Quantifying ecological spillover contributions to mitigate supply–demand spatial mismatch: An integrated ecosystem service flow framework

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2026-04-27 Epub Date: 2026-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148285
Xiaowen Zhou , Xuesong Zhang , Hongjie Peng , Qiuyu Zou
{"title":"Quantifying ecological spillover contributions to mitigate supply–demand spatial mismatch: An integrated ecosystem service flow framework","authors":"Xiaowen Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuesong Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongjie Peng ,&nbsp;Qiuyu Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has intensified the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand, posing critical challenges for sustainable regional development. Existing assessments, largely based on static supply–demand patterns, often fail to capture the redistributive role of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) in regulating spatial ecological imbalances. To address this limitation, we propose an integrated ecosystem service flow framework that explicitly simulates ESF pathways, magnitudes, and spillover contributions, thereby linking static mismatch assessment with dynamic flow processes. Using multi-source geospatial datasets and process-based models, we quantified the spillover effects of water yield (WY), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS) across the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (UA-MRYR). Results show that ESFs substantially alleviated ecological deficits, with compensation rates of 79.68% (FP), 74.79% (WY), and 61.94% (CS). The three ESFs demonstrated distinct flow mechanisms—unidirectional hydrological routing for WY, market-regulated multi-source networks for FP, and diffusion-driven processes for CS. Integrating flow intensity, total volume, and conflict patterns, we developed a multi-dimensional zoning scheme that delineates Key Functional Zones, Scale Advantage Zones, Potential Cultivation Zones, and Efficiency Focal Zones. By translating ESF spillovers into actionable spatial governance tools, this study offers a scalable pathway for correcting ecological imbalances and guiding adaptive ecological planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"558 ","pages":"Article 148285"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652626008243","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has intensified the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand, posing critical challenges for sustainable regional development. Existing assessments, largely based on static supply–demand patterns, often fail to capture the redistributive role of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) in regulating spatial ecological imbalances. To address this limitation, we propose an integrated ecosystem service flow framework that explicitly simulates ESF pathways, magnitudes, and spillover contributions, thereby linking static mismatch assessment with dynamic flow processes. Using multi-source geospatial datasets and process-based models, we quantified the spillover effects of water yield (WY), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS) across the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (UA-MRYR). Results show that ESFs substantially alleviated ecological deficits, with compensation rates of 79.68% (FP), 74.79% (WY), and 61.94% (CS). The three ESFs demonstrated distinct flow mechanisms—unidirectional hydrological routing for WY, market-regulated multi-source networks for FP, and diffusion-driven processes for CS. Integrating flow intensity, total volume, and conflict patterns, we developed a multi-dimensional zoning scheme that delineates Key Functional Zones, Scale Advantage Zones, Potential Cultivation Zones, and Efficiency Focal Zones. By translating ESF spillovers into actionable spatial governance tools, this study offers a scalable pathway for correcting ecological imbalances and guiding adaptive ecological planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.
量化生态溢出对缓解供需空间错配的贡献:一个综合生态系统服务流框架
快速城市化加剧了生态系统服务供需的空间失配,对区域可持续发展提出了严峻挑战。现有的评估主要基于静态的供需模式,往往无法捕捉生态系统服务流量在调节空间生态失衡方面的再分配作用。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了一个集成的生态系统服务流框架,该框架明确模拟了ESF的路径、大小和溢出贡献,从而将静态错配评估与动态流动过程联系起来。利用多源地理空间数据集和基于过程的模型,对长江中游城市群的产水量(WY)、粮食生产(FP)和碳封存(CS)的溢出效应进行了量化。结果表明,ESFs显著缓解了生态赤字,补偿率分别为79.68% (FP)、74.79% (WY)和61.94% (CS)。三个ESFs展示了不同的流动机制——WY的单向水文路径,FP的市场调节多源网络,CS的扩散驱动过程。综合流量强度、总量和冲突模式,我们制定了一个多维分区方案,划分了关键功能区、规模优势区、潜在培育区和效率重点区。通过将ESF溢出效应转化为可操作的空间治理工具,本研究为快速城市化地区纠正生态失衡和指导适应性生态规划提供了可扩展的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书