Characteristics of the Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: An Analytical Observational Study

IF 1.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cihadiye Elif Ozturk, Sengul Cangur, Banu Humeyra Keskin, Alper Aziz Hudai Ayasli, Pelin Duran, Ayhan Ozturk
{"title":"Characteristics of the Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: An Analytical Observational Study","authors":"Cihadiye Elif Ozturk,&nbsp;Sengul Cangur,&nbsp;Banu Humeyra Keskin,&nbsp;Alper Aziz Hudai Ayasli,&nbsp;Pelin Duran,&nbsp;Ayhan Ozturk","doi":"10.1155/ane/9266094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background:</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by autoimmune inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage. MS has been linked to neuroinflammatory effects originating in the gut. Recently, research has focused on the gut microbiota composition and the differences in the abundance of specific taxa in patients with MS. We aim to determine the distribution of bacterial composition in the intestinal microbiota of patients with MS and to compare them with healthy controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods:</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 27 individuals were selected for the study, 18 of whom were in the MS group and nine in the healthy control group. Participants were surveyed to obtain some demographic and clinical information, body mass index, vitamin D use, and weekly consumption levels of prebiotics–probiotics, carbohydrates, fast-food, and some other foods. Stool samples were also collected.16S rRNA gene sequencing was executed on the samples using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatics (alpha and beta diversity indices) and statistical analyses (analysis of similarity, principal coordinate analysis, permutational multivariate analysis of variance, linear discriminant analysis effect size, Ward′s hierarchical clustering method, etc.) were applied to compare the gut microbiome composition of the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>In the bioinformatics analysis process, all samples were analyzed for 391 taxa. However, due to the complete absence of some taxa or the very low relative abundance of some taxa (n<sub>excluded−taxa</sub> = 249), only 142 taxa were included in the analysis. No significant differences were provided between the groups for microbiota diversity indices (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). However, we found that 22 taxa were discriminatory in the gut microbiota compositions of groups. <i>Actinomyces</i> from the phylum <i>Actinobacteria</i>, unclassified some genera (<i>Barnesiellaceae_, Barnesiellaceae_g_</i>, and <i>Desulfovibrionaceae_g</i>) from the families <i>Barnesiellaceae</i>, <i>Desulfovibrionaceae,</i> a genus classified as other (<i>Veillonellaceae_g_other</i>) from the family <i>Veillonellaceae</i> showed higher levels in the MS patients compared with the healthy controls (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The control group showed significant increases in relative abundance of <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Peptococcus</i> from the phylum <i>Firmicutes</i>, <i>Pseudomonas</i> from the phylum <i>Proteobacteria</i>, unclassified genus (<i>Streptophyta_g_</i>) from the order <i>Streptophyta</i>, unclassified genera (<i>Pseudomonadaceae_g_, Lachnospiraceae_g_</i>) from the families <i>Pseudomonadaceae</i> and <i>Lachnospiraceae</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion:</h3>\n \n <p>In our study, it was thought that the increase in the taxa <i>Actinomycetaceae</i>, <i>Barnesiellaceae</i>, <i>Desulfovibrionaceae</i>, and <i>Veillonellaceae</i>, which have been proven to be associated with inflammatory processes in the intestinal microbiota, and the decrease or loss of the taxa <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Opitutae</i>, and <i>Lachnospiraceae</i>, which are important parts of the eubiotic microbiota, may be effective in MS disease by causing inflammatory processes. We believe that our findings will make a crucial contribution to establishing a picture of the gut microbiota composition in MS patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/9266094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/9266094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by autoimmune inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage. MS has been linked to neuroinflammatory effects originating in the gut. Recently, research has focused on the gut microbiota composition and the differences in the abundance of specific taxa in patients with MS. We aim to determine the distribution of bacterial composition in the intestinal microbiota of patients with MS and to compare them with healthy controls.

Methods:

A total of 27 individuals were selected for the study, 18 of whom were in the MS group and nine in the healthy control group. Participants were surveyed to obtain some demographic and clinical information, body mass index, vitamin D use, and weekly consumption levels of prebiotics–probiotics, carbohydrates, fast-food, and some other foods. Stool samples were also collected.16S rRNA gene sequencing was executed on the samples using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatics (alpha and beta diversity indices) and statistical analyses (analysis of similarity, principal coordinate analysis, permutational multivariate analysis of variance, linear discriminant analysis effect size, Ward′s hierarchical clustering method, etc.) were applied to compare the gut microbiome composition of the groups.

Results:

In the bioinformatics analysis process, all samples were analyzed for 391 taxa. However, due to the complete absence of some taxa or the very low relative abundance of some taxa (nexcluded−taxa = 249), only 142 taxa were included in the analysis. No significant differences were provided between the groups for microbiota diversity indices (p > 0.05). However, we found that 22 taxa were discriminatory in the gut microbiota compositions of groups. Actinomyces from the phylum Actinobacteria, unclassified some genera (Barnesiellaceae_, Barnesiellaceae_g_, and Desulfovibrionaceae_g) from the families Barnesiellaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, a genus classified as other (Veillonellaceae_g_other) from the family Veillonellaceae showed higher levels in the MS patients compared with the healthy controls (p < 0.05). The control group showed significant increases in relative abundance of Blautia, Peptococcus from the phylum Firmicutes, Pseudomonas from the phylum Proteobacteria, unclassified genus (Streptophyta_g_) from the order Streptophyta, unclassified genera (Pseudomonadaceae_g_, Lachnospiraceae_g_) from the families Pseudomonadaceae and Lachnospiraceae (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

In our study, it was thought that the increase in the taxa Actinomycetaceae, Barnesiellaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, and Veillonellaceae, which have been proven to be associated with inflammatory processes in the intestinal microbiota, and the decrease or loss of the taxa Blautia, Opitutae, and Lachnospiraceae, which are important parts of the eubiotic microbiota, may be effective in MS disease by causing inflammatory processes. We believe that our findings will make a crucial contribution to establishing a picture of the gut microbiota composition in MS patients.

Abstract Image

多发性硬化症患者肠道微生物群的特征:一项分析性观察研究
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)是一种以自身免疫性炎症、脱髓鞘和轴突损伤为特征的中枢神经系统慢性疾病。多发性硬化症与源自肠道的神经炎症效应有关。最近,研究集中在MS患者肠道微生物群组成和特定分类群丰度的差异上,目的是确定MS患者肠道微生物群中细菌组成的分布,并将其与健康对照组进行比较。方法:选取27例患者进行研究,其中MS组18例,健康对照组9例。研究人员对参与者进行了调查,以获取一些人口统计和临床信息、体重指数、维生素D的使用情况以及每周益生元(益生菌)、碳水化合物、快餐和其他一些食物的消费水平。同时收集粪便样本。使用Illumina MiSeq平台对样品进行16S rRNA基因测序。采用生物信息学(α和β多样性指数)和统计学分析(相似性分析、主坐标分析、多变量方差排列分析、线性判别分析效应大小、Ward分层聚类法等)比较各组肠道微生物组的组成。结果:在生物信息学分析过程中,对所有样本的391个分类群进行了分析。然而,由于某些分类群完全缺失或相对丰度很低(排除- taxa = 249),仅纳入142个分类群。各组间微生物群多样性指数无显著差异(p > 0.05)。然而,我们发现22个分类群在群体肠道微生物群组成上具有歧视性。MS患者放线菌门,未分类的Barnesiellaceae_, Barnesiellaceae_g_和Desulfovibrionaceae_g属来自Barnesiellaceae,未分类的Desulfovibrionaceae属(veillonellace_g_other)来自Veillonellaceae,与健康对照组相比,MS患者放线菌水平较高(p < 0.05)。对照组蓝藻菌、厚壁菌门胃球菌、变形菌门假单胞菌、链菌目未分类属(Streptophyta_g_)、假单胞菌科和毛菌科未分类属(Pseudomonadaceae_g_、Lachnospiraceae_g_)的相对丰度显著增加(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究认为,已被证实与肠道微生物群炎症过程相关的放线菌科、Barnesiellaceae、Desulfovibrionaceae和Veillonellaceae类群的增加,以及益生菌群重要组成部分Blautia、Opitutae和Lachnospiraceae类群的减少或减少,可能通过引起炎症过程对MS病有效。我们相信我们的发现将对建立MS患者肠道微生物群组成的图片做出重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书