Elasticity Range Addresses Global Patterns of Plant Drought Resistance.

IF 6.9 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant, Cell & Environment Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.1111/pce.70562
Zeyu Lin, Dayong Fan, Zijian Guo, Xiangping Wang
{"title":"Elasticity Range Addresses Global Patterns of Plant Drought Resistance.","authors":"Zeyu Lin, Dayong Fan, Zijian Guo, Xiangping Wang","doi":"10.1111/pce.70562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elastic adjustment enables turgor maintenance under drought, yet its potential as a reliable predictor of species-level drought resistance remains controversial due to the static nature of traditional metrics. This study investigates the variation in cell wall elastic properties across a global dataset, introducing the \"Elasticity Safety Range\"-defined as [Ln (ε<sub>max</sub>/ε<sub>mean</sub>)]-as a dynamic functional indicator, where ε<sub>max</sub> and ε<sub>mean</sub> represent the maximum and mean elastic modulus, respectively. Unlike the ε<sub>max</sub>, this index captures the capacity for reversible elastic modulation required to maintain turgor under stress. We found that the Elasticity Safety Range was more strongly correlated with climate aridity than traditional ε<sub>max</sub> and ε<sub>mean</sub>, revealing a fundamental divergence in survival strategies. Specifically, evergreen species exhibited a widened safety range under aridity, reflecting a \"Persistence Strategy\" to protect expensive foliage through active cell wall softening. In contrast, deciduous species showed a diminished or negligible range in arid conditions, consistent with a \"Phenological Avoidance\" strategy (leaf shedding). Our findings demonstrate that the Elasticity Safety Range offers novel insights into the trade-off between structural investment and physiological regulation, providing a robust tool for assessing plant vulnerability to climate intensification.</p>","PeriodicalId":222,"journal":{"name":"Plant, Cell & Environment","volume":" ","pages":"5580-5589"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13353697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant, Cell & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elastic adjustment enables turgor maintenance under drought, yet its potential as a reliable predictor of species-level drought resistance remains controversial due to the static nature of traditional metrics. This study investigates the variation in cell wall elastic properties across a global dataset, introducing the "Elasticity Safety Range"-defined as [Ln (εmax/εmean)]-as a dynamic functional indicator, where εmax and εmean represent the maximum and mean elastic modulus, respectively. Unlike the εmax, this index captures the capacity for reversible elastic modulation required to maintain turgor under stress. We found that the Elasticity Safety Range was more strongly correlated with climate aridity than traditional εmax and εmean, revealing a fundamental divergence in survival strategies. Specifically, evergreen species exhibited a widened safety range under aridity, reflecting a "Persistence Strategy" to protect expensive foliage through active cell wall softening. In contrast, deciduous species showed a diminished or negligible range in arid conditions, consistent with a "Phenological Avoidance" strategy (leaf shedding). Our findings demonstrate that the Elasticity Safety Range offers novel insights into the trade-off between structural investment and physiological regulation, providing a robust tool for assessing plant vulnerability to climate intensification.

弹性范围研究植物抗旱性的全球模式。
弹性调节能够在干旱条件下维持膨胀,但由于传统指标的静态性质,其作为物种水平抗旱性可靠预测指标的潜力仍然存在争议。本研究调查了全球数据集中细胞壁弹性特性的变化,引入了“弹性安全范围”(定义为[Ln (εmax/εmean)])作为动态功能指标,其中εmax和εmean分别代表最大和平均弹性模量。与εmax不同的是,该指标捕获了在应力下保持膨胀所需的可逆弹性调制能力。研究发现,相对于传统的εmax和εmean,弹性安全区间与气候干旱的相关性更强,这表明它们的生存策略存在根本性差异。具体来说,常绿植物在干旱条件下表现出更大的安全范围,反映了一种“持久性策略”,通过活跃的细胞壁软化来保护昂贵的叶片。相比之下,落叶物种在干旱条件下表现出减少或可以忽略不计的范围,这与“物候回避”策略(叶片脱落)一致。我们的研究结果表明,弹性安全范围为结构投资和生理调节之间的权衡提供了新的见解,为评估植物对气候加剧的脆弱性提供了一个强大的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant, Cell & Environment
Plant, Cell & Environment 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
253
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Plant, Cell & Environment is a premier plant science journal, offering valuable insights into plant responses to their environment. Committed to publishing high-quality theoretical and experimental research, the journal covers a broad spectrum of factors, spanning from molecular to community levels. Researchers exploring various aspects of plant biology, physiology, and ecology contribute to the journal's comprehensive understanding of plant-environment interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书