Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Fracture Risk: A Systematic Literature Review and Pooled and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Manar Elsayed, Brianna Greenwood, Xiaoming Wang, Liz Dennett, Carrie Ye
{"title":"Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Fracture Risk: A Systematic Literature Review and Pooled and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Manar Elsayed, Brianna Greenwood, Xiaoming Wang, Liz Dennett, Carrie Ye","doi":"10.1093/jbmr/zjag074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are indicated for numerous malignancies, but may have off-target effects called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Fractures are not considered irAEs, but ICIs may promote osteoclast activation, leading to fractures. This study aimed to evaluate fracture risk associated with ICI therapy using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic literature review of phase II and III ICI RCTs in individuals with solid malignancies that reported fractures in PubMed and Embase from inception to September 25, 2024. Supplementary materials were reviewed for all eligible studies to ascertain fracture outcomes. Fractures were categorized as any fracture, osteoporotic, and pathologic. Pooled analysis, random-effects meta-analysis, and multivariate meta-regression were conducted to determine the overall risk of fracture in ICI users compared to non-ICI users. Two subgroup analyses were performed: (1) studies without an active comparator, and (2) studies without an active comparator and ≥ 6 months of ICI treatment. A total of 35 RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n = 23,404 patients). There were 91 fractures in ICI groups (66 osteoporotic and 5 pathologic), compared with 70 fractures in the controls (49 osteoporotic and 5 pathologic). Pooled analysis showed no significant association between ICI therapy and risk of any fracture (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80-1.50, p = 0.54), osteoporotic fracture (1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, p = 0.48), or pathologic fracture (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.26-2.73, p = 0.79). Meta-analysis similarly showed no statistically significant differences. Meta-regression did not identify any variables associated with increased fracture risk. Statistical heterogeneity was non-significant (I2 = 0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in reported fractures between ICI and non-ICI treatment groups. However, few studies reported fracture outcomes and observation periods for these studies were short. Longer-term comprehensive fracture-adverse-event reporting in ICI RCTs is needed to evaluate fracture risk in ICI users.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjag074","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are indicated for numerous malignancies, but may have off-target effects called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Fractures are not considered irAEs, but ICIs may promote osteoclast activation, leading to fractures. This study aimed to evaluate fracture risk associated with ICI therapy using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic literature review of phase II and III ICI RCTs in individuals with solid malignancies that reported fractures in PubMed and Embase from inception to September 25, 2024. Supplementary materials were reviewed for all eligible studies to ascertain fracture outcomes. Fractures were categorized as any fracture, osteoporotic, and pathologic. Pooled analysis, random-effects meta-analysis, and multivariate meta-regression were conducted to determine the overall risk of fracture in ICI users compared to non-ICI users. Two subgroup analyses were performed: (1) studies without an active comparator, and (2) studies without an active comparator and ≥ 6 months of ICI treatment. A total of 35 RCTs met the inclusion criteria (n = 23,404 patients). There were 91 fractures in ICI groups (66 osteoporotic and 5 pathologic), compared with 70 fractures in the controls (49 osteoporotic and 5 pathologic). Pooled analysis showed no significant association between ICI therapy and risk of any fracture (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80-1.50, p = 0.54), osteoporotic fracture (1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, p = 0.48), or pathologic fracture (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.26-2.73, p = 0.79). Meta-analysis similarly showed no statistically significant differences. Meta-regression did not identify any variables associated with increased fracture risk. Statistical heterogeneity was non-significant (I2 = 0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in reported fractures between ICI and non-ICI treatment groups. However, few studies reported fracture outcomes and observation periods for these studies were short. Longer-term comprehensive fracture-adverse-event reporting in ICI RCTs is needed to evaluate fracture risk in ICI users.

免疫检查点抑制剂与骨折风险:随机对照试验的系统文献综述和汇总和荟萃分析。
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)适用于许多恶性肿瘤,但可能具有脱靶效应,称为免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。骨折不被认为是irae,但ICIs可能促进破骨细胞活化,导致骨折。本研究旨在利用随机对照试验(RCTs)的数据评估ICI治疗相关的骨折风险。我们对PubMed和Embase从开始到2024年9月25日报道的实体恶性肿瘤患者骨折的II期和III期ICI随机对照试验进行了系统的文献综述。我们对所有符合条件的研究的补充资料进行了回顾,以确定骨折的结局。骨折分为骨折、骨质疏松和病理性骨折。通过汇总分析、随机效应荟萃分析和多变量荟萃回归来确定ICI使用者与非ICI使用者的骨折总风险。进行了两个亚组分析:(1)没有有效比较剂的研究,(2)没有有效比较剂且ICI治疗≥6个月的研究。共有35项rct符合纳入标准(n = 23404例患者)。ICI组有91例骨折(66例骨质疏松,5例病理性),而对照组有70例骨折(49例骨质疏松,5例病理性)。综合分析显示,ICI治疗与任何骨折(OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80-1.50, p = 0.54)、骨质疏松性骨折(OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, p = 0.48)或病理性骨折(OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.26-2.73, p = 0.79)的风险均无显著相关性。荟萃分析同样显示无统计学显著差异。meta回归没有发现任何与骨折风险增加相关的变量。统计学异质性不显著(I2 = 0.0%)。在ICI治疗组和非ICI治疗组之间报告的骨折没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,很少有研究报道骨折的结果,而且这些研究的观察期很短。需要在ICI随机对照试验中进行长期综合的骨折不良事件报告,以评估ICI使用者的骨折风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书