Potential U.S. Tariffs and Vaccine Trade: An Analysis of Their Implications for Healthcare Quality

IF 2.2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Suleiman O. Mamman
{"title":"Potential U.S. Tariffs and Vaccine Trade: An Analysis of Their Implications for Healthcare Quality","authors":"Suleiman O. Mamman","doi":"10.1111/polp.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Historically, the development of human vaccines has represented one of the greatest scientific advancements in global health, preventing over 154 million deaths since 1974. However, the Trump 2.0 administration's moves on global trade tariffs, coupled with the current head of the Department of Health and Human Services, who is known to be a vaccine skeptic, have raised concerns about the future of vaccination in the US. In this light, this study evaluates the potential implications of these tariff threats on human vaccines, using network analysis, machine learning, and quantile regression models with data from 2000 to 2022. Findings reveal that the US is one of the major players in the global vaccine trade, and its tariffs were found to have a significant influence on global vaccine demand and prices. One of the implications of these tariff-induced reductions in vaccine trade is the creation of conditions leading to shortages and undermining immunization rates. Thus, this study concludes that tariffs on vaccines could adversely affect healthcare quality and recommends careful consideration of tariff policies to avoid vaccine compromise. This is because evidence suggests that by fragmenting trade routes and raising costs, tariffs might impair the overall density and connectivity of the vaccine trade network. This causes delays in global vaccine delivery and increases reliance on a few central hubs. However, the analysis suggests that the United States can foster supply-chain collaboration frameworks to maintain its strategic position in the global vaccine trade.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Lauby, Fanny, and Christopher J. McKinley. 2023. “Factors of Early COVID-19 Prevention Policy Engagement in France and in the United States.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51, no. 5: 830–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12556.</p>\n \n <p>Onyango, Gedion, and Japheth Otieno Ondiek. 2022. “Open Innovation during the COVID-19 Pandemic Policy responses in South Africa and Kenya.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 50, no. 5: 1008–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12490.</p>\n \n <p>Luján, José Luis. 2023. “Evidence-based Policies: Lessons from Regulatory Science.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51, no. 4: 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, the development of human vaccines has represented one of the greatest scientific advancements in global health, preventing over 154 million deaths since 1974. However, the Trump 2.0 administration's moves on global trade tariffs, coupled with the current head of the Department of Health and Human Services, who is known to be a vaccine skeptic, have raised concerns about the future of vaccination in the US. In this light, this study evaluates the potential implications of these tariff threats on human vaccines, using network analysis, machine learning, and quantile regression models with data from 2000 to 2022. Findings reveal that the US is one of the major players in the global vaccine trade, and its tariffs were found to have a significant influence on global vaccine demand and prices. One of the implications of these tariff-induced reductions in vaccine trade is the creation of conditions leading to shortages and undermining immunization rates. Thus, this study concludes that tariffs on vaccines could adversely affect healthcare quality and recommends careful consideration of tariff policies to avoid vaccine compromise. This is because evidence suggests that by fragmenting trade routes and raising costs, tariffs might impair the overall density and connectivity of the vaccine trade network. This causes delays in global vaccine delivery and increases reliance on a few central hubs. However, the analysis suggests that the United States can foster supply-chain collaboration frameworks to maintain its strategic position in the global vaccine trade.

Related Articles

Lauby, Fanny, and Christopher J. McKinley. 2023. “Factors of Early COVID-19 Prevention Policy Engagement in France and in the United States.” Politics & Policy 51, no. 5: 830–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12556.

Onyango, Gedion, and Japheth Otieno Ondiek. 2022. “Open Innovation during the COVID-19 Pandemic Policy responses in South Africa and Kenya.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 5: 1008–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12490.

Luján, José Luis. 2023. “Evidence-based Policies: Lessons from Regulatory Science.” Politics & Policy 51, no. 4: 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543.

潜在的美国关税和疫苗贸易:对医疗保健质量的影响分析
从历史上看,人类疫苗的开发是全球卫生领域最伟大的科学进步之一,自1974年以来防止了1.54亿多人死亡。然而,特朗普政府在全球贸易关税方面的举动,加上现任卫生与公众服务部部长是一名疫苗怀疑论者,引发了人们对美国疫苗接种未来的担忧。有鉴于此,本研究利用2000年至2022年的数据,利用网络分析、机器学习和分位数回归模型,评估了这些关税威胁对人类疫苗的潜在影响。调查结果显示,美国是全球疫苗贸易的主要参与者之一,其关税对全球疫苗需求和价格产生重大影响。这些关税导致的疫苗贸易减少的影响之一是造成导致短缺和降低免疫接种率的条件。因此,本研究得出结论,疫苗关税可能对医疗保健质量产生不利影响,并建议仔细考虑关税政策,以避免在疫苗问题上妥协。这是因为有证据表明,通过分散贸易路线和提高成本,关税可能会损害疫苗贸易网络的总体密度和连通性。这导致全球疫苗交付延迟,并增加了对少数中心中心的依赖。然而,分析表明,美国可以促进供应链合作框架,以保持其在全球疫苗贸易中的战略地位。劳比、范妮和克里斯托弗·麦金利。2023. “法国和美国早期COVID-19预防政策参与的因素”。《政治与政策》第51期。5: 830 - 848。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12556。Onyango, Gedion和Japheth Otieno Ondiek, 2022。“南非和肯尼亚应对COVID-19大流行政策期间的开放式创新”政治与政策50,不。5: 1008 - 1031。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12490。Luján,约瑟·路易斯,2023。“基于证据的政策:来自监管科学的教训。”《政治与政策》第51期。4: 524 - 537。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书