How is integrated reporting quality influential on ESG risk scores? Pillar-Based evidence from international banks

Innovation and Green Development Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.igd.2026.100350
Mert Sarıoğlu , Dilvin Taşkın , Mustafa Tevfik Kartal
{"title":"How is integrated reporting quality influential on ESG risk scores? Pillar-Based evidence from international banks","authors":"Mert Sarıoğlu ,&nbsp;Dilvin Taşkın ,&nbsp;Mustafa Tevfik Kartal","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2026.100350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reporting quality and environment, social, and governance (ESG) scores have become critical in investment and trading decisions. Accordingly, this study finds out the association between Integrated Reporting Quality (IRQ), its pillars, and ESG risk (ESGR) scores of 33 international banks, having Sustainalytics’ ESGR scores and publishing integrated reports between 2020 and 2023. IRQ scores are calculated by considering “Fundamental Concepts”, “Guiding Principles”, and “Content Elements” pillars of IR framework. The findings show that IRQ and its pillars are associated with lower ESGR scores. Also, the robustness of the results is confirmed through green bond issuance and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions. Therefore, the critical contribution of this study is to empirically reveal the role of IRQ in each pillar and to relate them to ESGR. It introduces a multi-pillar scoring approach that provides a replicable framework for assessing IRQ and ESGR scores. By focusing on ESGR, this study suggests a risk-based perspective on IR and presents how reporting quality functions as a governance mechanism for mitigating sustainability-related risks. The results enable a better theoretical understanding of IR as both a risk mitigation and stakeholder communication mechanism and provides insights for regulators, investors, and institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753126000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reporting quality and environment, social, and governance (ESG) scores have become critical in investment and trading decisions. Accordingly, this study finds out the association between Integrated Reporting Quality (IRQ), its pillars, and ESG risk (ESGR) scores of 33 international banks, having Sustainalytics’ ESGR scores and publishing integrated reports between 2020 and 2023. IRQ scores are calculated by considering “Fundamental Concepts”, “Guiding Principles”, and “Content Elements” pillars of IR framework. The findings show that IRQ and its pillars are associated with lower ESGR scores. Also, the robustness of the results is confirmed through green bond issuance and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Therefore, the critical contribution of this study is to empirically reveal the role of IRQ in each pillar and to relate them to ESGR. It introduces a multi-pillar scoring approach that provides a replicable framework for assessing IRQ and ESGR scores. By focusing on ESGR, this study suggests a risk-based perspective on IR and presents how reporting quality functions as a governance mechanism for mitigating sustainability-related risks. The results enable a better theoretical understanding of IR as both a risk mitigation and stakeholder communication mechanism and provides insights for regulators, investors, and institutions.
综合报告质量如何影响ESG风险评分?来自国际银行的支柱证据
报告质量和环境、社会和治理(ESG)分数在投资和交易决策中变得至关重要。因此,本研究发现综合报告质量(IRQ)及其支柱与33家国际银行的ESG风险(ESGR)评分之间的关联,这些银行拥有Sustainalytics的ESGR评分,并在2020年至2023年之间发布综合报告。IRQ分数是通过考虑IR框架的“基本概念”、“指导原则”和“内容元素”支柱来计算的。研究结果表明,IRQ及其支柱与较低的ESGR得分有关。此外,通过绿色债券发行和二氧化碳(CO2)排放证实了结果的稳健性。因此,本研究的关键贡献在于实证地揭示了IRQ在每个支柱中的作用,并将它们与ESGR联系起来。它引入了一个多支柱评分方法,为评估IRQ和ESGR分数提供了一个可复制的框架。通过关注ESGR,本研究提出了基于风险的IR视角,并展示了报告质量如何作为一种治理机制来减轻与可持续性相关的风险。研究结果有助于更好地从理论上理解IR作为风险缓解和利益相关者沟通机制,并为监管机构、投资者和机构提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书