RAMP-UP: Pharmacist-Led Methadone Titration for Hospitalized Patients With Opioid Use Disorder.

Emily R Casey, Tanya Uritsky, Liana Soyfer, Lin Xu, Kevin G Lynch, Samantha Zwiebel, Margaret Lowenstein, Ashish Thakrar
{"title":"RAMP-UP: Pharmacist-Led Methadone Titration for Hospitalized Patients With Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Emily R Casey, Tanya Uritsky, Liana Soyfer, Lin Xu, Kevin G Lynch, Samantha Zwiebel, Margaret Lowenstein, Ashish Thakrar","doi":"10.1177/29767342261433344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals increasingly start methadone treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Rapid methadone titration has been described in hospitals with addiction consult teams; however, most hospitals lack these specialty services. We evaluated whether a pharmacist-led rapid methadone titration protocol (\"RAMP-UP\") increased the proportion of hospitalizations that reached a minimally therapeutic dose of methadone (≥60 mg) before discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post study comparing outcomes 7 months before versus 7 months after the implementation of RAMP-UP. The study included all adults admitted to a large academic medical center between March 2022 and April 2023 who newly initiated methadone for OUD. We used multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations to evaluate the primary outcome of achieving a total daily methadone dose of at least 60 mg by hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included days to therapeutic dose, total daily methadone dose, and opioid-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified n = 155 admissions, 55 pre-intervention and 100 post-intervention, among 124 unique patients with OUD. After RAMP-UP, a higher proportion of encounters reached ≥60 mg total daily dose (TDD) of methadone, but this difference was not significant in adjusted analyses (45.5% pre-implementation vs 60.0% post-implementation, <i>P</i> = .06). Post-implementation encounters had higher methadone TDD on discharge (62 vs 55 mg; <i>P</i> = .04) and, among those who reached 60 mg TDD, achieved this dose faster (9.0 vs 4.0 days, <i>P</i> < .001). Safety events were uncommon and similar (11.0% vs 12.7%; <i>P</i> = .80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacist-guided rapid titration accelerated attainment of therapeutic methadone doses and did not increase adverse events. Although the adjusted increase in the proportion achieving ≥60 mg TDD by discharge was not statistically significant, these findings demonstrate how inpatient clinical pharmacists can modernize inpatient OUD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342261433344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342261433344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitals increasingly start methadone treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Rapid methadone titration has been described in hospitals with addiction consult teams; however, most hospitals lack these specialty services. We evaluated whether a pharmacist-led rapid methadone titration protocol ("RAMP-UP") increased the proportion of hospitalizations that reached a minimally therapeutic dose of methadone (≥60 mg) before discharge.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post study comparing outcomes 7 months before versus 7 months after the implementation of RAMP-UP. The study included all adults admitted to a large academic medical center between March 2022 and April 2023 who newly initiated methadone for OUD. We used multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations to evaluate the primary outcome of achieving a total daily methadone dose of at least 60 mg by hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included days to therapeutic dose, total daily methadone dose, and opioid-related safety events.

Results: We identified n = 155 admissions, 55 pre-intervention and 100 post-intervention, among 124 unique patients with OUD. After RAMP-UP, a higher proportion of encounters reached ≥60 mg total daily dose (TDD) of methadone, but this difference was not significant in adjusted analyses (45.5% pre-implementation vs 60.0% post-implementation, P = .06). Post-implementation encounters had higher methadone TDD on discharge (62 vs 55 mg; P = .04) and, among those who reached 60 mg TDD, achieved this dose faster (9.0 vs 4.0 days, P < .001). Safety events were uncommon and similar (11.0% vs 12.7%; P = .80).

Conclusions: Pharmacist-guided rapid titration accelerated attainment of therapeutic methadone doses and did not increase adverse events. Although the adjusted increase in the proportion achieving ≥60 mg TDD by discharge was not statistically significant, these findings demonstrate how inpatient clinical pharmacists can modernize inpatient OUD care.

加速:药剂师主导的美沙酮滴定治疗阿片类药物使用障碍住院患者。
背景:越来越多的医院开始美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)。在有成瘾咨询小组的医院中,已经描述了快速美沙酮滴定;然而,大多数医院缺乏这些专业服务。我们评估了药剂师主导的快速美沙酮滴定方案(“RAMP-UP”)是否增加了出院前达到最低美沙酮治疗剂量(≥60 mg)的住院比例。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性、准实验、前后研究,比较了实施RAMP-UP前7个月和实施RAMP-UP后7个月的结果。该研究包括2022年3月至2023年4月期间在一家大型学术医疗中心接受美沙酮治疗OUD的所有成年人。我们使用多变量回归和广义估计方程来评估出院时每日美沙酮总剂量至少达到60mg的主要结局。次要结局包括到治疗剂量的天数、每日总美沙酮剂量和阿片类药物相关安全事件。结果:我们在124例独特的OUD患者中确定了n = 155例入院,干预前55例,干预后100例。在RAMP-UP后,接触≥60mg总日剂量(TDD)美沙酮的比例较高,但在调整分析中差异不显著(实施前45.5% vs实施后60.0%,P = 0.06)。实施后就诊的患者在出院时美沙酮TDD较高(62 vs 55 mg; P =。在TDD达到60mg的患者中,达到该剂量的时间更快(9.0天vs 4.0天,P P = 0.80)。结论:药师指导下的快速滴定加速了美沙酮治疗剂量的实现,并没有增加不良事件。虽然调整后出院时达到≥60 mg TDD比例的增加没有统计学意义,但这些发现表明住院临床药师如何使住院OUD护理现代化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书