{"title":"The effects of educational robotics on students’ learning outcomes: A three-level meta-analysis","authors":"Yanqun Lu , Shengnan Geng","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational robotics has been extensively employed to support students' learning. Although the effect of educational robotics on students' learning has been widely examined, extant empirical studies have reported contradictory conclusions. A comprehensive meta-analytic study was conducted to examine the effects of educational robotics on students' learning outcomes across various educational levels and school subjects and explore potential application-related, interaction-related, research-related moderators of the effects. A total of 108 effect sizes from 58 studies (<em>N</em> = 5806) that met the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the random-effects model indicated a moderate-to-large overall effect (<em>g</em> = .756) of educational robotics interventions on students’ learning outcomes. Specifically, educational robotics had a moderate-to-large impact on cognitive learning outcomes (<em>g</em> = .738) and a large effect on affective learning outcomes (<em>g</em> = .808). The moderator analysis revealed that control group condition was the only statistically significant moderator, indicating that the relative advantage of robotics is larger when compared to traditional instruction than to other technology. The non-significance of most moderators suggests the robust and versatile applicability of educational robotics across diverse educational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100790"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X26000291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Educational robotics has been extensively employed to support students' learning. Although the effect of educational robotics on students' learning has been widely examined, extant empirical studies have reported contradictory conclusions. A comprehensive meta-analytic study was conducted to examine the effects of educational robotics on students' learning outcomes across various educational levels and school subjects and explore potential application-related, interaction-related, research-related moderators of the effects. A total of 108 effect sizes from 58 studies (N = 5806) that met the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the random-effects model indicated a moderate-to-large overall effect (g = .756) of educational robotics interventions on students’ learning outcomes. Specifically, educational robotics had a moderate-to-large impact on cognitive learning outcomes (g = .738) and a large effect on affective learning outcomes (g = .808). The moderator analysis revealed that control group condition was the only statistically significant moderator, indicating that the relative advantage of robotics is larger when compared to traditional instruction than to other technology. The non-significance of most moderators suggests the robust and versatile applicability of educational robotics across diverse educational contexts.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.