Mucilage addition increases aggregate stability and tolerance of microbes to soil drying

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Charles R. Warren, Sheikh M. F. Rabbi, Iain M. Young
{"title":"Mucilage addition increases aggregate stability and tolerance of microbes to soil drying","authors":"Charles R. Warren, Sheikh M. F. Rabbi, Iain M. Young","doi":"10.1007/s11104-026-08585-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Polysaccharide-rich mucilage from plant roots alters soil structure and microbial microhabitats, potentially modifying microbial responses to drying and rewetting. Here we tested the hypotheses that mucilage strengthens soil aggregates, increases microbial survival during dry–rewet cycles, and alters respiration responses to drying and rewetting. Methods To distinguish effects arising from the physical and biophysical properties of mucilage from those due to added carbon, we compared soil amended with 0.1 mg g <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> mucilage with soil receiving the same amount of carbon as glucose. Half of the soils were kept well-watered, while half were dried slowly over 24 days, rewet and monitored for a further 20 days. We adopted an integrative approach linking physical properties (aggregate stability) with microbial responses (PLFA) to mechanistically scale from microbial microhabitats to survival and respiration. Results Mucilage degraded quickly; nevertheless, at minimum water content the extracellular polysaccharide content of mucilage-amended soil was more than twice as large as soils receiving glucose. Wet sieving indicated mucilage amendment and dry-rewet cycle increased aggregate stability. Respiration averaged 12% faster in mucilage-amended than glucose-amended soil. At minimum water content in the dry–rewet treatment, the PLFA pool was 50% larger in mucilage-amended soil, indicating increased microbial survival under water deficit. Conclusion We conclude that mucilage, for example from plant roots, has complex effects on soil that extend beyond that of a physical binding agent and also include significant effects on microbial survivorship and activity across dry-rewet cycles.","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-08585-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims Polysaccharide-rich mucilage from plant roots alters soil structure and microbial microhabitats, potentially modifying microbial responses to drying and rewetting. Here we tested the hypotheses that mucilage strengthens soil aggregates, increases microbial survival during dry–rewet cycles, and alters respiration responses to drying and rewetting. Methods To distinguish effects arising from the physical and biophysical properties of mucilage from those due to added carbon, we compared soil amended with 0.1 mg g −1 mucilage with soil receiving the same amount of carbon as glucose. Half of the soils were kept well-watered, while half were dried slowly over 24 days, rewet and monitored for a further 20 days. We adopted an integrative approach linking physical properties (aggregate stability) with microbial responses (PLFA) to mechanistically scale from microbial microhabitats to survival and respiration. Results Mucilage degraded quickly; nevertheless, at minimum water content the extracellular polysaccharide content of mucilage-amended soil was more than twice as large as soils receiving glucose. Wet sieving indicated mucilage amendment and dry-rewet cycle increased aggregate stability. Respiration averaged 12% faster in mucilage-amended than glucose-amended soil. At minimum water content in the dry–rewet treatment, the PLFA pool was 50% larger in mucilage-amended soil, indicating increased microbial survival under water deficit. Conclusion We conclude that mucilage, for example from plant roots, has complex effects on soil that extend beyond that of a physical binding agent and also include significant effects on microbial survivorship and activity across dry-rewet cycles.
黏液的添加增加了团聚体的稳定性和微生物对土壤干燥的耐受性
来自植物根系的富含多糖的粘液改变了土壤结构和微生物的微栖息地,潜在地改变了微生物对干燥和再湿润的反应。在这里,我们测试了这样的假设:粘液增强了土壤团聚体,增加了干湿循环中的微生物存活率,并改变了干燥和再湿时的呼吸反应。方法为了区分黏液的物理和生物物理性质对土壤的影响,以及添加碳对土壤的影响,我们将添加0.1 mg g−1黏液的土壤与添加与葡萄糖等量碳的土壤进行了比较。一半的土壤保持充足的水分,而一半的土壤在24天内慢慢干燥,再湿润并监测20天。我们采用了一种综合方法,将物理特性(聚集稳定性)与微生物反应(PLFA)联系起来,从微生物微栖息地到生存和呼吸的机械尺度。结果粘液降解快;然而,在最低含水量下,黏液修正土壤的胞外多糖含量是接受葡萄糖的土壤的两倍多。湿法筛分表明胶浆改性和干-复湿循环增加了骨料的稳定性。黏液修正土壤的呼吸作用比葡萄糖修正土壤平均快12%。在干湿复湿处理中,在含水量最低的情况下,经过黏液处理的土壤中,PLFA池增加了50%,表明水分不足下微生物存活率增加。我们得出的结论是,粘液,例如来自植物根系的粘液,对土壤具有复杂的影响,超出了物理粘合剂的作用,还包括对干湿循环中微生物存活和活性的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书