Behaviors that come out of a copepod's mind

IF 3.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
Jarl Giske, Tom J. Langbehn, Pawel Burkhardt, Johanna M. Aarflot
{"title":"Behaviors that come out of a copepod's mind","authors":"Jarl Giske, Tom J. Langbehn, Pawel Burkhardt, Johanna M. Aarflot","doi":"10.1002/lno.70380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many aquatic environments are changing much faster than the gene pools of animals inhabiting them. To better predict how a copepod will behave, it is helpful to try to fathom the world from its sensory and cognitive system. Studies of genes, hormones, neuropeptides, and neural circuits can reveal underlying mechanisms while behavioral studies may capture their integrated outcomes. From the literature, which is richest for the calanoids <jats:italic>Acartia</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Calanus</jats:italic> and the harpacticoid <jats:italic>Tigriopus</jats:italic> , we find that copepod decision‐making is centralized in the central nervous system. Copepod decision‐making and behavior can be described and modeled as (i) a dialogue between competing survival circuits that link sensing and behavior via (ii) subjective internal models and (iii) an ontogeny‐ and state‐dependent value system, the latter modulated by clock genes and hormones. Thereafter, (iv) competing neurobiological states can lead to (v) a global organismic state with (vi) narrowed attention. Then, (vii) the copepod's predictive models of near‐future expectations, based on (viii) its memory and (ix) learning from (x) previous prediction errors, will find the expectedly most attractive decision. From this follows our definition of the copepod mind as the integrated cognitive mechanisms underlying decision‐making: (i) awareness of itself, of some past experiences, and of its surroundings; (ii) capacity for competing emotions; and (iii) expectations to the effects of its actions. Copepod behavior and development can be understood and modeled from the decisions that come out of such minds.","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many aquatic environments are changing much faster than the gene pools of animals inhabiting them. To better predict how a copepod will behave, it is helpful to try to fathom the world from its sensory and cognitive system. Studies of genes, hormones, neuropeptides, and neural circuits can reveal underlying mechanisms while behavioral studies may capture their integrated outcomes. From the literature, which is richest for the calanoids Acartia and Calanus and the harpacticoid Tigriopus , we find that copepod decision‐making is centralized in the central nervous system. Copepod decision‐making and behavior can be described and modeled as (i) a dialogue between competing survival circuits that link sensing and behavior via (ii) subjective internal models and (iii) an ontogeny‐ and state‐dependent value system, the latter modulated by clock genes and hormones. Thereafter, (iv) competing neurobiological states can lead to (v) a global organismic state with (vi) narrowed attention. Then, (vii) the copepod's predictive models of near‐future expectations, based on (viii) its memory and (ix) learning from (x) previous prediction errors, will find the expectedly most attractive decision. From this follows our definition of the copepod mind as the integrated cognitive mechanisms underlying decision‐making: (i) awareness of itself, of some past experiences, and of its surroundings; (ii) capacity for competing emotions; and (iii) expectations to the effects of its actions. Copepod behavior and development can be understood and modeled from the decisions that come out of such minds.
这是桡足动物的思维行为
许多水生环境的变化比栖息在其中的动物基因库的变化要快得多。为了更好地预测桡足动物的行为,尝试从它的感觉和认知系统来理解世界是有帮助的。基因、激素、神经肽和神经回路的研究可以揭示潜在的机制,而行为研究可以捕获它们的综合结果。从文献中,我们发现桡足类动物的决策集中在中枢神经系统中,其中最丰富的是角足类动物Acartia和Calanus以及角足类动物Tigriopus。桡足动物的决策和行为可以被描述和建模为:(i)竞争生存回路之间的对话,通过(ii)主观内部模型连接感知和行为;(iii)个体发育和状态依赖的价值系统,后者由时钟基因和激素调节。此后,(iv)相互竞争的神经生物学状态可能导致(v)具有(vi)注意力狭窄的全球有机体状态。然后,(vii)桡足动物对近期预期的预测模型,基于(viii)其记忆和(ix)从(x)先前预测错误中学习,将找到预期中最具吸引力的决策。据此,我们将桡足动物的心智定义为决策背后的综合认知机制:(1)对自身、过去经历和周围环境的意识;(ii)竞争情绪的能力;(三)对其行动效果的预期。桡足动物的行为和发展可以从这些头脑中做出的决定中得到理解和建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书