Simplified short-term electricity market designs: Evidence from Europe

IF 2.2 Q1 Social Sciences
Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2025.107486
Christoph Graf
{"title":"Simplified short-term electricity market designs: Evidence from Europe","authors":"Christoph Graf","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2025.107486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electrical power is transmitted through a network, and the flows on this network are governed by the laws of physics. In market designs that do not accurately account for these realities, secondary mechanisms need to be deployed on top of a hypothetical dispatch originating from an “unconstrained” (or inaccurately constrained) market mechanism. This sequential approach can create operational risks, lead to inefficiencies, and distort the incentives of market participants in both the short and long run. I review these incentives by focusing on the Italian and Great Britain markets. Both systems employ market designs that, in line with the prevalent European design, are largely agnostic to the flow of power and other system constraints. The consequences of these market design choices are increasingly significant as the systems move toward decarbonization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"Article 107486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619025000314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrical power is transmitted through a network, and the flows on this network are governed by the laws of physics. In market designs that do not accurately account for these realities, secondary mechanisms need to be deployed on top of a hypothetical dispatch originating from an “unconstrained” (or inaccurately constrained) market mechanism. This sequential approach can create operational risks, lead to inefficiencies, and distort the incentives of market participants in both the short and long run. I review these incentives by focusing on the Italian and Great Britain markets. Both systems employ market designs that, in line with the prevalent European design, are largely agnostic to the flow of power and other system constraints. The consequences of these market design choices are increasingly significant as the systems move toward decarbonization.
简化短期电力市场设计:来自欧洲的证据
电力通过一个网络传输,而这个网络上的电流受物理定律的支配。在不能准确解释这些现实的市场设计中,二级机制需要部署在来自“无约束”(或不准确约束)市场机制的假设调度之上。这种循序渐进的方法会产生操作风险,导致效率低下,并在短期和长期内扭曲市场参与者的动机。我通过关注意大利和英国市场来回顾这些激励措施。这两个体系采用的市场设计,与欧洲流行的设计一致,在很大程度上不受权力流动和其他制度约束的影响。随着系统走向脱碳,这些市场设计选择的后果越来越重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书