Intra-individual Comparison of Two Refractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Designs.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Johannes Zeilinger,Stefan Palkovits,Manuel Ruiss,Caroline Pilwachs,Philipp Necpal,Ava Elahi,Oliver Findl
{"title":"Intra-individual Comparison of Two Refractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Designs.","authors":"Johannes Zeilinger,Stefan Palkovits,Manuel Ruiss,Caroline Pilwachs,Philipp Necpal,Ava Elahi,Oliver Findl","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2026.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo compare intra-individual differences in visual performance of two non-diffractive refractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) targeted for emmetropia.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nProspective, randomized, patient-and examiner-masked intra-individual comparative study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nForty patients (80 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of refractive EDF IOL in each eye: a wavefront-shaped refractive EDF IOL (DEN00V, Johnson and Johnson Vision) in one eye and a sector-segmented EDF IOL (AN6V, Teleon) in the fellow eye. After 3 months, monocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA) intermediate (DIVA/UIVA), and near (DNVA/UNVA) visual acuity, refractive outcomes, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, halometry, and subjective visual quality using questionnaires were compared.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) mean UDVA at 4m, DIVA at 66cm and UDNVA at 40cm were 0.05±0.10, 0.17±0.11 and 0.31±0.11 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.06±0.10, 0.15±0.10 and 0.32±0.11 logMAR for the AN6V respectively with no significant differences. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint, UIVA, with 0.18±0.13 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.12±0.09 logMAR for the AN6V. Nominal differences were observed for CDVA and UNVA with 0.01±0.07 and 0.32±0.12 logMAR for the DEN00V and -0.02±0.07 (p=0.01), and 0.25±0.10 (p=0.01) logMAR for the AN6V, respectively. Further nominal differences could be shown for contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. However, these differences did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBoth IOLs demonstrated and extended range of functional vision, preserved contrast sensitivity, and minimal photopic phenomena. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint UIVA, favouring the AN6V.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2026.04.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE To compare intra-individual differences in visual performance of two non-diffractive refractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) targeted for emmetropia. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, patient-and examiner-masked intra-individual comparative study. METHODS Forty patients (80 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of refractive EDF IOL in each eye: a wavefront-shaped refractive EDF IOL (DEN00V, Johnson and Johnson Vision) in one eye and a sector-segmented EDF IOL (AN6V, Teleon) in the fellow eye. After 3 months, monocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA) intermediate (DIVA/UIVA), and near (DNVA/UNVA) visual acuity, refractive outcomes, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, halometry, and subjective visual quality using questionnaires were compared. RESULTS In thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) mean UDVA at 4m, DIVA at 66cm and UDNVA at 40cm were 0.05±0.10, 0.17±0.11 and 0.31±0.11 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.06±0.10, 0.15±0.10 and 0.32±0.11 logMAR for the AN6V respectively with no significant differences. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint, UIVA, with 0.18±0.13 logMAR for the DEN00V and 0.12±0.09 logMAR for the AN6V. Nominal differences were observed for CDVA and UNVA with 0.01±0.07 and 0.32±0.12 logMAR for the DEN00V and -0.02±0.07 (p=0.01), and 0.25±0.10 (p=0.01) logMAR for the AN6V, respectively. Further nominal differences could be shown for contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. However, these differences did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS Both IOLs demonstrated and extended range of functional vision, preserved contrast sensitivity, and minimal photopic phenomena. A statistically significant difference was observed for the primary endpoint UIVA, favouring the AN6V.
两种屈光扩展焦深人工晶体设计的个体内比较。
目的比较两种非衍射型屈光深度人工晶状体(iol)治疗远视的个体内视力差异。前瞻性、随机、患者和检查者匿名的个体内比较研究。方法40例(80眼)双侧年龄相关性白内障行超声乳化术,单眼行波前形屈光EDF人工晶状体植入术(DEN00V, Johnson and Johnson Vision),另眼行节段EDF人工晶状体植入术(AN6V, Teleon)。3个月后,通过问卷比较单眼矫正距离和未矫正距离(CDVA/UDVA)、中间距离(DIVA/UIVA)和近距离(DNVA/UNVA)视力、屈光结果、离焦曲线、对比敏感度、光饱和度和主观视觉质量。结果37例(74眼)患者中,DEN00V的平均4m处UDVA、66cm处DIVA和40cm处UDNVA分别为0.05±0.10、0.17±0.11和0.31±0.11 logMAR, AN6V的平均值分别为0.06±0.10、0.15±0.10和0.32±0.11 logMAR,差异无统计学意义。主要终点UIVA的差异有统计学意义,DEN00V为0.18±0.13 logMAR, AN6V为0.12±0.09 logMAR。DEN00V的CDVA和UNVA的logMAR分别为0.01±0.07和0.32±0.12 (p=0.01), AN6V的logMAR分别为-0.02±0.07 (p=0.01)和0.25±0.10 (p=0.01)。进一步的名义差异可以显示在光和介观条件下的对比灵敏度。然而,经过多次比较调整后,这些差异在统计学上并不显著。结论两种人工晶状体均表现出并扩大了功能视力范围,保持了对比灵敏度,并减少了光现象。在主要终点UIVA上观察到统计学上显著的差异,有利于AN6V。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书