Semantic Intrusion Errors Overcome the Impact of Literacy and Educational Attainment in Black/African Americans with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment.

阿尔茨海默氏病研究进展(英文) Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.4236/aad.2025.144008
Alexandra Ortega, Kirsten Horne Crenshaw, Triana Abel, Carlos Valentín-Camuñas, Stephanie Remedios, Brooke Bosworth, Sofia Ramirez, Dylan Hinton, Aleksandra Nedza, Elizabeth A Crocco, Rosie E Curiel-Cid, David Loewenstein
{"title":"Semantic Intrusion Errors Overcome the Impact of Literacy and Educational Attainment in Black/African Americans with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Alexandra Ortega, Kirsten Horne Crenshaw, Triana Abel, Carlos Valentín-Camuñas, Stephanie Remedios, Brooke Bosworth, Sofia Ramirez, Dylan Hinton, Aleksandra Nedza, Elizabeth A Crocco, Rosie E Curiel-Cid, David Loewenstein","doi":"10.4236/aad.2025.144008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Loewenstein-Acevedo Scale for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) is a novel test of learning and inability to recover from proactive interference. It has been successfully employed with older adults at risk for cognitive impairment but the association between literacy, educational achievement, and LASSI-L performance in underserved Black/African American (B/AA) older adults remains unknown. 83 participants were evaluated as part of a longitudinal observational study to render a consensus diagnosis based on comprehensive clinical history and neuropsychological evaluation. Participants were classified into two groups: 43 were diagnosed with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 40 were cognitively unimpaired (CU). The Wide Range Achievement Test-IV (WRAT-IV) was used to determine levels of literacy. Participants completed the LASSI-L, an AD sensitive cognitive challenge test which was not utilized for diagnosis to avoid circularity. The CU group outperformed the aMCI group across all LASSI-L measures after demographic covariate adjustment. Robust associations were found between education, literacy, and correct responses on different LASSI-L word lists (but not semantic intrusion errors). In contrast, aMCI participants largely exhibited no associations between LASSI-L indices and literacy effects. Stepwise logistic regression achieved an overall accuracy of 81% in classifying cognitive status (84% CU specificity, 71% aMCI sensitivity). Literacy was related to certain LASSI-L measures of learning in CU participants, but not among individuals with aMCI. Even when adjusting for demographic covariates, the LASSI-L effectively distinguished B/AA CU and aMCI groups. Results underscore the practicality of the LASSI-L to assess cognitive impairment in individuals with lower literacy proficiency, as our model correctly distinguish 84% of cognitively unimpaired individuals and 71% of individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":57126,"journal":{"name":"阿尔茨海默氏病研究进展(英文)","volume":"14 4","pages":"117-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13089977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"阿尔茨海默氏病研究进展(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/aad.2025.144008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Loewenstein-Acevedo Scale for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) is a novel test of learning and inability to recover from proactive interference. It has been successfully employed with older adults at risk for cognitive impairment but the association between literacy, educational achievement, and LASSI-L performance in underserved Black/African American (B/AA) older adults remains unknown. 83 participants were evaluated as part of a longitudinal observational study to render a consensus diagnosis based on comprehensive clinical history and neuropsychological evaluation. Participants were classified into two groups: 43 were diagnosed with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 40 were cognitively unimpaired (CU). The Wide Range Achievement Test-IV (WRAT-IV) was used to determine levels of literacy. Participants completed the LASSI-L, an AD sensitive cognitive challenge test which was not utilized for diagnosis to avoid circularity. The CU group outperformed the aMCI group across all LASSI-L measures after demographic covariate adjustment. Robust associations were found between education, literacy, and correct responses on different LASSI-L word lists (but not semantic intrusion errors). In contrast, aMCI participants largely exhibited no associations between LASSI-L indices and literacy effects. Stepwise logistic regression achieved an overall accuracy of 81% in classifying cognitive status (84% CU specificity, 71% aMCI sensitivity). Literacy was related to certain LASSI-L measures of learning in CU participants, but not among individuals with aMCI. Even when adjusting for demographic covariates, the LASSI-L effectively distinguished B/AA CU and aMCI groups. Results underscore the practicality of the LASSI-L to assess cognitive impairment in individuals with lower literacy proficiency, as our model correctly distinguish 84% of cognitively unimpaired individuals and 71% of individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

语义入侵错误克服有或无轻度认知障碍的黑人/非裔美国人读写能力和受教育程度的影响。
Loewenstein-Acevedo语义干扰与学习量表(lasi - l)是一种新的测试学习能力和从主动干扰中恢复能力的量表。它已经成功地应用于有认知障碍风险的老年人,但在缺乏服务的黑人/非裔美国人(B/AA)老年人中,读写能力、教育成就和LASSI-L表现之间的关系尚不清楚。83名参与者被评估为纵向观察研究的一部分,以提供基于综合临床病史和神经心理学评估的共识诊断。参与者被分为两组:43人被诊断为遗忘性轻度认知障碍(aMCI), 40人被诊断为认知未受损(CU)。广泛成就测试- iv (WRAT-IV)被用来确定文化水平。参与者完成了lasi - l,一项AD敏感认知挑战测试,该测试不用于诊断,以避免循环。在人口统计协变量调整后,CU组在所有lasi - l测量中优于aMCI组。在不同的lasi - l单词列表上,教育程度、读写能力和正确反应之间存在显著关联(但不存在语义入侵错误)。相比之下,aMCI参与者在很大程度上没有表现出lasi - l指数与识字效果之间的关联。逐步逻辑回归对认知状态分类的总体准确率为81% (CU特异性为84%,aMCI敏感性为71%)。读写能力与CU参与者的某些lasi - l学习测量有关,但与aMCI个体无关。即使在调整人口统计协变量时,lasi - l也能有效区分B/AA CU和aMCI组。结果强调了LASSI-L评估读写能力较低个体认知障碍的实用性,因为我们的模型正确区分了84%的认知正常个体和71%的健忘轻度认知障碍个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书