Real-World Utilization Patterns of Toxoplasmosis Diagnostic Testing in Korea: A Large-Scale Laboratory-Based Study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Rihwa Choi, Sang Gon Lee
{"title":"Real-World Utilization Patterns of Toxoplasmosis Diagnostic Testing in Korea: A Large-Scale Laboratory-Based Study.","authors":"Rihwa Choi, Sang Gon Lee","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Toxoplasmosis is primarily diagnosed using serologic assays, while PCR is applied selectively in specific clinical contexts. However, data on real-world utilization patterns of toxoplasmosis diagnostic tests remain limited, particularly in settings where the disease is relatively uncommon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed laboratory data for Toxoplasma gondii PCR, IgG, and IgM assays performed for clinical purposes between January 2020 and December 2024 at a large referral laboratory in Korea. Test utilization patterns, test combinations, test results measured after the initial test, and factors associated with test positivity were evaluated using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28,668 subjects underwent at least one toxoplasmosis-related test. Serologic testing accounted for the majority of initial evaluations, whereas PCR was used infrequently and primarily as a context-dependent adjunct. IgM positivity tended to be associated with subsequent testing after the initial test, while IgG positivity was more commonly observed with increasing age. Tests performed after the initial test were variably performed. PCR positivity suggestive of acute infection was rare and was observed only in cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous fluid specimens. Overall, testing patterns varied across institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large-scale study provides an overview of real-world toxoplasmosis diagnostic test utilization in Korea. Considerable variation was observed in test utilization patterns, including IgM use and testing performed after the initial test. Further studies incorporating clinical information are needed to clarify the clinical context and implications of these patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"e70231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Toxoplasmosis is primarily diagnosed using serologic assays, while PCR is applied selectively in specific clinical contexts. However, data on real-world utilization patterns of toxoplasmosis diagnostic tests remain limited, particularly in settings where the disease is relatively uncommon.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed laboratory data for Toxoplasma gondii PCR, IgG, and IgM assays performed for clinical purposes between January 2020 and December 2024 at a large referral laboratory in Korea. Test utilization patterns, test combinations, test results measured after the initial test, and factors associated with test positivity were evaluated using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results: A total of 28,668 subjects underwent at least one toxoplasmosis-related test. Serologic testing accounted for the majority of initial evaluations, whereas PCR was used infrequently and primarily as a context-dependent adjunct. IgM positivity tended to be associated with subsequent testing after the initial test, while IgG positivity was more commonly observed with increasing age. Tests performed after the initial test were variably performed. PCR positivity suggestive of acute infection was rare and was observed only in cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous fluid specimens. Overall, testing patterns varied across institutions.

Conclusions: This large-scale study provides an overview of real-world toxoplasmosis diagnostic test utilization in Korea. Considerable variation was observed in test utilization patterns, including IgM use and testing performed after the initial test. Further studies incorporating clinical information are needed to clarify the clinical context and implications of these patterns.

韩国弓形虫病诊断检测的现实世界利用模式:一项基于实验室的大规模研究。
背景:弓形虫病主要是通过血清学检测来诊断的,而PCR在特定的临床环境中有选择性地应用。然而,关于弓形虫病诊断检测的实际使用模式的数据仍然有限,特别是在疾病相对不常见的环境中。方法:我们回顾性分析了2020年1月至2024年12月在韩国一家大型转诊实验室进行的用于临床目的的弓形虫PCR、IgG和IgM检测的实验室数据。使用描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归分析对试验利用模式、试验组合、初始试验后测量的试验结果以及与试验阳性相关的因素进行评估。结果:共有28,668名受试者接受了至少一次弓形虫病相关检测。血清学检测占了初始评估的大部分,而聚合酶链反应很少被使用,主要作为一种依赖于环境的辅助手段。IgM阳性倾向于与初次检测后的后续检测相关,而IgG阳性则更常见于年龄的增长。初始测试后执行的测试以不同的方式执行。提示急性感染的PCR阳性罕见,仅在脑脊液和玻璃体液标本中观察到。总的来说,各个机构的测试模式各不相同。结论:这项大规模的研究提供了真实世界的弓形虫病诊断测试在韩国的使用概况。在测试利用模式中观察到相当大的变化,包括IgM的使用和在初始测试之后执行的测试。需要结合临床信息的进一步研究来澄清这些模式的临床背景和含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书