Development and Evaluation of a Novel Soil Water Balance Approach for Mountain Catchments

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Sebastian Moran, Sarah Leray, Carlos A. Bonilla, Cristina Contreras
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Novel Soil Water Balance Approach for Mountain Catchments","authors":"Sebastian Moran,&nbsp;Sarah Leray,&nbsp;Carlos A. Bonilla,&nbsp;Cristina Contreras","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Mountains are pivotal in the hydrological cycle and affect at least half the global population. However, quantifying the mountain hydrological cycle presents significant challenges owing to its inherent complexity and remoteness. Traditional soil water balance (SWB) methods, which assume sequential and hierarchical processes, fail to adequately capture the crucial contributions of vegetation and subsurface dynamics. A novel SWB method that combines a mass balance model and fully distributed water flow and storage simulation in unsaturated soil is used to address these limitations. By leveraging the concept of hillslope water sustenance, this innovative approach significantly enhances the assessment of water partitioning. It models the interactions between surface and near-surface processes with greater accuracy. This new approach was evaluated in an Andean mountain catchment, where the impact of soil, vegetation and slope on the hydrological balance components was determined for 48 representative hillslopes. The disparities between the proposed method and conventional SWB approaches are significant, particularly in scenarios where available water allows competition among different hydrologic processes. The proposed approach results in higher soil water storage, approximately 5% higher annual recharge, and, more importantly, explicitly accounts for the interflow. Recharge and interflow can constitute as much as 25% and 11% of the annual precipitation, respectively, and the water deficit can exceed 46% of the reference evapotranspiration. Following the proposed replicable workflow, it is feasible to implement a non-sequential SWB approach and better assess the competition between vegetation water use and water flow and storage on mountain hillslopes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mountains are pivotal in the hydrological cycle and affect at least half the global population. However, quantifying the mountain hydrological cycle presents significant challenges owing to its inherent complexity and remoteness. Traditional soil water balance (SWB) methods, which assume sequential and hierarchical processes, fail to adequately capture the crucial contributions of vegetation and subsurface dynamics. A novel SWB method that combines a mass balance model and fully distributed water flow and storage simulation in unsaturated soil is used to address these limitations. By leveraging the concept of hillslope water sustenance, this innovative approach significantly enhances the assessment of water partitioning. It models the interactions between surface and near-surface processes with greater accuracy. This new approach was evaluated in an Andean mountain catchment, where the impact of soil, vegetation and slope on the hydrological balance components was determined for 48 representative hillslopes. The disparities between the proposed method and conventional SWB approaches are significant, particularly in scenarios where available water allows competition among different hydrologic processes. The proposed approach results in higher soil water storage, approximately 5% higher annual recharge, and, more importantly, explicitly accounts for the interflow. Recharge and interflow can constitute as much as 25% and 11% of the annual precipitation, respectively, and the water deficit can exceed 46% of the reference evapotranspiration. Following the proposed replicable workflow, it is feasible to implement a non-sequential SWB approach and better assess the competition between vegetation water use and water flow and storage on mountain hillslopes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新的山地流域水土平衡方法的发展与评价
山脉在水循环中起着关键作用,影响着全球至少一半的人口。然而,山地水文循环的量化由于其固有的复杂性和偏远性而面临重大挑战。传统的土壤水分平衡(SWB)方法假设了顺序和分层过程,未能充分捕捉植被和地下动态的关键贡献。一种新的SWB方法结合了质量平衡模型和非饱和土壤中完全分布的水流和储存模拟来解决这些局限性。通过利用山坡水维持的概念,这种创新的方法显着增强了对水分配的评估。它以更高的精度模拟地表和近地表过程之间的相互作用。这种新方法在安第斯山脉集水区进行了评价,在那里确定了48个代表性山坡的土壤、植被和坡度对水文平衡成分的影响。所提出的方法与传统的SWB方法之间的差异是显著的,特别是在可用水允许不同水文过程之间竞争的情况下。提出的方法提高了土壤储水量,年补给量提高了约5%,更重要的是,明确地解释了相互流动。补给和互流可分别占年降水量的25%和11%,亏水量可超过参考蒸散量的46%。根据提出的可复制工作流程,实施非顺序SWB方法是可行的,可以更好地评估山坡植被用水与水流和储水量之间的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书