Comparison of Medial Meniscus Root Repair with Two Surgical Techniques Using Medial and Lateral Tunnels: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ali Shahsavari Pour, Ali Hosseini, Iman Ghomashi, Sajjad Jafari, Zahra Sarabandi, Fatemeh Ahmadi
{"title":"Comparison of Medial Meniscus Root Repair with Two Surgical Techniques Using Medial and Lateral Tunnels: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ali Shahsavari Pour, Ali Hosseini, Iman Ghomashi, Sajjad Jafari, Zahra Sarabandi, Fatemeh Ahmadi","doi":"10.22038/abjs.2025.86673.3939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of trans-tibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root using the lateral tibial tunnel versus the conventional medial tibial tunnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, patients with posterior root tears of the medial meniscus who underwent surgical repair were divided into two groups based on the tibial tunnel used for fixation: the medial tunnel technique (Group 1) and the lateral tunnel technique (Group 2). The Lysholm score was recorded preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to assess knee function and the return to daily and sports activities. Demographic data, including age, gender, and associated injuries, were also documented. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-sample t-test, independent t-test, and Pearson correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Lysholm score in the medial tunnel group was 92.67 ± 9.28, while in the lateral tunnel group, it was 88.02 ± 13.59. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in the Lysholm scores between the two groups (p > 0.05), indicating comparable clinical outcomes for both techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both medial and lateral tibial tunnel techniques for trans-tibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus root yield comparable functional outcomes. The choice of tunnel may be guided by anatomical considerations or surgeon preference, as no significant difference was observed in postoperative recovery, as measured by the Lysholm score.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"14 1","pages":"24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13084181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2025.86673.3939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of trans-tibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root using the lateral tibial tunnel versus the conventional medial tibial tunnel.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, patients with posterior root tears of the medial meniscus who underwent surgical repair were divided into two groups based on the tibial tunnel used for fixation: the medial tunnel technique (Group 1) and the lateral tunnel technique (Group 2). The Lysholm score was recorded preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively to assess knee function and the return to daily and sports activities. Demographic data, including age, gender, and associated injuries, were also documented. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-sample t-test, independent t-test, and Pearson correlation.

Results: The mean Lysholm score in the medial tunnel group was 92.67 ± 9.28, while in the lateral tunnel group, it was 88.02 ± 13.59. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in the Lysholm scores between the two groups (p > 0.05), indicating comparable clinical outcomes for both techniques.

Conclusion: Both medial and lateral tibial tunnel techniques for trans-tibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus root yield comparable functional outcomes. The choice of tunnel may be guided by anatomical considerations or surgeon preference, as no significant difference was observed in postoperative recovery, as measured by the Lysholm score.

采用内侧和外侧隧道两种手术技术修复内侧半月板根的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较胫骨外侧隧道与传统胫骨内侧隧道经胫骨拉拔修复内侧半月板后根的临床效果。方法:在本前瞻性队列研究中,将手术修复的内侧半月板后根撕裂患者根据固定使用的胫骨隧道分为内侧隧道技术组(1组)和外侧隧道技术组(2组)。术前和术后12个月记录Lysholm评分,以评估膝关节功能和日常活动和运动的恢复情况。还记录了人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别和相关伤害。采用单样本t检验、独立t检验和Pearson相关进行统计分析。结果:内侧隧道组平均Lysholm评分为92.67±9.28,外侧隧道组平均Lysholm评分为88.02±13.59。统计学分析显示两组之间的Lysholm评分无显著差异(p < 0.05),表明两种技术的临床结果相当。结论:内侧和外侧胫骨隧道技术用于经胫骨拔出修复内侧半月板根的功能效果相当。根据Lysholm评分,在术后恢复方面没有观察到明显的差异,因此隧道的选择可以根据解剖学的考虑或外科医生的偏好来指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书