Assessing Risk for Bycatch and Byproduct Species Using a Modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) Approach

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Grant J. Johnson, Jonathan J. Smart, Vinay Udyawer, Rik C. Buckworth, Clive R. McMahon, Chalie Huveneers
{"title":"Assessing Risk for Bycatch and Byproduct Species Using a Modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) Approach","authors":"Grant J. Johnson, Jonathan J. Smart, Vinay Udyawer, Rik C. Buckworth, Clive R. McMahon, Chalie Huveneers","doi":"10.1111/faf.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central to ecosystem‐based fisheries management is ensuring the sustainability of bycatch and byproduct species. However, the sustainability of these species is difficult to assess as the lack of information limits the use of traditional stock assessment methods. We demonstrate, using a complex multi‐species fisheries exemplar, the efficient assessment of large numbers of diverse species, using a modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) approach. Applying this technique to 256 teleost and elasmobranch species caught in Australia's Northern Territory Demersal and Timor Reef Fisheries, we first applied an initial screening assessment to identify at‐risk species followed by a secondary SAFE assessment for a more detailed evaluation. To enhance the precision of the secondary assessment, we incorporated species distribution modelling and refined fishing footprint estimates through spatial analysis of trawl paths, from vessel monitoring system data. Additionally, we integrated Monte Carlo simulations into the SAFE process to quantify uncertainties in fishing footprint and capture efficiency parameters. The conservative criteria applied in the initial screening process assessed 208 species as low‐risk, with the remaining 48 species evaluated through our modified secondary SAFE approach. These 48 species were also subsequently classified as low‐risk. Our approach adds steps to the SAFE process but enables us to efficiently assess large numbers of diverse species and thereby allows resources to be allocated to those species most at‐risk. This adaptable approach is readily modifiable for application in other fisheries, including those with no or limited effort and catch data.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central to ecosystem‐based fisheries management is ensuring the sustainability of bycatch and byproduct species. However, the sustainability of these species is difficult to assess as the lack of information limits the use of traditional stock assessment methods. We demonstrate, using a complex multi‐species fisheries exemplar, the efficient assessment of large numbers of diverse species, using a modified Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE) approach. Applying this technique to 256 teleost and elasmobranch species caught in Australia's Northern Territory Demersal and Timor Reef Fisheries, we first applied an initial screening assessment to identify at‐risk species followed by a secondary SAFE assessment for a more detailed evaluation. To enhance the precision of the secondary assessment, we incorporated species distribution modelling and refined fishing footprint estimates through spatial analysis of trawl paths, from vessel monitoring system data. Additionally, we integrated Monte Carlo simulations into the SAFE process to quantify uncertainties in fishing footprint and capture efficiency parameters. The conservative criteria applied in the initial screening process assessed 208 species as low‐risk, with the remaining 48 species evaluated through our modified secondary SAFE approach. These 48 species were also subsequently classified as low‐risk. Our approach adds steps to the SAFE process but enables us to efficiently assess large numbers of diverse species and thereby allows resources to be allocated to those species most at‐risk. This adaptable approach is readily modifiable for application in other fisheries, including those with no or limited effort and catch data.
利用改进的捕捞效果可持续性评估方法评估副渔获物和副产物物种的风险
基于生态系统的渔业管理的核心是确保副渔获物和副产物物种的可持续性。然而,这些物种的可持续性很难评估,因为缺乏信息限制了传统种群评估方法的使用。我们利用一个复杂的多物种渔业范例,展示了使用改进的捕捞效应可持续性评估(SAFE)方法对大量不同物种的有效评估。将该技术应用于澳大利亚北领地底底和帝汶礁渔业捕捞的256种硬骨鱼和板鳃鱼,我们首先应用了初步筛选评估来确定处于危险中的物种,然后进行了二次SAFE评估以进行更详细的评估。为了提高二次评估的精度,我们结合了物种分布模型,并通过对拖网路径的空间分析来改进捕捞足迹估算,这些数据来自船舶监测系统数据。此外,我们将蒙特卡罗模拟集成到SAFE过程中,以量化捕捞足迹和捕获效率参数的不确定性。在初始筛选过程中采用的保守标准评估了208种低风险物种,其余48种通过我们改进的二级SAFE方法进行了评估。这48种物种随后也被列为低风险物种。我们的方法增加了SAFE过程的步骤,但使我们能够有效地评估大量不同的物种,从而允许将资源分配给那些风险最大的物种。这种适应性强的方法很容易加以修改,以适用于其他渔场,包括那些没有或只有有限努力和捕捞数据的渔场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书