Managing parallel business models in the circular transition: From tension recognition to synergy realization

IF 10.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Farshad Hajiakbari, Alex A. Alblas, Néomie Raassens, Marcel L. A. M. Bogers
{"title":"Managing parallel business models in the circular transition: From tension recognition to synergy realization","authors":"Farshad Hajiakbari, Alex A. Alblas, Néomie Raassens, Marcel L. A. M. Bogers","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations are increasingly urged to adopt circular economy principles for their business strategies, yet ‘going circular’ is challenging. The circular business model (CBM) transition—shifting from linear to CBMs—is complex, and our initial analysis of the literature indicated that organizations do not know how to implement circular principles alongside existing business models. In practice, the parallel management of two business models creates tensions between exploring new circular initiatives and exploiting established linear practices. By systematically reviewing research on organizational learning and business model innovation, this review proposes a theoretical model that frames the CBM transition as a dynamic, iterative and experiential process, turning tensions into synergies through continuous learning and adaptation. Our review reveals learning‐based strategies for organizations to address these inherent tensions at multiple levels, including employees’ cognitions, organizational operations and network legitimization. Furthermore, we set a future research agenda for the CBM transition.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly urged to adopt circular economy principles for their business strategies, yet ‘going circular’ is challenging. The circular business model (CBM) transition—shifting from linear to CBMs—is complex, and our initial analysis of the literature indicated that organizations do not know how to implement circular principles alongside existing business models. In practice, the parallel management of two business models creates tensions between exploring new circular initiatives and exploiting established linear practices. By systematically reviewing research on organizational learning and business model innovation, this review proposes a theoretical model that frames the CBM transition as a dynamic, iterative and experiential process, turning tensions into synergies through continuous learning and adaptation. Our review reveals learning‐based strategies for organizations to address these inherent tensions at multiple levels, including employees’ cognitions, organizational operations and network legitimization. Furthermore, we set a future research agenda for the CBM transition.
循环转型中的并行业务模式管理:从紧张认识到协同实现
越来越多的组织被敦促采用循环经济原则作为他们的商业战略,然而“循环”是具有挑战性的。循环商业模式(CBM)从线性到CBM的转变是复杂的,我们对文献的初步分析表明,组织不知道如何在现有商业模式的基础上实施循环原则。在实践中,两种商业模式的并行管理在探索新的循环计划和利用已建立的线性实践之间造成了紧张关系。通过对组织学习和商业模式创新的研究进行系统回顾,本文提出了一个理论模型,该模型将CBM转变为一个动态的、迭代的和经验的过程,通过不断的学习和适应将紧张转化为协同效应。我们的回顾揭示了组织在多个层面上解决这些内在紧张关系的基于学习的策略,包括员工认知、组织运作和网络合法化。此外,我们还为CBM转型制定了未来的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书