Optimizing the design and production of custom 3D-printed knee orthoses.

IF 3.1 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jakub Szary, Małgorzata Kowalczyk, Mateusz Zwierzycki, Piotr Knysak, Anna Nowak, Katarzyna Janczak, Cyprian Kornacki, Marcin Domżalski
{"title":"Optimizing the design and production of custom 3D-printed knee orthoses.","authors":"Jakub Szary, Małgorzata Kowalczyk, Mateusz Zwierzycki, Piotr Knysak, Anna Nowak, Katarzyna Janczak, Cyprian Kornacki, Marcin Domżalski","doi":"10.1186/s41205-026-00323-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Traditional methods for producing custom-made orthoses are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and reliant on manual processes, which limit both scalability and the degree of individualization. The development of 3D scanning technologies, computer-aided design (CAD), and additive manufacturing offers a promising alternative enabling patient-specific solutions with greater precision, speed, and efficiency. This study aimed to create an algorithm for automating the design process of personalized knee orthoses based on 3D scanning and intended for 3D printing production. METHODS: A parametric modeling workflow was developed in the Rhino environment using the Grasshopper plug-in to streamline personalized knee orthoses creation. The process began with acquiring high-quality 3D scans using Structure Sensor Mark II scanner mounted on an iPad with 3DsizeMe software. The parametric algorithm was transformed into an autonomous Rhino plug-in using C# language and RhinoCommon API. As part of Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF), three participants with knee joint disorders used orthoses for one month. Assessment used a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Personalized orthoses were manufactured using powder-bed fusion technology with PA11 CF nylon powder reinforced with carbon fibers. RESULTS: Design time was reduced from approximately 8 h to 10,3 ± 1,4 min. In Grasshopper prototype phase, average design time was 26,7 ± 4,5 min. Following the implementation of the Rhino plug-in, the design time was further reduced to approximately 10 min. The tool was shown to meet user requirements and fulfill its intended purpose. All three PMCF participants rated orthoses positively, reporting high comfort, effective stabilization, increased physical activity, and overall satisfaction with functionality and appearance. Participants P1 and P2 noted a large increase in physical activity, with P1 indicating pain reduction that increased mobility. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the combined use of Rhino and Grasshopper provides an effective platform for parametric design of personalized knee orthoses based on patient-specific 3D scans. The workflow reduced design time to approximately 10,3 ± 1,4 min, highlighting potential for routine clinical applications. This reduction is economically significant, lowering labor costs and implementation thresholds for personalized orthotic solutions in clinical practice. </p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-026-00323-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods for producing custom-made orthoses are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and reliant on manual processes, which limit both scalability and the degree of individualization. The development of 3D scanning technologies, computer-aided design (CAD), and additive manufacturing offers a promising alternative enabling patient-specific solutions with greater precision, speed, and efficiency. This study aimed to create an algorithm for automating the design process of personalized knee orthoses based on 3D scanning and intended for 3D printing production. METHODS: A parametric modeling workflow was developed in the Rhino environment using the Grasshopper plug-in to streamline personalized knee orthoses creation. The process began with acquiring high-quality 3D scans using Structure Sensor Mark II scanner mounted on an iPad with 3DsizeMe software. The parametric algorithm was transformed into an autonomous Rhino plug-in using C# language and RhinoCommon API. As part of Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF), three participants with knee joint disorders used orthoses for one month. Assessment used a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Personalized orthoses were manufactured using powder-bed fusion technology with PA11 CF nylon powder reinforced with carbon fibers. RESULTS: Design time was reduced from approximately 8 h to 10,3 ± 1,4 min. In Grasshopper prototype phase, average design time was 26,7 ± 4,5 min. Following the implementation of the Rhino plug-in, the design time was further reduced to approximately 10 min. The tool was shown to meet user requirements and fulfill its intended purpose. All three PMCF participants rated orthoses positively, reporting high comfort, effective stabilization, increased physical activity, and overall satisfaction with functionality and appearance. Participants P1 and P2 noted a large increase in physical activity, with P1 indicating pain reduction that increased mobility. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the combined use of Rhino and Grasshopper provides an effective platform for parametric design of personalized knee orthoses based on patient-specific 3D scans. The workflow reduced design time to approximately 10,3 ± 1,4 min, highlighting potential for routine clinical applications. This reduction is economically significant, lowering labor costs and implementation thresholds for personalized orthotic solutions in clinical practice.

优化定制3d打印膝关节矫形器的设计和生产。
背景:生产定制矫形器的传统方法通常是耗时、劳动密集型的,并且依赖于手工过程,这限制了可扩展性和个性化程度。3D扫描技术、计算机辅助设计(CAD)和增材制造的发展为实现更高精度、速度和效率的特定患者解决方案提供了一个有前途的替代方案。本研究旨在创建一种基于3D扫描并用于3D打印生产的个性化膝关节矫形器的自动化设计过程的算法。方法:在Rhino环境中使用Grasshopper插件开发参数化建模工作流,以简化个性化膝关节矫形器的创建。这个过程开始于使用安装在iPad上的结构传感器Mark II扫描仪获得高质量的3D扫描,并安装了3DsizeMe软件。使用c#语言和RhinoCommon API将参数化算法转换成一个独立的Rhino插件。作为上市后临床随访(PMCF)的一部分,三名患有膝关节疾病的参与者使用矫形器一个月。评估采用5分制(1 =差,5 =优)。采用粉末床融合技术,用碳纤维增强的PA11 CF尼龙粉末制作个性化矫形器。结果:设计时间由约8 h缩短至10.3±1.4 min。在Grasshopper原型阶段,平均设计时间为26.7±4.5 min。在实现Rhino插件之后,设计时间进一步减少到大约10分钟。该工具已被证明能够满足用户需求并实现其预期目的。所有三名PMCF参与者对矫形器的评价都是积极的,他们报告了高舒适度、有效的稳定性、增加的身体活动以及对功能和外观的总体满意度。参与者P1和P2注意到身体活动大幅增加,P1表明疼痛减轻,活动能力增加。结论:本研究表明,Rhino和Grasshopper的联合使用为基于患者特定3D扫描的个性化膝关节矫形器参数化设计提供了有效的平台。该工作流程将设计时间缩短至约10.3±1.4分钟,突出了常规临床应用的潜力。这种减少在经济上意义重大,降低了临床实践中个性化矫形解决方案的人工成本和实施门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书