Problematizing the Cooperative Firm: A Marxian View on Paradoxes, Dialectics, and Contradictions

IF 6.4 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2026-04-05 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1111/joms.13175
Jon Las Heras, Anjel Errasti, Ignacio Bretos
{"title":"Problematizing the Cooperative Firm: A Marxian View on Paradoxes, Dialectics, and Contradictions","authors":"Jon Las Heras,&nbsp;Anjel Errasti,&nbsp;Ignacio Bretos","doi":"10.1111/joms.13175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars are increasingly turning their attention to cooperative firms, characterized by worker ownership and management, as a way for organizations to address the economic, societal and environmental problems posed by corporate capitalism. This renewed interest stems from the potential of cooperatives to foster an alternative economic system grounded in democratic, solidary and environmentally conscious values. However, previous studies have not provided a comprehensive analysis of the contradictory nature of cooperatives within a broader inter-organizational and systemic framework. Applying a Marxian perspective on paradoxes and dialectics, we theorize that cooperative firms operating within capitalist economies must navigate the ‘solidarity paradox’ – the inherent impossibility of overcoming market competition through partial and limited solidarity strategies. Drawing on an examination of the Mondragon cooperative group, we illustrate how such a fundamental contradiction manifests itself into multiple paradoxes that are interwoven, mutually constituted and inseparable. The article contributes to critical management scholarship on cooperatives by offering a deeper understanding of how these organizations perpetuate systemic capitalist patterns. It also contributes to paradox and dialectics scholarship by theorizing that paradoxes are not timeless and universal but the result of persistent contradictions inherent to historically contingent organizational forms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"63 3","pages":"1124-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.13175","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars are increasingly turning their attention to cooperative firms, characterized by worker ownership and management, as a way for organizations to address the economic, societal and environmental problems posed by corporate capitalism. This renewed interest stems from the potential of cooperatives to foster an alternative economic system grounded in democratic, solidary and environmentally conscious values. However, previous studies have not provided a comprehensive analysis of the contradictory nature of cooperatives within a broader inter-organizational and systemic framework. Applying a Marxian perspective on paradoxes and dialectics, we theorize that cooperative firms operating within capitalist economies must navigate the ‘solidarity paradox’ – the inherent impossibility of overcoming market competition through partial and limited solidarity strategies. Drawing on an examination of the Mondragon cooperative group, we illustrate how such a fundamental contradiction manifests itself into multiple paradoxes that are interwoven, mutually constituted and inseparable. The article contributes to critical management scholarship on cooperatives by offering a deeper understanding of how these organizations perpetuate systemic capitalist patterns. It also contributes to paradox and dialectics scholarship by theorizing that paradoxes are not timeless and universal but the result of persistent contradictions inherent to historically contingent organizational forms.

合作企业问题化:马克思对悖论、辩证法和矛盾的看法
学者们越来越多地将注意力转向合作型企业,这种企业的特点是由工人拥有和管理,是企业解决公司资本主义带来的经济、社会和环境问题的一种方式。这种重新产生的兴趣源于合作社有潜力培育一种以民主、团结和环境意识价值为基础的替代经济制度。但是,以前的研究没有在更广泛的组织间和系统框架内对合作社的矛盾性质进行全面分析。运用马克思关于悖论和辩证法的观点,我们认为在资本主义经济中运作的合作企业必须驾驭“团结悖论”——通过部分和有限的团结战略克服市场竞争的内在不可能性。通过对蒙德拉贡合作集团的考察,我们说明了这样一个基本矛盾如何表现为相互交织、相互构成和不可分割的多重悖论。这篇文章通过提供对这些组织如何使系统性资本主义模式永久化的更深入的理解,对合作社的关键管理学术做出了贡献。它还有助于悖论和辩证法的研究,因为它认为悖论不是永恒的和普遍的,而是历史上偶然的组织形式所固有的持续矛盾的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书