Constituent-constrained word prediction during language comprehension

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jiajie Zou  (, ), David Poeppel, Nai Ding  (, )
{"title":"Constituent-constrained word prediction during language comprehension","authors":"Jiajie Zou \n (, ), David Poeppel, Nai Ding \n (, )","doi":"10.1038/s41593-026-02272-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Next-word prediction has been hypothesized as the central computational objective of the human language system, akin to that of current large language models. Here we put this conjecture to the test, investigating whether the brain predicts each upcoming word as precisely as possible when listening to connected speech. In three magnetoencephalography experiments with Mandarin Chinese speakers, we demonstrate that the response related to word unpredictability, that is, word surprisal calculated using large language models, is significantly stronger for words within an ongoing constituent than words across a major constituent boundary, and this effect is further modulated by the certainty of a constituent boundary. This constituent-boundary effect is also observed behaviorally unless speech is very slowly presented, and it is confirmed by analyzing a dataset of electrocorticography responses to natural English narratives. The constituent-boundary effect demonstrates that the language system does not solely optimize word-prediction precision; rather, it balances word-prediction contributions by constituent-constrained management of linguistic contextual representations. Zou et al. reveal a key difference between human brains and large language models (LLMs). While LLMs are optimized to predict the next word, the human brain modulates prediction efficiency by strategically grouping words into phrases.","PeriodicalId":19076,"journal":{"name":"Nature neuroscience","volume":"29 6","pages":"1498-1509"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02272-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Next-word prediction has been hypothesized as the central computational objective of the human language system, akin to that of current large language models. Here we put this conjecture to the test, investigating whether the brain predicts each upcoming word as precisely as possible when listening to connected speech. In three magnetoencephalography experiments with Mandarin Chinese speakers, we demonstrate that the response related to word unpredictability, that is, word surprisal calculated using large language models, is significantly stronger for words within an ongoing constituent than words across a major constituent boundary, and this effect is further modulated by the certainty of a constituent boundary. This constituent-boundary effect is also observed behaviorally unless speech is very slowly presented, and it is confirmed by analyzing a dataset of electrocorticography responses to natural English narratives. The constituent-boundary effect demonstrates that the language system does not solely optimize word-prediction precision; rather, it balances word-prediction contributions by constituent-constrained management of linguistic contextual representations. Zou et al. reveal a key difference between human brains and large language models (LLMs). While LLMs are optimized to predict the next word, the human brain modulates prediction efficiency by strategically grouping words into phrases.

Abstract Image

语言理解中的成分约束词预测。
下一个单词的预测被假设为人类语言系统的核心计算目标,类似于当前的大型语言模型。在这里,我们对这一猜想进行了测试,研究大脑在听连接语音时是否会尽可能准确地预测每个即将到来的单词。在对普通话使用者进行的三个脑磁图实验中,我们证明了与单词不可预测性相关的反应,即使用大型语言模型计算的单词惊喜,对于正在进行的组成部分内的单词比跨越主要组成部分边界的单词明显更强,并且这种效应被组成部分边界的确定性进一步调节。这种成分边界效应也可以在行为上观察到,除非言语呈现得非常缓慢,并且通过分析对自然英语叙述的皮质电图反应数据集得到证实。成分边界效应表明,语言系统并不仅仅优化词预测精度;相反,它通过语言上下文表示的成分约束管理来平衡单词预测的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature neuroscience
Nature neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
38.60
自引率
1.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Neuroscience, a multidisciplinary journal, publishes papers of the utmost quality and significance across all realms of neuroscience. The editors welcome contributions spanning molecular, cellular, systems, and cognitive neuroscience, along with psychophysics, computational modeling, and nervous system disorders. While no area is off-limits, studies offering fundamental insights into nervous system function receive priority. The journal offers high visibility to both readers and authors, fostering interdisciplinary communication and accessibility to a broad audience. It maintains high standards of copy editing and production, rigorous peer review, rapid publication, and operates independently from academic societies and other vested interests. In addition to primary research, Nature Neuroscience features news and views, reviews, editorials, commentaries, perspectives, book reviews, and correspondence, aiming to serve as the voice of the global neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书