{"title":"Beyond birds: rethinking bird-centered pathogen models in light of insect migration","authors":"Virginia Morandini","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration redistributes biomass, nutrients, and pathogens across ecosystems. For decades, migratory birds have been treated as the default long-distance pathogen vectors, shaping both conceptual frameworks and empirical models of disease ecology. Yet this bird-centric view creates a profound bias: it overlooks trillions of insects that migrate seasonally across continents, many of them efficient pathogen vectors. Advances in radar, isotopic tracing, and genomic tools now reveal that insect flyways are structured, recurrent, and often intersect with avian routes, creating unrecognized hotspots of co-migration and potential cross-transmission. Ignoring these flows risks misattributing prevalence patterns to bird movements alone and perpetuating incomplete models of pathogen dispersal. We argue that pathogen spread should be reframed as a macroecological process emerging from the overlapping movements of multiple taxa. This requires expanding current frameworks, integrating insects into migration–disease models, and developing infrastructure capable of monitoring aerial biodiversity at continental scales. Such a shift is essential not only for ecological theory but also for applied surveillance in public health, agriculture, and wildlife conservation in a rapidly changing world.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Migration redistributes biomass, nutrients, and pathogens across ecosystems. For decades, migratory birds have been treated as the default long-distance pathogen vectors, shaping both conceptual frameworks and empirical models of disease ecology. Yet this bird-centric view creates a profound bias: it overlooks trillions of insects that migrate seasonally across continents, many of them efficient pathogen vectors. Advances in radar, isotopic tracing, and genomic tools now reveal that insect flyways are structured, recurrent, and often intersect with avian routes, creating unrecognized hotspots of co-migration and potential cross-transmission. Ignoring these flows risks misattributing prevalence patterns to bird movements alone and perpetuating incomplete models of pathogen dispersal. We argue that pathogen spread should be reframed as a macroecological process emerging from the overlapping movements of multiple taxa. This requires expanding current frameworks, integrating insects into migration–disease models, and developing infrastructure capable of monitoring aerial biodiversity at continental scales. Such a shift is essential not only for ecological theory but also for applied surveillance in public health, agriculture, and wildlife conservation in a rapidly changing world.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.