Does Mixing Trees and Crops Enhance Soil Organic Carbon Content in China? Evidence From Integrating Field Experiments With a Meta-Analysis

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tao Yang, Xueying Ouyang, Bo Wang, Cheng Xu, Xiaomin Ge, Luozhong Tang
{"title":"Does Mixing Trees and Crops Enhance Soil Organic Carbon Content in China? Evidence From Integrating Field Experiments With a Meta-Analysis","authors":"Tao Yang, Xueying Ouyang, Bo Wang, Cheng Xu, Xiaomin Ge, Luozhong Tang","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixing trees and crops (MTC) practices are emerging as a viable strategy for promoting sustainable agriculture in developing countries, such as China. While many studies have reported data on the relationship between soil organic carbon (SOC) and MTC practices, a comprehensive quantitative analysis of their effects on SOC content nationwide in China is still lacking. In the present study, we integrated field experiments with a national-scale meta-analysis to quantitatively analyze the effects of MTC practices on SOC content in China. The findings of the field experiments and subsequent meta-analysis provide evidence indicating that MTC practices significantly enhance SOC content in China. In contrast to single-cropping crop practices, MTC practices in China significantly increased the SOC content by 26.6% overall. In contrast to single-cropping tree practices, MTC practices in China increased the SOC content by 20.0% overall. Nevertheless, it is necessary to acknowledge that there was high variability in the effects of MTC practices on SOC content across different regions of China. Additionally, the effects of MTC practices on SOC content could be affected by climatic conditions, tree age, tree species, crop species, and soil depths. Among them, crop species, tree age, and tree species were the most important factors affecting SOC. Overall, from the perspective of enhancing SOC in China, MTC may be a more preferable sustainable practice than single cropping. However, factors such as economic benefits, food security, and other ecological values should also be considered when formulating sustainable agricultural management strategies.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixing trees and crops (MTC) practices are emerging as a viable strategy for promoting sustainable agriculture in developing countries, such as China. While many studies have reported data on the relationship between soil organic carbon (SOC) and MTC practices, a comprehensive quantitative analysis of their effects on SOC content nationwide in China is still lacking. In the present study, we integrated field experiments with a national-scale meta-analysis to quantitatively analyze the effects of MTC practices on SOC content in China. The findings of the field experiments and subsequent meta-analysis provide evidence indicating that MTC practices significantly enhance SOC content in China. In contrast to single-cropping crop practices, MTC practices in China significantly increased the SOC content by 26.6% overall. In contrast to single-cropping tree practices, MTC practices in China increased the SOC content by 20.0% overall. Nevertheless, it is necessary to acknowledge that there was high variability in the effects of MTC practices on SOC content across different regions of China. Additionally, the effects of MTC practices on SOC content could be affected by climatic conditions, tree age, tree species, crop species, and soil depths. Among them, crop species, tree age, and tree species were the most important factors affecting SOC. Overall, from the perspective of enhancing SOC in China, MTC may be a more preferable sustainable practice than single cropping. However, factors such as economic benefits, food security, and other ecological values should also be considered when formulating sustainable agricultural management strategies.
树木与作物混合是否能提高中国土壤有机碳含量?整合现场实验与元分析的证据
在中国等发展中国家,混合种植树木和作物(MTC)的做法正在成为促进可持续农业的可行战略。虽然许多研究报告了土壤有机碳(SOC)与MTC实践之间关系的数据,但对中国土壤有机碳(SOC)含量影响的综合定量分析仍然缺乏。在本研究中,我们将田间试验与国家尺度的荟萃分析相结合,定量分析了MTC实践对中国土壤有机碳含量的影响。田间试验和meta分析结果表明,MTC实践显著提高了中国土壤有机碳含量。与单作相比,中国MTC做法显著提高了土壤有机碳含量26.6%。与单季树相比,中国的MTC做法总体上提高了20.0%的有机碳含量。然而,有必要认识到,在中国不同地区,MTC实践对土壤有机碳含量的影响存在很大的差异。此外,MTC措施对土壤有机碳含量的影响可能受气候条件、树龄、树种、作物种类和土壤深度的影响。其中,作物种类、树龄和树种是影响土壤有机碳最重要的因素。综上所述,从提高中国土壤有机碳水平的角度来看,复合种植可能是比单作更可取的可持续做法。然而,在制定可持续农业管理战略时,还应考虑经济效益、粮食安全和其他生态价值等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书