A decade of reflection and thematic review on artificial intelligence's impact on educational measurement

IF 10.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100789
Jiawei Xiong , Feiming Li
{"title":"A decade of reflection and thematic review on artificial intelligence's impact on educational measurement","authors":"Jiawei Xiong ,&nbsp;Feiming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational measurement stands at a transformative juncture as artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes assessment practices, however, no comprehensive synthesis has examined this evolution systematically. This thematic review integrates five major international conference trends with peer-reviewed literature to map AI's decade-long impact on educational measurement and to derive heuristic insights for learning and instruction. Through systematic content analysis, we identify three distinct evolutionary eras, the Formative Era (2015-2018), the Expansion Era (2019-2022), and the ongoing Generative Era (2023-present). Our analysis traces AI's progression from an operational tool to a co-designer for assessment and learning, organized through an Efficiency–Enhancement–Transformation framework. Within this framework, we highlight four key themes: (a) AI on scoring and item generation, (b) AI on psychometric modeling, (c) AI on assessment innovation and process data, and (d) AI on fairness, ethics, and equity. Across these themes, the literature reveals both opportunities, such as scalability and richer diagnostic inference, and challenges, including interpretability, algorithmic bias, and construct validity. The evidence also points to a new paradigm that integrates measurement theory with AI methods. The review concludes future directions for the responsible adoption of AI in educational measurement and discusses how AI-integrated measurement can inform learning and instruction, with emphasis on transparency, equity, and the reconceptualization of educational constructs in the context of human–AI interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100789"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2600028X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational measurement stands at a transformative juncture as artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes assessment practices, however, no comprehensive synthesis has examined this evolution systematically. This thematic review integrates five major international conference trends with peer-reviewed literature to map AI's decade-long impact on educational measurement and to derive heuristic insights for learning and instruction. Through systematic content analysis, we identify three distinct evolutionary eras, the Formative Era (2015-2018), the Expansion Era (2019-2022), and the ongoing Generative Era (2023-present). Our analysis traces AI's progression from an operational tool to a co-designer for assessment and learning, organized through an Efficiency–Enhancement–Transformation framework. Within this framework, we highlight four key themes: (a) AI on scoring and item generation, (b) AI on psychometric modeling, (c) AI on assessment innovation and process data, and (d) AI on fairness, ethics, and equity. Across these themes, the literature reveals both opportunities, such as scalability and richer diagnostic inference, and challenges, including interpretability, algorithmic bias, and construct validity. The evidence also points to a new paradigm that integrates measurement theory with AI methods. The review concludes future directions for the responsible adoption of AI in educational measurement and discusses how AI-integrated measurement can inform learning and instruction, with emphasis on transparency, equity, and the reconceptualization of educational constructs in the context of human–AI interaction.
人工智能对教育测量影响的十年反思与专题回顾
随着人工智能(AI)重塑评估实践,教育测量正处于变革的关键时刻,然而,没有一个全面的综合系统地检查了这一演变。本专题综述将五大国际会议趋势与同行评议文献相结合,以绘制人工智能十年来对教育测量的影响,并为学习和教学提供启发式见解。通过系统的内容分析,我们确定了三个不同的进化时代,形成时代(2015-2018),扩张时代(2019-2022)和正在进行的生成时代(2023年至今)。我们的分析追踪了人工智能从一个操作工具到评估和学习的共同设计者的进展,通过效率-增强-转型框架进行组织。在这个框架内,我们强调了四个关键主题:(a)评分和项目生成方面的人工智能,(b)心理测量建模方面的人工智能,(c)评估创新和过程数据方面的人工智能,以及(d)公平、道德和平等方面的人工智能。在这些主题中,文献揭示了机遇,如可扩展性和更丰富的诊断推理,以及挑战,包括可解释性,算法偏差和结构有效性。证据还指向了一种将测量理论与人工智能方法相结合的新范式。这篇综述总结了在教育测量中负责任地采用人工智能的未来方向,并讨论了人工智能集成测量如何为学习和教学提供信息,重点是在人类与人工智能交互的背景下,透明度、公平性和教育结构的重新概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书