Discrimination in autism as measured by minimal group and sheer difference experiments

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-12 Epub Date: 2026-04-17 DOI:10.1111/bjop.70074
Zachary Tan, Xizhuo Zou, Daniel P. Skorich, Eliane Deschrijver
{"title":"Discrimination in autism as measured by minimal group and sheer difference experiments","authors":"Zachary Tan,&nbsp;Xizhuo Zou,&nbsp;Daniel P. Skorich,&nbsp;Eliane Deschrijver","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Autistic individuals often show fewer social biases than neurotypical people. Whether they show fewer discriminatory tendencies is however unclear. The present study examined discriminatory tendencies in autistic versus neurotypical individuals in the minimal group paradigm and the novel ‘sheer difference’ paradigm. Seventy-five autistic and neurotypical participants were recruited for each group, totalling 150 participants. In the ‘sheer difference’ paradigm, participants received a coin toss outcome in each trial, after which they were tasked to assign points to a single other participant who had received the same versus a different coin flip outcome. In the minimal group paradigm, participants were assigned to a group based on coin flips, and then, they assigned points to members of their own group versus the other group. The ‘sheer difference’ paradigm contributes to the study's aims by testing in autism whether discrimination can also follow from <i>individual</i> rather than group-based difference versus sameness. We found that discriminatory tendencies can come about on both individual and group levels. We did not find clear differences between autistic and neurotypical populations, with implications for the way in which we conceptualize discrimination and understand autism.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"117 4","pages":"1449-1468"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjop.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.70074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autistic individuals often show fewer social biases than neurotypical people. Whether they show fewer discriminatory tendencies is however unclear. The present study examined discriminatory tendencies in autistic versus neurotypical individuals in the minimal group paradigm and the novel ‘sheer difference’ paradigm. Seventy-five autistic and neurotypical participants were recruited for each group, totalling 150 participants. In the ‘sheer difference’ paradigm, participants received a coin toss outcome in each trial, after which they were tasked to assign points to a single other participant who had received the same versus a different coin flip outcome. In the minimal group paradigm, participants were assigned to a group based on coin flips, and then, they assigned points to members of their own group versus the other group. The ‘sheer difference’ paradigm contributes to the study's aims by testing in autism whether discrimination can also follow from individual rather than group-based difference versus sameness. We found that discriminatory tendencies can come about on both individual and group levels. We did not find clear differences between autistic and neurotypical populations, with implications for the way in which we conceptualize discrimination and understand autism.

通过最小群体和完全差异实验来衡量自闭症的歧视。
自闭症患者通常比正常人表现出更少的社会偏见。然而,他们是否表现出较少的歧视倾向尚不清楚。本研究在最小群体范式和新颖的“绝对差异”范式下考察了自闭症个体与神经正常个体的歧视倾向。每组招募75名自闭症和神经正常的参与者,总共150名参与者。在“绝对差异”范式中,参与者在每次试验中都得到一个抛硬币的结果,之后他们的任务是给另一个得到相同或不同抛硬币结果的参与者打分。在最小群体范式中,参与者被分配到一个基于抛硬币的群体中,然后,他们给自己群体的成员和另一群体的成员分配分数。“绝对差异”范式通过测试自闭症患者的歧视是否也能从个体而不是群体的差异与相同中产生,从而有助于研究的目标。我们发现,歧视倾向在个人和群体层面都可能出现。我们没有发现自闭症人群和神经正常人群之间的明显差异,这对我们概念化歧视和理解自闭症的方式有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书