Johannes Zeilinger,Stefan Palkovits,Manuel Ruiss,Caroline Pilwachs,Philipp Necpal,Ava Elahi,Oliver Findl
{"title":"Intra-individual Comparison of Two Refractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Designs.","authors":"Johannes Zeilinger,Stefan Palkovits,Manuel Ruiss,Caroline Pilwachs,Philipp Necpal,Ava Elahi,Oliver Findl","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2026.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo compare intra-individual differences in visual performance of two non-diffractive refractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) targeted for emmetropia.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nProspective, randomized, patient-and examiner-masked intra-individual comparative study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nForty patients (80 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of refractive EDF IOL in each eye: a wavefront-shaped refractive EDF IOL (DEN00V, Johnson and Johnson Vision) in one eye and a sector-segmented EDF IOL (AN6V, Teleon) in the fellow eye. After 3 months, monocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA) intermediate (DIVA/UIVA), and near (DNVA/UNVA) visual acuity, refractive outcomes, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, halometry, and subjective visual quality using questionnaires were compared.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) mean UDVA at 4m, DIVA at 66cm and UDNVA at 40cm were 0.05±0.10, 0.17±0.11 and 0.31±0.11 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.06±0.10, 0.15±0.10 and 0.32±0.11 logMAR for the AN6V respectively with no significant differences. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint, UIVA, with 0.18±0.13 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.12±0.09 logMAR for the AN6V. Nominal differences were observed for CDVA and UNVA with 0.01±0.07 and 0.32±0.12 logMAR for the DEN00V and -0.02±0.07 (p=0.01), and 0.25±0.10 (p=0.01) logMAR for the AN6V, respectively. Further nominal differences could be shown for contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. However, these differences did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBoth IOLs demonstrated and extended range of functional vision, preserved contrast sensitivity, and minimal photopic phenomena. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint UIVA, favouring the AN6V.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2026.04.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare intra-individual differences in visual performance of two non-diffractive refractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) targeted for emmetropia.
DESIGN
Prospective, randomized, patient-and examiner-masked intra-individual comparative study.
METHODS
Forty patients (80 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of refractive EDF IOL in each eye: a wavefront-shaped refractive EDF IOL (DEN00V, Johnson and Johnson Vision) in one eye and a sector-segmented EDF IOL (AN6V, Teleon) in the fellow eye. After 3 months, monocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA) intermediate (DIVA/UIVA), and near (DNVA/UNVA) visual acuity, refractive outcomes, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, halometry, and subjective visual quality using questionnaires were compared.
RESULTS
In thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) mean UDVA at 4m, DIVA at 66cm and UDNVA at 40cm were 0.05±0.10, 0.17±0.11 and 0.31±0.11 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.06±0.10, 0.15±0.10 and 0.32±0.11 logMAR for the AN6V respectively with no significant differences. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint, UIVA, with 0.18±0.13 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.12±0.09 logMAR for the AN6V. Nominal differences were observed for CDVA and UNVA with 0.01±0.07 and 0.32±0.12 logMAR for the DEN00V and -0.02±0.07 (p=0.01), and 0.25±0.10 (p=0.01) logMAR for the AN6V, respectively. Further nominal differences could be shown for contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. However, these differences did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS
Both IOLs demonstrated and extended range of functional vision, preserved contrast sensitivity, and minimal photopic phenomena. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint UIVA, favouring the AN6V.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.