillover system. Shenzhen remains the dominant hub, and the increasing number of intermediary cities further strengthens intercity carbon flows. Driver analysis reveals that historical network linkages are significantly associated with differences in per capita GDP and geographic proximity. Under the 2030 scenarios, however, industrial structure upgrading becomes increasingly influential, highlighting a scenario-dependent shift in the key drivers of intercity spillovers. Overall, this study offers a transferable multi-scenario framework for analyzing regional LUCE spillovers and provides management-relevant evidence for coordinated mitigation, cross-jurisdictional carbon governance, and policy design in the GBA.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13021-026-00445-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-026-00445-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is a critical region for coordinated low-carbon development in China, yet the structure and drivers of intercity carbon-emission spillovers remain poorly understood, especially under alternative development pathways. In addition, the carbon consequences of land-use change have received little attention. To fill these gaps, this study develops a coupled multi-scenario analytical framework to examine the spillover structure and drivers of land-use carbon emissions (LUCE), using observational data from 2000, 2010, and 2020, together with 2030 simulations under natural development (NDS), economic development (EDS), and ecological protection (EPS) scenarios. The results show that the northeastern and southwestern GBA function as relatively stable carbon sinks, whereas the central corridor exhibits persistent emission growth. Intercity LUCE disparities are largest under EDS and shrink markedly under EPS. The LUCE network is highly connected, multilevel, and transmission-efficient, indicating a robust yet centralized spillover system. Shenzhen remains the dominant hub, and the increasing number of intermediary cities further strengthens intercity carbon flows. Driver analysis reveals that historical network linkages are significantly associated with differences in per capita GDP and geographic proximity. Under the 2030 scenarios, however, industrial structure upgrading becomes increasingly influential, highlighting a scenario-dependent shift in the key drivers of intercity spillovers. Overall, this study offers a transferable multi-scenario framework for analyzing regional LUCE spillovers and provides management-relevant evidence for coordinated mitigation, cross-jurisdictional carbon governance, and policy design in the GBA.
期刊介绍:
Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle.
The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community.
This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system.
Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.