The effects of educational robotics on students’ learning outcomes: A three-level meta-analysis

IF 10.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100790
Yanqun Lu , Shengnan Geng
{"title":"The effects of educational robotics on students’ learning outcomes: A three-level meta-analysis","authors":"Yanqun Lu ,&nbsp;Shengnan Geng","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational robotics has been extensively employed to support students' learning. Although the effect of educational robotics on students' learning has been widely examined, extant empirical studies have reported contradictory conclusions. A comprehensive meta-analytic study was conducted to examine the effects of educational robotics on students' learning outcomes across various educational levels and school subjects and explore potential application-related, interaction-related, research-related moderators of the effects. A total of 108 effect sizes from 58 studies (<em>N</em> = 5806) that met the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the random-effects model indicated a moderate-to-large overall effect (<em>g</em> = .756) of educational robotics interventions on students’ learning outcomes. Specifically, educational robotics had a moderate-to-large impact on cognitive learning outcomes (<em>g</em> = .738) and a large effect on affective learning outcomes (<em>g</em> = .808). The moderator analysis revealed that control group condition was the only statistically significant moderator, indicating that the relative advantage of robotics is larger when compared to traditional instruction than to other technology. The non-significance of most moderators suggests the robust and versatile applicability of educational robotics across diverse educational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100790"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X26000291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational robotics has been extensively employed to support students' learning. Although the effect of educational robotics on students' learning has been widely examined, extant empirical studies have reported contradictory conclusions. A comprehensive meta-analytic study was conducted to examine the effects of educational robotics on students' learning outcomes across various educational levels and school subjects and explore potential application-related, interaction-related, research-related moderators of the effects. A total of 108 effect sizes from 58 studies (N = 5806) that met the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the random-effects model indicated a moderate-to-large overall effect (g = .756) of educational robotics interventions on students’ learning outcomes. Specifically, educational robotics had a moderate-to-large impact on cognitive learning outcomes (g = .738) and a large effect on affective learning outcomes (g = .808). The moderator analysis revealed that control group condition was the only statistically significant moderator, indicating that the relative advantage of robotics is larger when compared to traditional instruction than to other technology. The non-significance of most moderators suggests the robust and versatile applicability of educational robotics across diverse educational contexts.
教育机器人对学生学习成果的影响:一个三层次的元分析
教育机器人已被广泛用于支持学生的学习。虽然教育机器人对学生学习的影响已经得到了广泛的研究,但现有的实证研究得出了相互矛盾的结论。通过一项综合的元分析研究,研究了教育机器人对不同教育水平和学校科目学生学习成果的影响,并探讨了潜在的应用相关、互动相关和研究相关的调节因素。符合入选标准的58项研究(N = 5806)共有108个效应量被纳入meta分析。随机效应模型的结果表明,教育机器人干预对学生的学习成果有中等到较大的总体效应(g = .756)。具体来说,教育机器人对认知学习结果有中等到较大的影响(g = .738),对情感学习结果有较大的影响(g = .808)。调节分析显示,控制组条件是唯一具有统计学意义的调节因素,表明与传统教学相比,机器人技术的相对优势更大。大多数调节因子的不显著性表明教育机器人在不同教育背景下的强大和通用适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书