A comparative study on the effect of GMAW welding current on the performance of API 5 L GrB pipeline steel welds for oil and gas industrial applications

IF 5 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Akan Peter , James Mutua , Japheth Obiko , Joshua Ngoret
{"title":"A comparative study on the effect of GMAW welding current on the performance of API 5 L GrB pipeline steel welds for oil and gas industrial applications","authors":"Akan Peter ,&nbsp;James Mutua ,&nbsp;Japheth Obiko ,&nbsp;Joshua Ngoret","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reliability of oil and gas transportation depends heavily on weld quality during pipeline construction. This study investigates the effect of gas metal arc welding (GMAW) current on API 5 L GrB pipeline weld joint. Welding experiments were conducted using currents from 140 A to 170 A, at constant voltage of 22 V and welding speed of 6 m/min. Finite Element Modelling (FEM) simulations were performed using Simufact Welding 6.0 software to compare with experimental data. Results showed that an increase in welding current improved penetration depth (91.35% to 124.95%) and weld width (15.17 mm to 16.12 mm), before declining to 12.32 mm at 170 A. 170 A caused undercutting and sagging, while 140 A resulted in incomplete penetration. Microstructural analysis revealed grain coarsening at higher currents, with acicular ferrite dominating the fusion zone and mixed ferrite morphologies in the HAZ. The fusion zone at 170 A exhibited a micro-hardness of 260 HV<sub>0.3</sub>, exceeding the 248 HV<sub>0.3</sub> limit for API 5 L GrB, increasing susceptibility to hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) and stress-corrosion cracking (SCC). Residual stress shifted from −228 ± 7.5 MPa in the base metal to −268.73 ± 8.5 MPa at 150 A, then decreased to −182.7 ± 13.4 MPa at 160 A and −118.3 ± 13 MPa at 170 A. Simulation results closely matched the experiment, with deviations of 6.72%, 4.08%, and 12% for weld width, depth, and residual stress, respectively. The study supports the combined utilisation of physical and computational tools to optimise pipeline welding performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100360"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143325001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reliability of oil and gas transportation depends heavily on weld quality during pipeline construction. This study investigates the effect of gas metal arc welding (GMAW) current on API 5 L GrB pipeline weld joint. Welding experiments were conducted using currents from 140 A to 170 A, at constant voltage of 22 V and welding speed of 6 m/min. Finite Element Modelling (FEM) simulations were performed using Simufact Welding 6.0 software to compare with experimental data. Results showed that an increase in welding current improved penetration depth (91.35% to 124.95%) and weld width (15.17 mm to 16.12 mm), before declining to 12.32 mm at 170 A. 170 A caused undercutting and sagging, while 140 A resulted in incomplete penetration. Microstructural analysis revealed grain coarsening at higher currents, with acicular ferrite dominating the fusion zone and mixed ferrite morphologies in the HAZ. The fusion zone at 170 A exhibited a micro-hardness of 260 HV0.3, exceeding the 248 HV0.3 limit for API 5 L GrB, increasing susceptibility to hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) and stress-corrosion cracking (SCC). Residual stress shifted from −228 ± 7.5 MPa in the base metal to −268.73 ± 8.5 MPa at 150 A, then decreased to −182.7 ± 13.4 MPa at 160 A and −118.3 ± 13 MPa at 170 A. Simulation results closely matched the experiment, with deviations of 6.72%, 4.08%, and 12% for weld width, depth, and residual stress, respectively. The study supports the combined utilisation of physical and computational tools to optimise pipeline welding performance.
GMAW焊接电流对石油天然气工业用API 5l GrB管线钢焊缝性能影响的对比研究
在管道施工过程中,焊接质量的好坏直接关系到油气运输的可靠性。研究了气体保护金属电弧焊电流对API 5l GrB管道焊接接头的影响。焊接实验在电流为140 ~ 170 A,电压为22 V,焊接速度为6 m/min的条件下进行。采用Simufact Welding 6.0软件进行有限元模拟,并与实验数据进行对比。结果表明:增大焊接电流可提高焊深(91.35% ~ 124.95%)和焊缝宽度(15.17 mm ~ 16.12 mm),但在170 A时焊缝宽度下降至12.32 mm, 170 A时出现凹切和凹陷,而140 A时出现不完全焊透;显微组织分析显示,在高电流下晶粒粗化,熔合区以针状铁素体为主,热影响区呈混合铁素体形态。170 A熔合区的显微硬度为260 HV0.3,超过API 5 L GrB的极限248 HV0.3,增加了氢致开裂(HIC)和应力腐蚀开裂(SCC)的敏感性。残余应力在150 A时从母材的- 228±7.5 MPa下降到- 268.73±8.5 MPa,在160 A和170 A时分别下降到- 182.7±13.4 MPa和- 118.3±13 MPa。模拟结果与实验结果吻合较好,焊缝宽度、焊缝深度和残余应力的偏差分别为6.72%、4.08%和12%。该研究支持综合利用物理和计算工具来优化管道焊接性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书