Prescription tradeoff decision support for pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy: From templates to artificial intelligence models

Q1 Health Professions
Radiation Medicine and Protection Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.radmp.2026.03.004
Yibo Xie , Manisha Palta , Ruilin Li , Wentao Wang , Qiuwen Wu , Yaorong Ge , Q. Jackie Wu , Yang Sheng
{"title":"Prescription tradeoff decision support for pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy: From templates to artificial intelligence models","authors":"Yibo Xie ,&nbsp;Manisha Palta ,&nbsp;Ruilin Li ,&nbsp;Wentao Wang ,&nbsp;Qiuwen Wu ,&nbsp;Yaorong Ge ,&nbsp;Q. Jackie Wu ,&nbsp;Yang Sheng","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2026.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) driven plan tradeoff decision making assistant for radiation oncologists<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A user interface (UI) was developed to integrate the assistant with the treatment planning system to facilitate prescription decision process. The assistant is powered by a machine learning core which was trained to learn the balance between planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing. A group of 98 pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases were retrospectively included for this study. The clinical plan's PTV coverage was compared against the model predicted value. A 10-fold cross validation was performed for all cases. The comparison was further analyzed in detail for three attending physicians. Cases with large discrepancy were identified and analyzed, and a replan was created to evaluate the achievability of the prediction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The clinical plan PTV <em>V</em><sub>100%</sub> was (87.7 ± 14.5)% while the model predicted value was (90.5 ± 9.6)%. Model agreement discrepancy was observed between attending physicians. Among all 98 cases, 9 were identified with large variation from the model prediction. For the replans, an average of 15.3% improvement was achieved over the original clinical plan, while OARs constrains were met.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The assistant's decision provides decent plan quality guidance for prescription drafting. It could provide valuable input prior to treatment planning and save valuable dosimetrist team and radiation oncologist effort. It could further provide valuable insight for resident education and training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555726000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) driven plan tradeoff decision making assistant for radiation oncologists.

Methods

A user interface (UI) was developed to integrate the assistant with the treatment planning system to facilitate prescription decision process. The assistant is powered by a machine learning core which was trained to learn the balance between planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing. A group of 98 pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases were retrospectively included for this study. The clinical plan's PTV coverage was compared against the model predicted value. A 10-fold cross validation was performed for all cases. The comparison was further analyzed in detail for three attending physicians. Cases with large discrepancy were identified and analyzed, and a replan was created to evaluate the achievability of the prediction.

Results

The clinical plan PTV V100% was (87.7 ± 14.5)% while the model predicted value was (90.5 ± 9.6)%. Model agreement discrepancy was observed between attending physicians. Among all 98 cases, 9 were identified with large variation from the model prediction. For the replans, an average of 15.3% improvement was achieved over the original clinical plan, while OARs constrains were met.

Conclusions

The assistant's decision provides decent plan quality guidance for prescription drafting. It could provide valuable input prior to treatment planning and save valuable dosimetrist team and radiation oncologist effort. It could further provide valuable insight for resident education and training.
胰腺立体定向放射治疗的处方权衡决策支持:从模板到人工智能模型
目的开发一种人工智能驱动的放射肿瘤学家方案权衡决策助手。方法开发用户界面(UI),将助手与治疗计划系统集成,方便处方决策。该助手由一个机器学习核心提供动力,该核心经过训练,可以学习计划目标体积(PTV)覆盖范围和危险器官(OAR)保护之间的平衡。本研究回顾性分析了98例胰腺立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)病例。将临床方案的PTV覆盖率与模型预测值进行比较。对所有病例进行10倍交叉验证。并对3名主治医师进行了详细的比较分析。对差异较大的案例进行了识别和分析,并创建了一个重新计划来评估预测的可实现性。结果临床计划PTV V100%为(87.7±14.5)%,模型预测值为(90.5±9.6)%。在主治医师之间观察到模型一致性差异。在所有98例病例中,9例与模型预测存在较大差异。对于重新计划,在满足OARs约束的情况下,平均比原始临床计划提高15.3%。结论该助手的决策为处方制定提供了较好的方案质量指导。它可以在治疗计划之前提供有价值的信息,节省剂量师团队和放射肿瘤学家的宝贵精力。这将进一步为住院医师教育和培训提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书