Stratified consumer activism: How socioeconomic status shapes boycott participation

IF 6.9 2区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Journal of Consumer Psychology Pub Date : 2026-04-16 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI:10.1002/jcpy.70021
Yan Vieites, Daniel Fernandes, Debora V. Thompson
{"title":"Stratified consumer activism: How socioeconomic status shapes boycott participation","authors":"Yan Vieites,&nbsp;Daniel Fernandes,&nbsp;Debora V. Thompson","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumer activism is becoming increasingly common worldwide, but are all consumer groups as likely to engage in these practices? The current research investigates the presence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in boycotting participation and explores the psychological processes underlying potential discrepancies. Results from four studies, including cross-national surveys, experiments, and lab-in-the-field evidence, show that low-SES consumers display a lower likelihood of boycotting companies than their high-SES peers. The phenomenon emerges across different measures, including self-reported intentions, past actions, and actual behaviors. This reduced inclination to boycott among the socioeconomically disadvantaged is driven by their reduced sense of control, which induces lower beliefs that consumption can be used as an effective instrument to enact change. These findings offer important contributions to the study of boycotting practices and shed new light on the complex relationship between socioeconomic conditions and consumer behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":48365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","volume":"36 2","pages":"261-269"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://myscp.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcpy.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcpy.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer activism is becoming increasingly common worldwide, but are all consumer groups as likely to engage in these practices? The current research investigates the presence of socioeconomic status (SES) differences in boycotting participation and explores the psychological processes underlying potential discrepancies. Results from four studies, including cross-national surveys, experiments, and lab-in-the-field evidence, show that low-SES consumers display a lower likelihood of boycotting companies than their high-SES peers. The phenomenon emerges across different measures, including self-reported intentions, past actions, and actual behaviors. This reduced inclination to boycott among the socioeconomically disadvantaged is driven by their reduced sense of control, which induces lower beliefs that consumption can be used as an effective instrument to enact change. These findings offer important contributions to the study of boycotting practices and shed new light on the complex relationship between socioeconomic conditions and consumer behavior.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分层消费者行动主义:社会经济地位如何影响抵制参与
消费者行动主义在世界范围内变得越来越普遍,但所有的消费者群体都有可能参与这些实践吗?目前的研究调查社会经济地位(SES)的存在差异抵制参与和探讨潜在差异的心理过程。包括跨国调查、实验和实地实验室证据在内的四项研究结果表明,社会经济地位低的消费者抵制公司的可能性低于社会经济地位高的消费者。这种现象出现在不同的测量方法中,包括自我报告的意图、过去的行为和实际的行为。在社会经济上处于不利地位的群体中,抵制倾向的降低是由于他们的控制感降低,这导致他们对消费可以作为实施变革的有效工具的信念降低。这些发现为抵制行为的研究做出了重要贡献,并为社会经济条件与消费者行为之间的复杂关系提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Psychology is devoted to psychological perspectives on the study of the consumer. It publishes articles that contribute both theoretically and empirically to an understanding of psychological processes underlying consumers thoughts, feelings, decisions, and behaviors. Areas of emphasis include, but are not limited to, consumer judgment and decision processes, attitude formation and change, reactions to persuasive communications, affective experiences, consumer information processing, consumer-brand relationships, affective, cognitive, and motivational determinants of consumer behavior, family and group decision processes, and cultural and individual differences in consumer behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书