Optimizing the Organic Rankine Cycle Fluid for Flue Gas Energy Recovery: A Techno-Economic Analysis

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Chemie Ingenieur Technik Pub Date : 2026-04-07 Epub Date: 2025-12-13 DOI:10.1002/cite.70057
Dr. Vahid Pirouzfar, Maryam Sheykhan, Behnaz Chaharbashi, Prof. Chia-Hung Su
{"title":"Optimizing the Organic Rankine Cycle Fluid for Flue Gas Energy Recovery: A Techno-Economic Analysis","authors":"Dr. Vahid Pirouzfar,&nbsp;Maryam Sheykhan,&nbsp;Behnaz Chaharbashi,&nbsp;Prof. Chia-Hung Su","doi":"10.1002/cite.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates the thermodynamic and economic performance of various working fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)-based energy recovery from flue gases. Initially, benzene, toluene, and pentane were analyzed, with results indicating that pentane achieved the highest power output (1862 kW) with the lowest cost ($14.69 million) at 171.6 °C. To extend the analysis, additional working fluids—including hexane, R134a, propane, and isopentane—were examined for their thermal properties and system compatibility. Their thermal efficiency, power output, and cost-effectiveness were assessed using Aspen HYSYS (Version 14) for process simulations, Aspen Capital Cost Estimator for economic evaluation, and Refprop for thermodynamic property calculations. The findings indicate that hexane improves thermal efficiency by 20 %, whereas R134a reduces environmental impact by 15 %, making them viable alternatives for sustainable ORC applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9912,"journal":{"name":"Chemie Ingenieur Technik","volume":"98 4","pages":"144-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemie Ingenieur Technik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cite.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the thermodynamic and economic performance of various working fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)-based energy recovery from flue gases. Initially, benzene, toluene, and pentane were analyzed, with results indicating that pentane achieved the highest power output (1862 kW) with the lowest cost ($14.69 million) at 171.6 °C. To extend the analysis, additional working fluids—including hexane, R134a, propane, and isopentane—were examined for their thermal properties and system compatibility. Their thermal efficiency, power output, and cost-effectiveness were assessed using Aspen HYSYS (Version 14) for process simulations, Aspen Capital Cost Estimator for economic evaluation, and Refprop for thermodynamic property calculations. The findings indicate that hexane improves thermal efficiency by 20 %, whereas R134a reduces environmental impact by 15 %, making them viable alternatives for sustainable ORC applications.

优化有机朗肯循环液用于烟气能量回收:技术经济分析
本研究评估了基于有机朗肯循环(ORC)的烟气能量回收中各种工质的热力学和经济性能。首先,对苯、甲苯和戊烷进行了分析,结果表明,在171.6°C的温度下,戊烷的输出功率最高(1862 kW),成本最低(1469万美元)。为了扩大分析范围,研究人员还测试了其他工作流体(包括己烷、R134a、丙烷和异戊烷)的热性能和系统兼容性。使用Aspen HYSYS (Version 14)进行过程模拟,使用Aspen Capital Cost Estimator进行经济评估,使用Refprop进行热力学性能计算,对它们的热效率、功率输出和成本效益进行了评估。研究结果表明,己烷提高了20%的热效率,而R134a减少了15%的环境影响,使它们成为可持续ORC应用的可行替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Chemie Ingenieur Technik 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Chemie Ingenieur Technik ist die wohl angesehenste deutschsprachige Zeitschrift für Verfahrensingenieure, technische Chemiker, Apparatebauer und Biotechnologen. Als Fachorgan von DECHEMA, GDCh und VDI-GVC gilt sie als das unverzichtbare Forum für den Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Forschern und Anwendern aus Industrie, Forschung und Entwicklung. Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt und Praxisnähe: Eine Kombination, die es nur in der CIT gibt!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书