Behavioural strategies for electric mobility in urban environments: A systematic review and policy outlook

IF 3.4 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Atmospheric Environment: X Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100452
Gonçalo Santinha, Jéssica Tavares, Rafaela Oliveira, Alexandre Fernandes
{"title":"Behavioural strategies for electric mobility in urban environments: A systematic review and policy outlook","authors":"Gonçalo Santinha,&nbsp;Jéssica Tavares,&nbsp;Rafaela Oliveira,&nbsp;Alexandre Fernandes","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving low-carbon mobility in urban environments requires not only technological innovation but also sustained behavioural change. However, policy and research have predominantly focused on economic incentives and infrastructure provision, while behavioural strategies, particularly nudging, remain comparatively underexplored. This article presents a systematic review focused specifically on nudge-based interventions promoting electric mobility. Following the PRISMA protocol, an initial search identified 476 records, from which 29 studies (2013–2025) were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. The review combines bibliometric and qualitative analyses to examine publication trends, geographical distribution, methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks, and the types and effectiveness of nudge interventions. The results reveal a strong predominance of informational nudges, particularly those aimed at translating complex technical or economic information into simpler and more accessible formats. Interventions targeting decision structures (e.g., default options) and decision support (e.g., feedback or reminders) are comparatively less represented. The literature is heavily concentrated in high-income contexts and relies predominantly on short-term experimental designs focused on individual-level behaviour, often overlooking systemic drivers, contextual variation, and equity implications. Overall, the findings indicate that while nudges can positively influence electric vehicle–related decisions, their effects are generally modest and context-dependent. This highlights the need to combine behavioural interventions with infrastructural and policy measures. The review identifies key gaps in theoretical integration, methodological diversity, and user segmentation, and argues for embedding behavioural insights within broader urban policy and environmental planning frameworks to support more inclusive and effective pathways towards low-carbon mobility and reduced transport-related emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162126000407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving low-carbon mobility in urban environments requires not only technological innovation but also sustained behavioural change. However, policy and research have predominantly focused on economic incentives and infrastructure provision, while behavioural strategies, particularly nudging, remain comparatively underexplored. This article presents a systematic review focused specifically on nudge-based interventions promoting electric mobility. Following the PRISMA protocol, an initial search identified 476 records, from which 29 studies (2013–2025) were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. The review combines bibliometric and qualitative analyses to examine publication trends, geographical distribution, methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks, and the types and effectiveness of nudge interventions. The results reveal a strong predominance of informational nudges, particularly those aimed at translating complex technical or economic information into simpler and more accessible formats. Interventions targeting decision structures (e.g., default options) and decision support (e.g., feedback or reminders) are comparatively less represented. The literature is heavily concentrated in high-income contexts and relies predominantly on short-term experimental designs focused on individual-level behaviour, often overlooking systemic drivers, contextual variation, and equity implications. Overall, the findings indicate that while nudges can positively influence electric vehicle–related decisions, their effects are generally modest and context-dependent. This highlights the need to combine behavioural interventions with infrastructural and policy measures. The review identifies key gaps in theoretical integration, methodological diversity, and user segmentation, and argues for embedding behavioural insights within broader urban policy and environmental planning frameworks to support more inclusive and effective pathways towards low-carbon mobility and reduced transport-related emissions.
城市环境中电动交通的行为策略:系统回顾和政策展望
在城市环境中实现低碳交通不仅需要技术创新,还需要持续的行为改变。然而,政策和研究主要集中在经济激励和基础设施提供上,而行为策略,特别是推动,相对而言仍未得到充分探索。这篇文章提出了一个系统的回顾,特别关注以轻推为基础的干预措施,促进电动交通。根据PRISMA方案,初步检索确定了476条记录,根据预定义的资格标准从中选择了29项研究(2013-2025)。这篇综述结合了文献计量学和定性分析来研究出版趋势、地理分布、方法方法、理论框架以及助推干预的类型和有效性。结果显示,信息推动的优势很大,特别是那些旨在将复杂的技术或经济信息转化为更简单、更容易获取的格式的推动。针对决策结构(例如,默认选项)和决策支持(例如,反馈或提醒)的干预措施相对较少。这些文献主要集中在高收入背景下,主要依赖于关注个人层面行为的短期实验设计,往往忽视了系统驱动因素、背景差异和公平影响。总体而言,研究结果表明,虽然推动可以积极影响与电动汽车相关的决策,但它们的影响通常是温和的,并且取决于环境。这凸显了将行为干预与基础设施和政策措施结合起来的必要性。报告指出了理论整合、方法多样性和用户细分方面的主要差距,并主张在更广泛的城市政策和环境规划框架中嵌入行为洞察,以支持更具包容性和更有效的途径,实现低碳出行和减少交通相关排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment: X
Atmospheric Environment: X Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书