Cogeneration: Energy Efficiency of Competing Technologies

IF 1 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
S. P. Filippov, M. D. Dilman
{"title":"Cogeneration: Energy Efficiency of Competing Technologies","authors":"S. P. Filippov,&nbsp;M. D. Dilman","doi":"10.1134/S0040601525700867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article proposes a methodology for carrying out a comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of combined (cogeneration) and separate arrangements for electricity and heat generation, which takes into account the operating characteristics of different cogeneration unit classes [steam turbine units (STU), gas turbine units (GTU), and combined cycle units (CCU)], as well as the regional climatic conditions of their operation. By using the developed calculation tool, it is possible to determine key indicators such as relative annual fuel saving, coefficient of fuel utilization (CFU), and capacity factor (CF). The study was carried out for a wide range of the capacities of gas units (10–230 MW) and for a coal fired STU (100 MW) with taking into account the characteristics of regional power systems at the places of possible use of cogeneration units. It is shown that cogeneration is an efficient method for saving fuel and reducing greenhouse gas emissions under the currently existing conditions, and with the expected improvement in the efficiency of separate electricity and heat generation. Currently, the use of GTUs and STUs for cogeneration purposes can save 19–37% of fuel, and that of CCUs, up to 28–44% depending on the regional and climatic conditions. Even if we take a hypothetical case of achieving average annual efficiency equal to 55% in the separate arrangement of electricity and heat generation at fossil fueled power plants, the fuel saving due to cogeneration still remains positive, although it will decrease to make from 1 to 11% in the case of using steam turbine and gas turbine units, and 6–19% in the case of using combined cycle units. It has been determined that the best prospects for use will be for cogeneration units featuring high electricity generation efficiency, also during operation at partial loads, and also with a wide thermal power adjustment range. The obtained conclusions and developed techniques can be used for substantiating the choice of technologies in designing and modernizing combined heat and power plants, and in elaborating programs for development of thermal power facilities in regions with different climatic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"73 3","pages":"210 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601525700867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article proposes a methodology for carrying out a comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of combined (cogeneration) and separate arrangements for electricity and heat generation, which takes into account the operating characteristics of different cogeneration unit classes [steam turbine units (STU), gas turbine units (GTU), and combined cycle units (CCU)], as well as the regional climatic conditions of their operation. By using the developed calculation tool, it is possible to determine key indicators such as relative annual fuel saving, coefficient of fuel utilization (CFU), and capacity factor (CF). The study was carried out for a wide range of the capacities of gas units (10–230 MW) and for a coal fired STU (100 MW) with taking into account the characteristics of regional power systems at the places of possible use of cogeneration units. It is shown that cogeneration is an efficient method for saving fuel and reducing greenhouse gas emissions under the currently existing conditions, and with the expected improvement in the efficiency of separate electricity and heat generation. Currently, the use of GTUs and STUs for cogeneration purposes can save 19–37% of fuel, and that of CCUs, up to 28–44% depending on the regional and climatic conditions. Even if we take a hypothetical case of achieving average annual efficiency equal to 55% in the separate arrangement of electricity and heat generation at fossil fueled power plants, the fuel saving due to cogeneration still remains positive, although it will decrease to make from 1 to 11% in the case of using steam turbine and gas turbine units, and 6–19% in the case of using combined cycle units. It has been determined that the best prospects for use will be for cogeneration units featuring high electricity generation efficiency, also during operation at partial loads, and also with a wide thermal power adjustment range. The obtained conclusions and developed techniques can be used for substantiating the choice of technologies in designing and modernizing combined heat and power plants, and in elaborating programs for development of thermal power facilities in regions with different climatic conditions.

Abstract Image

热电联产:竞争技术的能源效率
本文提出了一种方法,用于对联产(热电联产)和单独安排发电和供热的能源效率进行比较分析,该方法考虑到不同热电联产机组类别[蒸汽轮机机组(STU),燃气轮机机组(GTU)和联合循环机组(CCU)]的运行特性,以及它们运行的区域气候条件。利用开发的计算工具,可以确定相对年节油量、燃料利用系数(CFU)和容量系数(CF)等关键指标。在考虑到可能使用热电联产装置的地方的区域电力系统的特点的情况下,对各种容量的燃气装置(10-230兆瓦)和燃煤STU(100兆瓦)进行了研究。结果表明,在现有条件下,热电联产是一种节约燃料和减少温室气体排放的有效方法,并且有望提高电热分离发电的效率。目前,使用gtu和STUs用于热电联产可节省19-37%的燃料,而使用ccu可节省28-44%,具体取决于区域和气候条件。即使我们假设在化石燃料发电厂的电力和热力分开安排的情况下,平均年效率达到55%,由于热电联产的燃料节约仍然是正的,尽管在使用蒸汽轮机和燃气轮机机组的情况下,它将从1%下降到11%,在使用联合循环机组的情况下,它将下降到6-19%。已经确定,最佳的使用前景将是具有高发电效率的热电联产机组,也在部分负荷运行期间,并且具有广泛的热功率调节范围。所得结论和开发的技术可为热电联产电厂的设计和现代化技术选择提供依据,也可为不同气候条件地区火电设施的发展规划提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书