Exploring individual differences in volitional personality state and trait change: The role of motivation and engagement during a 12-week intervention.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
European Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1177/08902070251374365
Gabriel Olaru, Mirjam Stieger, Christoph Flückiger, Brent W Roberts, Mathias Allemand
{"title":"Exploring individual differences in volitional personality state and trait change: The role of motivation and engagement during a 12-week intervention.","authors":"Gabriel Olaru, Mirjam Stieger, Christoph Flückiger, Brent W Roberts, Mathias Allemand","doi":"10.1177/08902070251374365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies suggest that personality traits can change through interventions, but little is known about what drives individual differences in intervention gains. Based on personality development and intervention frameworks, we examined whether achieved personality state changes explain differences in trait change and whether these could be explained by participants' motivation and intervention engagement. The study was based on a 12-week personality intervention with a total of 956 participants, daily and weekly state measures, and trait self- and observer-reports. Participants who showed stronger state deviations from the initial trait level changed more in their traits in the corresponding direction. Both state and trait changes were stronger if participants were more committed to their change goal, completed more implementation intentions, and enjoyed their implementations more (i.e., reinforcement). In contrast, the strength of the desire to change, expected attainability, and beliefs in the changeability of personality had no consistent effects-but individual differences were limited as most participants scored highly on these motivational aspects. The control group exhibited no mean-level changes or effects of any of these covariates. Taken together, these findings support key components of volitional change theories and can help guide future personalized intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":"40 3","pages":"675-693"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13089858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070251374365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that personality traits can change through interventions, but little is known about what drives individual differences in intervention gains. Based on personality development and intervention frameworks, we examined whether achieved personality state changes explain differences in trait change and whether these could be explained by participants' motivation and intervention engagement. The study was based on a 12-week personality intervention with a total of 956 participants, daily and weekly state measures, and trait self- and observer-reports. Participants who showed stronger state deviations from the initial trait level changed more in their traits in the corresponding direction. Both state and trait changes were stronger if participants were more committed to their change goal, completed more implementation intentions, and enjoyed their implementations more (i.e., reinforcement). In contrast, the strength of the desire to change, expected attainability, and beliefs in the changeability of personality had no consistent effects-but individual differences were limited as most participants scored highly on these motivational aspects. The control group exhibited no mean-level changes or effects of any of these covariates. Taken together, these findings support key components of volitional change theories and can help guide future personalized intervention efforts.

探索意志人格状态和特质改变的个体差异:动机和投入在12周干预中的作用。
最近的研究表明,人格特征可以通过干预来改变,但人们对干预效果中导致个体差异的因素知之甚少。基于人格发展和干预框架,我们考察了人格状态的改变是否可以解释特质变化的差异,以及这些差异是否可以通过参与者的动机和干预参与来解释。这项研究是基于一项为期12周的人格干预,共有956名参与者,每天和每周的状态测量,以及自我和观察者的特质报告。状态偏离初始特质水平越强的被试,其特质在相应方向上的变化越大。如果参与者更致力于他们的改变目标,完成更多的实现意图,并且更享受他们的实现(即强化),状态和特质的变化都更强。相比之下,改变欲望的强度、预期可达性和对个性可变性的信念并没有一致的影响——但个体差异是有限的,因为大多数参与者在这些动机方面得分很高。对照组没有表现出这些协变量的平均水平变化或影响。综上所述,这些发现支持了意志改变理论的关键组成部分,并有助于指导未来的个性化干预工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Personality
European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
8.50%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书