The feasibility of mindfulness-based relapse prevention for adults with substance use disorders (illicit drugs) in a Chinese population: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2026-04-30 DOI:10.1111/add.70441
Ka Tsun Ting, Ivan Chun Him Leung, Dicken Cheong Chun Chan, Ken On Tai Yu, Wai Kwong Tang, Fu Chan, Alan Ka Lam Tang, Helen Shuk Wah Ma, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip, Daisy Dexing Zhang, Sarah Bowen, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
{"title":"The feasibility of mindfulness-based relapse prevention for adults with substance use disorders (illicit drugs) in a Chinese population: A pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ka Tsun Ting, Ivan Chun Him Leung, Dicken Cheong Chun Chan, Ken On Tai Yu, Wai Kwong Tang, Fu Chan, Alan Ka Lam Tang, Helen Shuk Wah Ma, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip, Daisy Dexing Zhang, Sarah Bowen, Samuel Yeung Shan Wong","doi":"10.1111/add.70441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) has been shown to be beneficial to individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) in the West. The current pilot study aimed at testing the feasibility of MBRP in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This pilot study adopted a design of randomized controlled trial comparing MBRP with treatment-as-usual group (TAU).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants were recruited from residential detox centers, community addiction counseling centers and substance abuse clinics specialized addiction treatment clinics in Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 81 adults (85.2% male) with SUD (illicit drugs only) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The intervention group participants (n = 41) attended a 1-hour orientation session followed by 2-hour weekly MBRP sessions for 8 weeks, delivered by a qualified MBRP teacher. The TAU group participants (n = 40) continued their service received from their referral agency. (After completion of all study assessments they were offered the same 8-week MBRP course.) MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility was measured by attendance, course satisfaction and retention rate. Participants' change in substance use and other related outcomes were captured by self-reported drug use, urine drug tests and a list of psychometric scales at baseline, immediately after MBRP and 3- and 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The MBRP course satisfaction was high, and the attendance (57.4%) and retention rates (63.4%-85.4%) were comparable to previous trials. No statistically significant differences were observed between the MBRP and TAU groups for any outcomes, including craving, depression, anxiety, mindfulness and health-related quality of life; however, improvement trends were noticed in the MBRP group in self-efficacy in managing high-risk situations at post intervention, as well as in addiction severity and psychological flexibility at the 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mindfulness-based relapse prevention was shown to be feasible for substance use disorder treatment in a Chinese population. In this small study there was only limited evidence of abstinence efficacy, and no evidence of a benefit on other secondary outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) has been shown to be beneficial to individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) in the West. The current pilot study aimed at testing the feasibility of MBRP in a Chinese population.

Design: This pilot study adopted a design of randomized controlled trial comparing MBRP with treatment-as-usual group (TAU).

Setting: Participants were recruited from residential detox centers, community addiction counseling centers and substance abuse clinics specialized addiction treatment clinics in Hong Kong.

Participants: A total of 81 adults (85.2% male) with SUD (illicit drugs only) were recruited.

Interventions: The intervention group participants (n = 41) attended a 1-hour orientation session followed by 2-hour weekly MBRP sessions for 8 weeks, delivered by a qualified MBRP teacher. The TAU group participants (n = 40) continued their service received from their referral agency. (After completion of all study assessments they were offered the same 8-week MBRP course.) MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility was measured by attendance, course satisfaction and retention rate. Participants' change in substance use and other related outcomes were captured by self-reported drug use, urine drug tests and a list of psychometric scales at baseline, immediately after MBRP and 3- and 6-month follow-up.

Findings: The MBRP course satisfaction was high, and the attendance (57.4%) and retention rates (63.4%-85.4%) were comparable to previous trials. No statistically significant differences were observed between the MBRP and TAU groups for any outcomes, including craving, depression, anxiety, mindfulness and health-related quality of life; however, improvement trends were noticed in the MBRP group in self-efficacy in managing high-risk situations at post intervention, as well as in addiction severity and psychological flexibility at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: Mindfulness-based relapse prevention was shown to be feasible for substance use disorder treatment in a Chinese population. In this small study there was only limited evidence of abstinence efficacy, and no evidence of a benefit on other secondary outcomes.

正念预防中国成年人药物使用障碍(非法药物)复发的可行性:一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:在西方,以正念为基础的复发预防(MBRP)已被证明对物质使用障碍(SUD)患者有益。目前的试点研究旨在测试MBRP在中国人群中的可行性。设计:本先导研究采用随机对照试验设计,将MBRP组与常规治疗组(TAU)进行比较。研究对象来自香港的住宅戒毒中心、社区戒毒咨询中心和药物滥用诊所。参与者:共招募81名患有SUD(仅限非法药物)的成年人(85.2%)。干预措施:干预组参与者(n = 41)参加了一个1小时的培训课程,随后是每周2小时的MBRP课程,为期8周,由一位合格的MBRP老师授课。TAU组参与者(n = 40)继续接受转介机构的服务。(在完成所有研究评估后,他们被提供相同的8周MBRP课程。)测量方法:可行性通过出勤率、课程满意度和保留率来衡量。在MBRP和3个月和6个月的随访后,通过自我报告的药物使用、尿液药物测试和一系列基线心理测量量表来捕获参与者在药物使用和其他相关结果方面的变化。结果:MBRP课程满意度高,出勤率(57.4%)和留学率(63.4% ~ 85.4%)与既往试验相当。MBRP组和TAU组之间的任何结果,包括渴望、抑郁、焦虑、正念和与健康相关的生活质量,都没有统计学上的显著差异;然而,在干预后,MBRP组在处理高风险情况的自我效能以及6个月的随访中,成瘾严重程度和心理灵活性均有改善趋势。结论:在中国人群中,以正念为基础的复发预防在药物使用障碍治疗中是可行的。在这项小型研究中,只有有限的证据表明禁欲有效,没有证据表明对其他次要结果有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书