Divine and Human Love: Religious Foundations of Mo Zi's Universal Love and Christian Agape

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1111/jore.70015
Song Liu, Chengjia Li
{"title":"Divine and Human Love: Religious Foundations of Mo Zi's Universal Love and Christian Agape","authors":"Song Liu,&nbsp;Chengjia Li","doi":"10.1111/jore.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines the theological foundations and ethical implications of Mo Zi's concept of “universal love” (<i>jian ai</i>) and Christian “agape,” exploring their religious dimensions, ontological bases, and contemporary significance. While existing scholarship has often emphasized the ethical similarities between these two traditions, this research provides a more nuanced theological analysis that reveals their distinctive religious foundations. Through systematic examination of Mohist writings and New Testament sources, particularly the Gospels and Johannine literature, this study demonstrates that these love concepts emerge from fundamentally different religious worldviews: Mo Zi's universal love flows from Heaven's impartial concern for human welfare and seeks sociopolitical harmony, while Christian agape emerges from God's self-giving nature and aims at divine-human communion. Despite these theological differences, both traditions establish love as a religious imperative with radical implications for social ethics, transcending conventional boundaries of moral concern. This comparative theological analysis offers resources for contemporary interreligious dialogue and cross-cultural ethical engagement, suggesting how these complementary religious visions might address shared global challenges while respecting their distinctive spiritual foundations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"54 1","pages":"26-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the theological foundations and ethical implications of Mo Zi's concept of “universal love” (jian ai) and Christian “agape,” exploring their religious dimensions, ontological bases, and contemporary significance. While existing scholarship has often emphasized the ethical similarities between these two traditions, this research provides a more nuanced theological analysis that reveals their distinctive religious foundations. Through systematic examination of Mohist writings and New Testament sources, particularly the Gospels and Johannine literature, this study demonstrates that these love concepts emerge from fundamentally different religious worldviews: Mo Zi's universal love flows from Heaven's impartial concern for human welfare and seeks sociopolitical harmony, while Christian agape emerges from God's self-giving nature and aims at divine-human communion. Despite these theological differences, both traditions establish love as a religious imperative with radical implications for social ethics, transcending conventional boundaries of moral concern. This comparative theological analysis offers resources for contemporary interreligious dialogue and cross-cultural ethical engagement, suggesting how these complementary religious visions might address shared global challenges while respecting their distinctive spiritual foundations.

神爱与人爱:墨子博爱与基督教爱的宗教基础
本文探讨墨子“博爱”和基督教“爱”的神学基础和伦理意蕴,探讨二者的宗教维度、本体论基础和当代意义。虽然现有的学术研究经常强调这两种传统在伦理上的相似性,但这项研究提供了更细致入微的神学分析,揭示了它们独特的宗教基础。通过对墨家著作和新约资料,特别是福音书和约翰文学的系统研究,本研究表明,这些爱的概念产生于根本不同的宗教世界观:墨子的普世之爱来自于天对人类福祉的公正关怀,寻求社会政治和谐,而基督教的爱来自于上帝的自我给予,旨在神人共融。尽管存在这些神学上的差异,但两种传统都将爱确立为一种宗教命令式的行为,对社会伦理有着根本性的影响,超越了传统的道德界限。这种比较神学分析为当代宗教间对话和跨文化伦理参与提供了资源,表明这些互补的宗教愿景如何在尊重其独特精神基础的同时解决共同的全球挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书