Exploring the reciprocal relationships between job demands, job resources, and workplace misconduct: A meta-analytic panel analysis

IF 3.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale Pub Date : 2026-04-07 DOI:10.1111/apps.70085

Yuxiang Luan, Zixu Zhang, Jiaxin Xue, Danyang Wang

{"title":"Exploring the reciprocal relationships between job demands, job resources, and workplace misconduct: A meta-analytic panel analysis","authors":"Yuxiang Luan, Zixu Zhang, Jiaxin Xue, Danyang Wang","doi":"10.1111/apps.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the reciprocal relationships between job demands, job resources, and workplace misconduct using a meta-analytic cross-lagged analysis (k = 21, N = 14,897 for demands; k = 8, N = 7,934 for resources). Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory and the job demands–resources (JD–R) theory, we develop hypotheses regarding the reciprocal associations of demands and resources with misconduct. Results support these expectations: job demands and misconduct are reciprocally related, as well as job resources and misconduct. Moderation analyses partially support the moderating roles of demand type (hindrance vs. challenge demands; social vs. organizational demands) and country-level job resources in the associations between job demands and misconduct. Continuous-time analyses further indicate that reciprocal associations between job demands and workplace misconduct change over time. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"75 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.70085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the reciprocal relationships between job demands, job resources, and workplace misconduct using a meta-analytic cross-lagged analysis (k = 21, N = 14,897 for demands; k = 8, N = 7,934 for resources). Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory and the job demands–resources (JD–R) theory, we develop hypotheses regarding the reciprocal associations of demands and resources with misconduct. Results support these expectations: job demands and misconduct are reciprocally related, as well as job resources and misconduct. Moderation analyses partially support the moderating roles of demand type (hindrance vs. challenge demands; social vs. organizational demands) and country-level job resources in the associations between job demands and misconduct. Continuous-time analyses further indicate that reciprocal associations between job demands and workplace misconduct change over time. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探讨工作需求、工作资源和工作场所不当行为之间的相互关系：一个元分析面板分析

本研究采用交叉滞后元分析方法（需求k = 21, N = 14,897；资源k = 8, N = 7,934）检验了工作需求、工作资源和工作场所不当行为之间的相互关系。利用资源守恒理论（COR）和工作需求-资源（JD-R）理论，我们提出了关于需求和资源与不当行为相互关联的假设。结果支持这些期望：工作需求和不当行为是相互相关的，工作资源和不当行为也是相互相关的。适度分析部分支持需求类型（障碍需求vs挑战需求；社会需求vs组织需求）和国家层面的工作资源在工作需求与不当行为之间的关联中的调节作用。连续时间分析进一步表明，工作需求和工作场所不当行为之间的相互关联随着时间的推移而变化。讨论了理论和实践意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

13.70

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.