An optimized method for setting Internal Quality Control targets (mean and limits) for multi-instrument Internal Quality Control strategies in hematology?

Q2 Medicine
Tony Badrick, Mathieu Bernard, Lionel Tabard, Jean-Marc Giannoli
{"title":"An optimized method for setting Internal Quality Control targets (mean and limits) for multi-instrument Internal Quality Control strategies in hematology?","authors":"Tony Badrick, Mathieu Bernard, Lionel Tabard, Jean-Marc Giannoli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Internal Quality Control (IQC) procedures must evolve as laboratory practices change to meet the requirements of higher patient volumes and the greater need for comparability of results across laboratories. This study developed a strategy to detect significant errors in routine hematology analytical processes using a novel approach to setting IQC material targets (mean and limits) across multiple instruments. This has not been described for hematology laboratories before.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>The approach described used a common IQC sample mean and limits determined from a manufacturer-based peer group using the same IQC material. The limits involved a new parameter, the random error of the peer group analyzers around their own mean (SD<sub>intra</sub>90), to detect bias or imprecision. The model was assessed over five months using 17 analyzers that measured hemoglobin and red cell count. Using a common mean requires that the different analyzers exhibit no significant bias.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The model effectively controls analytical error in a network of laboratories using the same measurement system. This model aligns with the best theoretical principles for patient risk reduction and harmonizes practices for acceptance and rejection across the network.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>The model presents an approach to IQC that meets the demands of real-world practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"37 2","pages":"306-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13088489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Internal Quality Control (IQC) procedures must evolve as laboratory practices change to meet the requirements of higher patient volumes and the greater need for comparability of results across laboratories. This study developed a strategy to detect significant errors in routine hematology analytical processes using a novel approach to setting IQC material targets (mean and limits) across multiple instruments. This has not been described for hematology laboratories before.

Content: The approach described used a common IQC sample mean and limits determined from a manufacturer-based peer group using the same IQC material. The limits involved a new parameter, the random error of the peer group analyzers around their own mean (SDintra90), to detect bias or imprecision. The model was assessed over five months using 17 analyzers that measured hemoglobin and red cell count. Using a common mean requires that the different analyzers exhibit no significant bias.

Summary: The model effectively controls analytical error in a network of laboratories using the same measurement system. This model aligns with the best theoretical principles for patient risk reduction and harmonizes practices for acceptance and rejection across the network.

Outlook: The model presents an approach to IQC that meets the demands of real-world practice.

血液学多仪器内部质量控制策略设定内部质量控制目标(平均值和限)的优化方法?
目的:内部质量控制(IQC)程序必须随着实验室实践的变化而发展,以满足患者数量增加的要求和对实验室间结果可比性的更大需求。本研究开发了一种策略来检测常规血液学分析过程中的重大错误,使用一种新颖的方法来设置跨多个仪器的IQC材料目标(平均值和限值)。这在血液学实验室之前还没有被描述过。内容:所描述的方法使用了一个通用的IQC样本平均值和从使用相同IQC材料的基于制造商的同行组确定的限值。限制涉及到一个新的参数,即同行组分析者在他们自己的平均值周围的随机误差(SDintra90),以检测偏差或不精确。该模型在5个月的时间里使用了17种分析仪来测量血红蛋白和红细胞计数。使用一个共同的平均值要求不同的分析仪没有显着的偏差。该模型有效地控制了使用同一测量系统的实验室网络中的分析误差。该模型与降低患者风险的最佳理论原则相一致,并协调了整个网络中接受和拒绝的实践。展望:该模型提出了一种符合现实世界实践要求的IQC方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书