Baseline blood eosinophil count does not predict short-term changes in oscillometric psarameters in steroid-naïve asthma.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-28 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2026.2660094
Osamu Matsuno
{"title":"Baseline blood eosinophil count does not predict short-term changes in oscillometric psarameters in steroid-naïve asthma.","authors":"Osamu Matsuno","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2026.2660094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral blood eosinophil (PBE) count is widely used as a biomarker to guide treatment decisions in asthma. However, whether eosinophil levels predict early changes in airway mechanics assessed by oscillometry remains unclear, particularly in steroid-naïve patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether baseline PBE levels are associated with early changes in oscillometric indices of airway function in steroid-naïve asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with steroid-naïve asthma who underwent oscillometry at baseline and after 12 wk of inhaled corticosteroid-based therapy. Patients were stratified according to baseline PBE count (≥300 vs <300 cells/μL). Percentage changes in R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, resonant frequency (Fres), and area of low-frequency reactance (ALX) were compared using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. Effect sizes were estimated using the Hodges-Lehmann method with exact confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 patients were included (<i>n</i> = 33 with eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL; <i>n</i> = 24 with eosinophils <300 cells/μL). No significant differences were observed between groups in percentage changes of oscillometric parameters. Hodges-Lehmann estimates of group differences were small, and all confidence intervals crossed zero, indicating no clinically meaningful association between baseline eosinophil levels and early oscillometric improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In steroid-naïve asthma, baseline PBE count does not appear to predict early changes in oscillometric indices. These findings suggest that baseline PBE counts may be informative for spirometric responses to inhaled corticosteroid-based therapy, whereas their utility for anticipating early changes in oscillometric indices is limited. Spirometry and oscillometry may therefore provide complementary, rather than interchangeable, information when assessing early treatment responses in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1233-1240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2026.2660094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral blood eosinophil (PBE) count is widely used as a biomarker to guide treatment decisions in asthma. However, whether eosinophil levels predict early changes in airway mechanics assessed by oscillometry remains unclear, particularly in steroid-naïve patients.

Objective: To determine whether baseline PBE levels are associated with early changes in oscillometric indices of airway function in steroid-naïve asthma.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with steroid-naïve asthma who underwent oscillometry at baseline and after 12 wk of inhaled corticosteroid-based therapy. Patients were stratified according to baseline PBE count (≥300 vs <300 cells/μL). Percentage changes in R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, resonant frequency (Fres), and area of low-frequency reactance (ALX) were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Effect sizes were estimated using the Hodges-Lehmann method with exact confidence intervals.

Results: A total of 57 patients were included (n = 33 with eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL; n = 24 with eosinophils <300 cells/μL). No significant differences were observed between groups in percentage changes of oscillometric parameters. Hodges-Lehmann estimates of group differences were small, and all confidence intervals crossed zero, indicating no clinically meaningful association between baseline eosinophil levels and early oscillometric improvement.

Conclusions: In steroid-naïve asthma, baseline PBE count does not appear to predict early changes in oscillometric indices. These findings suggest that baseline PBE counts may be informative for spirometric responses to inhaled corticosteroid-based therapy, whereas their utility for anticipating early changes in oscillometric indices is limited. Spirometry and oscillometry may therefore provide complementary, rather than interchangeable, information when assessing early treatment responses in asthma.

基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数不能预测Steroid-Naïve哮喘患者振荡参数的短期变化。
外周血嗜酸性粒细胞(PBE)计数被广泛用作指导哮喘治疗决策的生物标志物。然而,嗜酸性粒细胞水平是否能预测振荡测量法评估的早期气道力学变化仍不清楚,特别是在steroid-naïve患者中。目的确定基线PBE水平是否与steroid-naïve哮喘患者气道功能振荡指标的早期变化相关。方法回顾性分析在基线和吸入皮质类固醇治疗12周后接受振荡测量的成人steroid-naïve哮喘患者。根据基线PBE计数(≥300 vs
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书