Samuel D. Slavin , Martha L. Daviglus , Olga Garcia-Bedoya , Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani , Frank Penedo , Krista Perreira , Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller , Alberto Ramos , Raymond Rigat , Gregory Talavera , Andrew Telzak , Murray A. Mittleman
{"title":"Patient-clinician communication and cardiovascular outcomes: An analysis of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos (HCHS/SOL), 2008-2019","authors":"Samuel D. Slavin , Martha L. Daviglus , Olga Garcia-Bedoya , Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani , Frank Penedo , Krista Perreira , Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller , Alberto Ramos , Raymond Rigat , Gregory Talavera , Andrew Telzak , Murray A. Mittleman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Strong patient-clinician communication may improve health outcomes for Hispanic/Latino individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We assessed the association between patient-clinician communication and cardiovascular (CV) events or death in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>HCHS/SOL is a longitudinal cohort study of individuals aged 18–74 who identified as Hispanic/Latino at 4 U.S. metropolitan areas. Participants' ratings of communication with clinicians during the year before enrollment were used to generate a 3-level communication score. The primary outcome was the composite of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure events (HF), stroke, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included the components of the primary outcome. The association between the baseline communication score and outcomes of interest was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for possible confounders. We also used multivariable linear regression to assess the cross-sectional association between communication and AHA Life’s Essential 8 (LE8), a measure of CV risk factors. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our sample included 10,527 individuals without prior CV events and at least one medical encounter in the year before enrollment. The median age at enrollment was 41 years (IQR 29, 53), 59% were female, and 71% perceived high-quality communication with clinicians. The mean follow-up time was 9.4 years. High-quality communication was associated with the following results in our fully adjusted analyses: composite outcome (aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.51, 1.03; <em>p</em> = 0.073), CV events (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44, 1.51, <em>p</em> = 0.520), all-cause mortality (aHR 0.54; 95% CI 0.37, 0.80; <em>p</em> = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>High-quality patient-clinician communication was associated with a non-significant trend toward a lower rate of CV events and death, driven by a significant association with lower all-cause mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101493"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667726000875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Strong patient-clinician communication may improve health outcomes for Hispanic/Latino individuals.
Objective
We assessed the association between patient-clinician communication and cardiovascular (CV) events or death in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).
Methods
HCHS/SOL is a longitudinal cohort study of individuals aged 18–74 who identified as Hispanic/Latino at 4 U.S. metropolitan areas. Participants' ratings of communication with clinicians during the year before enrollment were used to generate a 3-level communication score. The primary outcome was the composite of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure events (HF), stroke, and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included the components of the primary outcome. The association between the baseline communication score and outcomes of interest was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for possible confounders. We also used multivariable linear regression to assess the cross-sectional association between communication and AHA Life’s Essential 8 (LE8), a measure of CV risk factors. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design.
Results
Our sample included 10,527 individuals without prior CV events and at least one medical encounter in the year before enrollment. The median age at enrollment was 41 years (IQR 29, 53), 59% were female, and 71% perceived high-quality communication with clinicians. The mean follow-up time was 9.4 years. High-quality communication was associated with the following results in our fully adjusted analyses: composite outcome (aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.51, 1.03; p = 0.073), CV events (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44, 1.51, p = 0.520), all-cause mortality (aHR 0.54; 95% CI 0.37, 0.80; p = 0.002).
Conclusions
High-quality patient-clinician communication was associated with a non-significant trend toward a lower rate of CV events and death, driven by a significant association with lower all-cause mortality.
背景:良好的医患沟通可以改善西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者的健康状况。目的在西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)中评估医患沟通与心血管(CV)事件或死亡之间的关系。shchs /SOL是一项纵向队列研究,研究对象为美国4个大都市地区18-74岁的西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体。参与者在入组前一年与临床医生沟通的评分被用于生成三级沟通评分。主要结局是心肌梗死(MI)、心力衰竭事件(HF)、中风和全因死亡率的综合结果。次要结局包括主要结局的组成部分。使用Cox比例风险模型对可能的混杂因素进行校正,评估基线沟通评分与感兴趣的结果之间的关联。我们还使用多变量线性回归来评估沟通与美国心脏协会生命基本8 (LE8)之间的横断面关联,LE8是衡量心血管危险因素的指标。所有的分析都解释了复杂的调查设计。结果我们的样本包括10,527名没有既往CV事件且在入组前一年至少有一次医疗经历的个体。入组时的中位年龄为41岁(IQR 29,53), 59%为女性,71%认为与临床医生有高质量的沟通。平均随访时间为9.4年。在我们的完全校正分析中,高质量的沟通与以下结果相关:复合结局(aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.51, 1.03; p = 0.073), CV事件(aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44, 1.51, p = 0.520),全因死亡率(aHR 0.54; 95% CI 0.37, 0.80; p = 0.002)。结论:高质量的医患沟通与降低全因死亡率有显著相关性,但与降低心血管事件和死亡率无显著相关性。