No antithrombotic therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority NAPT-LAAC trial.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Toshiaki Otsuka, Masanori Yamamoto, Masahiko Asami, Toru Naganuma, Yohei Ohno, Tomoyuki Tani, Gaku Nakazawa, Masaki Izumo, Mike Saji, Daisuke Hachinohe, Hiroshi Ueno, Atsushi Sugiura, Tetsuro Shimura, Shinya Okazaki, Takao Morikawa, Yuki Izumi, Masaki Nakashima, Shunsuke Kubo, Shinichi Shirai, Yusuke Watanabe, Kentaro Hayashida, On Behalf Of The Ocean-Laac Investigators
{"title":"No antithrombotic therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority NAPT-LAAC trial.","authors":"Toshiaki Otsuka, Masanori Yamamoto, Masahiko Asami, Toru Naganuma, Yohei Ohno, Tomoyuki Tani, Gaku Nakazawa, Masaki Izumo, Mike Saji, Daisuke Hachinohe, Hiroshi Ueno, Atsushi Sugiura, Tetsuro Shimura, Shinya Okazaki, Takao Morikawa, Yuki Izumi, Masaki Nakashima, Shunsuke Kubo, Shinichi Shirai, Yusuke Watanabe, Kentaro Hayashida, On Behalf Of The Ocean-Laac Investigators","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current standard regimen for antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) recommends long-term use of antiplatelet agents. However, this recommendation is not supported by sufficient clinical evidence. Since LAAC is a treatment option for managing patients at high risk of bleeding, it is necessary to clarify whether long-term antiplatelet therapy is truly required after LAAC. The Non-Antithrombotic Versus. Single antiPlatelet Therapy Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure (NAPT-LAAC) trial, a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint multicentre study, will be conducted in Japan. It was designed to evaluate whether non-antithrombotic therapy is non-inferior to antiplatelet monotherapy after 45 days of oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy following LAAC, with respect to the incidence of thrombotic and bleeding composite events in patients with NVAF and high bleeding risk. Patients with NVAF with a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA score ≥2 and who successfully undergo LAAC are eligible for inclusion. A total of 500 patients undergoing LAAC will be randomised (1:1) to aspirin monotherapy versus non-antithrombotic therapy for the 45 days following OAC monotherapy. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-fatal bleeding during a maximum of 4 years of follow-up. Major bleeding or clinically relevant non-fatal bleeding is defined as Type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. The NAPT-LAAC trial will determine the probable non-inferiority of long-term non-antithrombotic therapy to aspirin monotherapy in patients with NVAF who undergo LAAC. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07125417; jRCTs031250110).</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"22 8","pages":"e455-e462"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01307","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current standard regimen for antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) recommends long-term use of antiplatelet agents. However, this recommendation is not supported by sufficient clinical evidence. Since LAAC is a treatment option for managing patients at high risk of bleeding, it is necessary to clarify whether long-term antiplatelet therapy is truly required after LAAC. The Non-Antithrombotic Versus. Single antiPlatelet Therapy Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure (NAPT-LAAC) trial, a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint multicentre study, will be conducted in Japan. It was designed to evaluate whether non-antithrombotic therapy is non-inferior to antiplatelet monotherapy after 45 days of oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy following LAAC, with respect to the incidence of thrombotic and bleeding composite events in patients with NVAF and high bleeding risk. Patients with NVAF with a CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2 and who successfully undergo LAAC are eligible for inclusion. A total of 500 patients undergoing LAAC will be randomised (1:1) to aspirin monotherapy versus non-antithrombotic therapy for the 45 days following OAC monotherapy. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-fatal bleeding during a maximum of 4 years of follow-up. Major bleeding or clinically relevant non-fatal bleeding is defined as Type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. The NAPT-LAAC trial will determine the probable non-inferiority of long-term non-antithrombotic therapy to aspirin monotherapy in patients with NVAF who undergo LAAC. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07125417; jRCTs031250110).

非瓣膜性房颤经皮左心房附件闭合后无抗血栓治疗与单抗血小板治疗:多中心、随机、非低效性NAPT-LAAC试验的原理和设计
非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者经皮左心耳闭合术(LAAC)后抗血栓治疗的现行标准方案推荐长期使用抗血小板药物。然而,这一建议没有足够的临床证据支持。由于LAAC是治疗高危出血患者的一种治疗选择,因此有必要明确LAAC后是否真的需要长期抗血小板治疗。非抗血栓性与。左心耳关闭后单抗血小板治疗(NAPT-LAAC)试验,一项前瞻性、随机、对照、开放标签、盲终点多中心研究,将在日本进行。该研究旨在评估非瓣膜性房颤和高风险出血患者在LAAC术后接受口服抗凝剂(OAC)单药治疗45天后,非抗血栓治疗是否不逊色于抗血小板单药治疗。CHA2DS2-VA评分≥2且成功行LAAC的非瓣膜性房颤患者符合入选条件。总共500名接受LAAC的患者将在OAC单药治疗后的45天内随机(1:1)分配到阿司匹林单药治疗和非抗血栓治疗。在最长4年的随访期间,主要结局是全因死亡率、心肌梗死、卒中、全身性栓塞、大出血和临床相关非致死性出血的综合结果。根据出血学术研究联盟的定义,大出血或临床相关的非致命性出血定义为2型、3型或5型出血。NAPT-LAAC试验将确定在接受LAAC治疗的非瓣膜性房颤患者中,长期非抗血栓治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗的可能非劣效性。(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07125417; jRCTs031250110)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书