Mathematical modeling of direct electron transfer and mediated electron transfer mechanisms in enzymatic glucose fuel cells under substrate inhibition

IF 2.6 4区 化学 Q3 ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Samuel Reji, Balaji Krishnamurthy
{"title":"Mathematical modeling of direct electron transfer and mediated electron transfer mechanisms in enzymatic glucose fuel cells under substrate inhibition","authors":"Samuel Reji,&nbsp;Balaji Krishnamurthy","doi":"10.1007/s10008-026-06528-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Kinetic and transport factors are of crucial importance for the performance of enzymatic glucose fuel cells, EGFCs, particularly under conditions of substrate inhibition. This study focuses on the development, implementation, and comparison of Direct Electron Transfer (DET) and Mediated Electron Transfer(MET) mechanisms, with the aim of investigating substrate inhibition effects. Explicitly, it accounts for substrate inhibition, enzyme concentration, mediator dynamics, and electrochemical reactions to determine optimal working conditions. In the MET model, the Nernst Ping-pong model is used to account for mediator-dependent electron transfer and overpotential effects. Simulation results show that the DET current peaks at 1.2 mol m⁻³ substrate with 1.05 mA, whereas the MET current peaks at 1.25 mA for a lower concentration of 0.94 mol m⁻³. Furthermore, a 50% and 45% degradation of the catalytic current is observed at a 5 mol m⁻³ substrate concentration for both. The model identifies an optimal mediator concentration of 77 mM and shows that increasing mediator loading from 50 to 100 mM enhances the catalytic current by ~ 30–35%, whereas increasing the overpotential from 0.05 to 0.2 V results in a comparatively smaller improvement of ~ 10–15%. This indicates that EGFC performance is significantly more sensitive to mediator loading than to overpotential within the investigated range. Validation against experimental data demonstrates excellent agreement, with an R² value of 0.92. The models developed in this work provide guidelines for optimizing enzyme and mediator loading to mitigate substrate inhibition and enhance the efficiency of EGFC.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry","volume":"30 5","pages":"1997 - 2008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10008-026-06528-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kinetic and transport factors are of crucial importance for the performance of enzymatic glucose fuel cells, EGFCs, particularly under conditions of substrate inhibition. This study focuses on the development, implementation, and comparison of Direct Electron Transfer (DET) and Mediated Electron Transfer(MET) mechanisms, with the aim of investigating substrate inhibition effects. Explicitly, it accounts for substrate inhibition, enzyme concentration, mediator dynamics, and electrochemical reactions to determine optimal working conditions. In the MET model, the Nernst Ping-pong model is used to account for mediator-dependent electron transfer and overpotential effects. Simulation results show that the DET current peaks at 1.2 mol m⁻³ substrate with 1.05 mA, whereas the MET current peaks at 1.25 mA for a lower concentration of 0.94 mol m⁻³. Furthermore, a 50% and 45% degradation of the catalytic current is observed at a 5 mol m⁻³ substrate concentration for both. The model identifies an optimal mediator concentration of 77 mM and shows that increasing mediator loading from 50 to 100 mM enhances the catalytic current by ~ 30–35%, whereas increasing the overpotential from 0.05 to 0.2 V results in a comparatively smaller improvement of ~ 10–15%. This indicates that EGFC performance is significantly more sensitive to mediator loading than to overpotential within the investigated range. Validation against experimental data demonstrates excellent agreement, with an R² value of 0.92. The models developed in this work provide guidelines for optimizing enzyme and mediator loading to mitigate substrate inhibition and enhance the efficiency of EGFC.

Abstract Image

底物抑制下酶促葡萄糖燃料电池中直接电子转移和介导电子转移机制的数学建模
动力学和运输因子对酶促葡萄糖燃料电池(egfc)的性能至关重要,特别是在底物抑制的条件下。本研究的重点是直接电子转移(DET)和介导电子转移(MET)机制的发展、实施和比较,目的是研究底物的抑制作用。明确地,它考虑底物抑制,酶浓度,介质动力学和电化学反应,以确定最佳工作条件。在MET模型中,能量乒乓模型用于解释依赖介质的电子转移和过电位效应。模拟结果表明,DET的电流峰值为1.2 mol m -⁻³,浓度为1.05 mA,而MET的电流峰值为1.25 mA,浓度为0.94 mol m -⁻³。此外,在5 mol m - 3的底物浓度下,对两者的催化电流有50%和45%的降解。该模型确定了最佳介质浓度为77 mM,并表明将介质负载从50增加到100 mM可使催化电流提高~ 30-35%,而将过电位从0.05增加到0.2 V可使催化电流提高~ 10-15%。这表明在研究范围内,EGFC性能对介质负载的敏感性明显高于对过电位的敏感性。对实验数据进行验证,结果吻合良好,R²值为0.92。在这项工作中建立的模型为优化酶和介质负载以减轻底物抑制和提高EGFC效率提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry is devoted to all aspects of solid-state chemistry and solid-state physics in electrochemistry. The Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry publishes papers on all aspects of electrochemistry of solid compounds, including experimental and theoretical, basic and applied work. It equally publishes papers on the thermodynamics and kinetics of electrochemical reactions if at least one actively participating phase is solid. Also of interest are articles on the transport of ions and electrons in solids whenever these processes are relevant to electrochemical reactions and on the use of solid-state electrochemical reactions in the analysis of solids and their surfaces. The journal covers solid-state electrochemistry and focusses on the following fields: mechanisms of solid-state electrochemical reactions, semiconductor electrochemistry, electrochemical batteries, accumulators and fuel cells, electrochemical mineral leaching, galvanic metal plating, electrochemical potential memory devices, solid-state electrochemical sensors, ion and electron transport in solid materials and polymers, electrocatalysis, photoelectrochemistry, corrosion of solid materials, solid-state electroanalysis, electrochemical machining of materials, electrochromism and electrochromic devices, new electrochemical solid-state synthesis. The Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry makes the professional in research and industry aware of this swift progress and its importance for future developments and success in the above-mentioned fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书