Soo Lim, Linong Ji, Kwang Wei Tham, Anoop Misra, Takashi Kadowaki
{"title":"Clinical obesity in Asian people: bridging the gap between adiposity and disease","authors":"Soo Lim, Linong Ji, Kwang Wei Tham, Anoop Misra, Takashi Kadowaki","doi":"10.1038/s41574-026-01239-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Perspective argues for a reconceptualization of clinical obesity in Asian populations, moving beyond BMI-centric definitions towards an adiposity-based and function-based framework. Asian populations exhibit a distinctive obesity phenotype, characterized by excess visceral and ectopic adipose tissue accumulation, reduced β-cell reserve, sarcopenic obesity and heightened cardiometabolic risk at lower BMI thresholds than for white European and North American populations, leading to systematic under-recognition of obesity-related disease when conventional criteria are applied. Building on the Lancet Commission’s framework for defining and diagnosing clinical obesity, we propose an integrated approach that combines anthropometric measures, body composition assessment, metabolic and organ-specific markers and emerging biomarkers to distinguish preclinical obesity from clinical obesity on the basis of organ dysfunction and functional impairment. This approach improves risk stratification, supports earlier and more precise diagnosis and informs stage-specific management, including lifestyle intervention, pharmacotherapy and metabolic surgery, particularly in Asian populations. We discuss implications for clinical practice, prevention strategies and public health policy, emphasizing the need to align clinical guidelines, reimbursement systems and education with a function-based definition of obesity. Finally, we highlight key research priorities, including validation of biomarker-driven classifications, assessment of long-term clinical and economic outcomes and development of scalable diagnostic tools, to advance precision care and metabolic health equity across diverse Asian populations. The need to consider factors beyond BMI to accurately assess metabolic dysfunction when diagnosing and treating obesity is increasingly recognized. In this Perspective, Lim and colleagues advocate for an approach to assessments for obesity in Asian populations that takes ethnicity-specific factors into account.","PeriodicalId":18916,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Endocrinology","volume":"22 10","pages":"615-624"},"PeriodicalIF":39.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41574-026-01239-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This Perspective argues for a reconceptualization of clinical obesity in Asian populations, moving beyond BMI-centric definitions towards an adiposity-based and function-based framework. Asian populations exhibit a distinctive obesity phenotype, characterized by excess visceral and ectopic adipose tissue accumulation, reduced β-cell reserve, sarcopenic obesity and heightened cardiometabolic risk at lower BMI thresholds than for white European and North American populations, leading to systematic under-recognition of obesity-related disease when conventional criteria are applied. Building on the Lancet Commission’s framework for defining and diagnosing clinical obesity, we propose an integrated approach that combines anthropometric measures, body composition assessment, metabolic and organ-specific markers and emerging biomarkers to distinguish preclinical obesity from clinical obesity on the basis of organ dysfunction and functional impairment. This approach improves risk stratification, supports earlier and more precise diagnosis and informs stage-specific management, including lifestyle intervention, pharmacotherapy and metabolic surgery, particularly in Asian populations. We discuss implications for clinical practice, prevention strategies and public health policy, emphasizing the need to align clinical guidelines, reimbursement systems and education with a function-based definition of obesity. Finally, we highlight key research priorities, including validation of biomarker-driven classifications, assessment of long-term clinical and economic outcomes and development of scalable diagnostic tools, to advance precision care and metabolic health equity across diverse Asian populations. The need to consider factors beyond BMI to accurately assess metabolic dysfunction when diagnosing and treating obesity is increasingly recognized. In this Perspective, Lim and colleagues advocate for an approach to assessments for obesity in Asian populations that takes ethnicity-specific factors into account.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Endocrinology aspires to be the foremost platform for reviews and commentaries catering to the scientific communities it serves. The journal aims to publish articles characterized by authority, accessibility, and clarity, enhanced with easily understandable figures, tables, and other visual aids. The goal is to offer an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, striving to maximize the usefulness and impact of each article. Nature Reviews Endocrinology publishes Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives relevant to researchers and clinicians in the fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Its broad scope ensures that the work it publishes reaches the widest possible audience.